dark light

FL517

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Control Grip Help #1153642
    FL517
    Participant

    Control wheel ID

    I can confirm that it’s a DC-3 / C-47 control wheel (part number 5117125)- will fit both pilot & co-pilots side of the control column. The worn area on the upper right arm is from a post-war mounting bracket for a microphone switch.

    Rich

    in reply to: Parachute Harness #827891
    FL517
    Participant

    PM sent regarding the XType and one of the Observer packs.

    Rich

    in reply to: Dakota IV control surfaces and paradoor questions #779493
    FL517
    Participant

    I’ve (hopefully!) attached an image showing the areas which should have been masked off for drops using the British X-type parachute. [ATTACH=CONFIG]252109[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Dakota IV control surfaces and paradoor questions #779864
    FL517
    Participant

    The November 1944 edition of the USAAF Handbook – Flight Operating Instructions for the C-47 states the following:

    Parachute Troop Exit Panel

    On some airplanes the inside panel of the forward half of the main cargo door is removable inward and is used as the exit for parachute troops. Four hooks and bungee rings installed on the right-hand side of the fuselage, opposite the main cargo loading door, are provided for stowing the panel while using the exit”

    Whilst the RAF made certain modifications for British Airborne operations (re-positioned static line cable, mats on the cabin floor, masking of external fittings, etc), I can find no evidence of the RAF modifying the jump panel stowage.

    in reply to: Foreign Officers in post war RAF service ? #840524
    FL517
    Participant

    The mystery ribbon is the French Croix de Guerre with bronze palm.

    in reply to: Brabazon hangar not listed #967852
    FL517
    Participant

    Filton

    To continue on from Proteus6’s comments, the WW1 buildings are currently fenced off from the rest of the site. The Bristol Aero collection is busy moving it’s exhibits from Kemble into the WW1 hangars. In the meantime, the airfield itself is being asset stripped / dismantled in preparation for re-development.

    The both the Police helicopter & Air Ambulance continue to operate from the north side & will do so for some time to come.

    in reply to: Dakota/DC-3 Prop control? #976263
    FL517
    Participant

    C-47 prop pitch control lever

    Rob,

    You’re exactly right, it’s a “lever assembly, propellor pitch control, LH, inboard (as it states in the -4 parts manual!). Located in the upper section of the control pedestal.

    Standard wartime produced part for the C-47 series in the original zinc chromate primer finish.

    Hope this helps

    Rich

    in reply to: Red preservative on RAF aircraft parts #1053105
    FL517
    Participant

    Gents,

    Thank you all very much for taking the time to post your replies. I guessed that the answer to my question would be here within hours & you haven’t disappointed me!

    Now off to the garage to put your suggestions into practice..

    Thanks again

    Rich

    in reply to: Filton housing gets approval #1054966
    FL517
    Participant

    English Heritage visited the site a week or so ago & examined the 3 combined RFC aeroplane sheds & the two small adjacent hangars (currently used by the Air Ambulance & to store airfield vehicles). Rumour is that they have been / will be listed & will form the nucleus of a Bristol themed aircraft museum (not holding my breath, but the location could be a winner if it ever went ahead) which will incorporate the decaying Concorde. If you’ve ever wondered what those aeroplane sheds look like inside, they’re the same as the ones at Duxford (just not so well maintained).

    As ever, various rumours persist regarding potential buyers of the site who may continue to use it as an airfield, but the generally accepted view is that flying will cease next December. How long it takes for redevelopment to begin is anyones guess. I foresee several years of stagnation & decay before the site bulldozed & covered in “social housing”.

    in reply to: C47 Serial No ? #1118197
    FL517
    Participant

    C-47 fuselage identity

    The aircraft is / was constructors number 10100 / USAAF 42-24238 / RAF FL517 / G-AJAZ / EC-ADR / T3-61 / N8041B / “N569R”

    I’m currently restoring it’s cockpit section & have put together a little website detailing it’s history, etc;

    http://www.dakotarestoration.com

    Hope this helps!

    Rich

    in reply to: 511 Squadron Loss 6/10/46 #1093903
    FL517
    Participant

    511 Sqn

    Icare9,

    A little off topic, but would does the 511 Sqn history detail the fate of their Dakota fleet when they moved to Liberator / York only operations? I understand this was in July 1944.

