dark light

Bhoy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,411 through 1,425 (of 2,052 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #381127
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: 9 Aircraft Carriers to Gulf?

    as I understood it from the News yesterday, the Charles de Gaulle isn’t actually going to the Gulf, it’s going for manoeuvers in the Eastern Med (although that’d potentially also be within striking distance of Iraq)

    in reply to: 9 Aircraft Carriers to Gulf? #1963754
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: 9 Aircraft Carriers to Gulf?

    as I understood it from the News yesterday, the Charles de Gaulle isn’t actually going to the Gulf, it’s going for manoeuvers in the Eastern Med (although that’d potentially also be within striking distance of Iraq)

    in reply to: Iberia gets A340-600 #674255
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: Iberia gets A340-600

    hey, we were talking about this last week… in conjunction with Boeing losing the plot with that statement on their website… 😉

    in reply to: Alliance Air #674257
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: Alliance Air

    or do you mean this one?
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3e41af1bbda39291.jpg

    in reply to: Airport codes #674498
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: Airport codes

    so what are EGPF, EGPK, EGPH and EGPD near, then? :S

    (that’s Glasgow, Prestwick, Edinburgh and Aberdeen respectively to the uninititaed) And where does EGQL fit in, which is pretty much half way between EGPH and EGPD (it’s Leuchars/St. Andrews, before you ask)?

    in reply to: General Discussion #381443
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: Earth re-entry problems

    a new design sounds sensible… BUT… it’s built by Boeing, which can mean only one thing…

    stand by for the Space Shuttle NG…

    the almost newly designed, Orbiter-600 (also avaliable in slightly bigger -7/8/900 series).

    Combining the best 30 year old technology with slightly bigger luggage racks.

    Plus, of course (and this is best bit) the option of winglets.

    and of course, the loosely based upon BBO (Boeing Business Orbiter).

    in reply to: Earth re-entry problems #1963971
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: Earth re-entry problems

    a new design sounds sensible… BUT… it’s built by Boeing, which can mean only one thing…

    stand by for the Space Shuttle NG…

    the almost newly designed, Orbiter-600 (also avaliable in slightly bigger -7/8/900 series).

    Combining the best 30 year old technology with slightly bigger luggage racks.

    Plus, of course (and this is best bit) the option of winglets.

    and of course, the loosely based upon BBO (Boeing Business Orbiter).

    in reply to: Short-haul turboprops #676350
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: Short-haul turboprops

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 02-02-03 AT 04:48 PM (GMT)]it’s not the ATR he’s listed at the bottom, it’s the ATP…

    for reasons, see his (or rather, my regurgigation) post of a cynical piece about the ATP a couple of days ago in the ‘favourite big turboprop’ thread. (http://www.keymags.co.uk/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=read_count&om=2…)

    in reply to: 717 #676795
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: 717

    why?????

    it has dead duck stamped all over it…

    innovate, not upgrade, ffs…

    and to consider Boeing’s motto is… Forever new Frontiers… :S

    in reply to: Boeing… a bit P'ed off at Iberia. #676805
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: IBERIA TO JOIN THE LONG LIST OF A340-500/-600 CUSTOMERS

    if airlines went for looks, the 737 would be a dead duck.

    in reply to: KLM sells BUZZ to Ryanair #678006
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: KLM sells BUZZ to Ryanair

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 31-01-03 AT 02:42 PM (GMT)]>Buzz’s operation suffers from two structural cost problems, (1) an >inappropriate expensive fleet and (2) expensive congested airports. >Ryanair can and will resolve both problems within 12 months.

    1)
    yes, they’re called ugly bassas. er, I mean, 737s.

    2) noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    in reply to: Closed Airports #678011
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: Closed Airports

    I was trying to send my grandfather home to Glasgow from BSL today…

    the lunchtime BA/LX LHR flight was cancelled, but we managed to get him on the LX flight to MAN at 12:10. at least, it was scheduled for 12:10… it left 40 minutes late, which means he’s missed his connecting flight (having rebooked his BA shuttle flight from LHR to GLA to the first avaliable flight from MAN to GLA… a bmi flight… but obviously, BA wan’t having that, so booked him in under an LH flight number.) Now… who can tell me who I phone to find out what time he’ll arrive home tonight so I can have him met at the airport? BA? bmi? LH?

    in reply to: Boeing… a bit P'ed off at Iberia. #678252
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: Boeing… a bit P’ed off at Iberia.

    four engines 4 long haul. the 777’s a piece of junk 😉

    And that’s a shocking statement for Boeing to make… wake up and smell the coffee, design a new plane for once. You can’t keep rehashing 60’s designs endlessly (ok, credit for the 777, but I think most pax (self loading cargo, if you will) prefer the 2-4-2 of the 340 to the 2-5-2 of the 777.)

    in reply to: LHR-GLA flight emergency landing at MAN last night. #678990
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: LHR-GLA flight emergency landing at MAN last night.

    MAN-GLA is operated by both BA and bmi with ERJ145’s.

    in reply to: LHR-GLA flight emergency landing at MAN last night. #679461
    Bhoy
    Participant

    RE: LHR-GLA flight emergency landing at MAN last night.

    I’m not sure which actual flight it was… but the evening flights from LHR to GLA are scheduled for 737-400’s on the 18:15/19:20 shuttles, with A320’s operating the 17:15 and 20:25 shuttles. (the 16:25 is an A319)

Viewing 15 posts - 1,411 through 1,425 (of 2,052 total)