    My main focus is Dakota 111 FL517, which is shown as having been received on squadron strength on 17/9/43 (with no further details then until March 1946).

    Is there a source for obtaining the Sqn history as I’d love to know a little more about this aircrafts use whilst with the unit?

    Many thanks

    Rich

    in reply to: British DC3's #1218121
    FL517
    Participant

    British Dakotas

    I can’t comment on the very early (impressed civilian) Dakotas in RAF service, but the standard Dakota 111 & 1V (C-47A & C-47B) allocated to the RAF appear to have been delivered with full US produced instrumentation & radio equipment. After delivery, there were upgrades to bring it up to the then current operational specification (I believe most of it was carried out at Prestwick, with some work being carried out in the US) prior to squadron allocation.

    The RAF Dakota pilots notes have a photo section at the rear & the only deviation I can see from a standard USAAF example is an adaptor at each headset / microphone point to enable the RAF single plug equipment to be used. The oxygen, radio & instrumentation is all standard USAAF. The wartime C-47 parts manuals, flight handbooks, maintenance manuals, etc all state that they apply to the RAF Dakota 11, 111, etc & there is no mention of any alternative equipment fit, etc.

    I have examples of USAAF instrumentation which have RAF stores tags. These tags carry both the original US part number & an RAF part number. It would have been difficult (& a bit pointless) to exchange the US instruments for UK produced ones (& thats not to say that an UK produced equivilant was ever produced?).

    With regard to post war Dakotas, most ex-RAF examples appear to have been processed through Scottish Aviation at Prestwick & I would imagine much of the wartime operational equipment would have been removed as redundant. I’ve no idea what would have been fitted in the radio operators position, but the instrumentation would have been retained & upgaded progressively from then on.

    in reply to: G Type Oxygen Mask Fitting. #1174489
    FL517
    Participant

    G-type oxygen mask

    Kev35, you’re spot on. The microphone is secured into the mask housing by the type of clip you describe, but I’ve no idea of it’s exact name. It’s a very different set up from the later H-type. This clip also secures two “ends” of the web harness & ensures that it fits correctly when worn.

    You may want to watch e-bay for this part. Sometimes a few “parts” lots are listed when the masks themselves have perished beyond redemption. Alternatively, contact David Farnsworth at http://www.historicflyingclothing.com. He may have the part you’re after or know how to source one. You may also want to post on the RAF collectors forum at http://www.network54.com/Forum/180748/

    Good luck!

    Rich

    in reply to: Gutersloh night fighter base #1165381
    FL517
    Participant

    Gutersloh

    I would add that if anyones interested in visiting any of these sites, do it now. Lots of wartime sites in Germany survived extremely well into the 90’s (occupied by NATO forces), but the withdrawl of British & US forces has left many of them empty. The German planning authorities appear to have as much consideration for historical sites from this era as ours do, & I’ve been stunned by the number that have disappeared over the last few years. If you don’t believe me, just see how the Obersalzburg has changed in the past 5 years!

    in reply to: Gutersloh night fighter base #1165388
    FL517
    Participant

    Gutersloh

    I was at Gutersloh for 3 years in the late 80’s & recall that the original Luftwaffe infrastructure was largely intact (original hangars, admin & living accomodation, etc). Pretty well everywhere you went there was evidence of it’s wartime use (the stairwell to the celler in my block was still signposted “luftschultzkellerei” in german script for instance). The station HQ still had the words “Freiherr Von Richthofen Haus” carved above the entrance door! I wouldn’t hesitate to say that Gutersloh was the best station I served at & the “liberated” Luftwaffe accomodation was a large factor in that (cracking facilities, room, size, heating, etc)

    Across town was the former Luftwaffe Barracks (then called Mansergh Barracks & occupied by the Royal Artillery). The main gate still had the large luftwaffe eagle carved in stone (with the swastika in it’s claws neatly chipped away).

    Should you ever visit the Technik Museum at Speyer, they have a very resonable on-site hotel which is a former Luftwaffe accomodation block (as indeed the whole site is part of a former Luftwaffe airfield)

    A good site for comparing “then & now” in Germany is at the following;

    http://www.thirdreichruins.com

    It’s quite suprising what you can find over there!

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)