dark light

phrozenflame

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 988 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Defence News thread #2696628
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    $23 million is a very logical price of LCA, the price may come down with introduction of more indigenous key components like Engine.

    in reply to: SLightly OT- India test fires Israeli LAHAT from Arjun #2696629
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Tanks firing ATGMs is nothing special…and Tandem warheads in Anti-tank roles is also nothing new..the only interesting piece of news is Israel’s involvement, which isnt, shocking anyway..with thousands of ATGMs on every side, I dont know how long the tanks will survive these days…arright Iraq is a special case..its RPG vs 70 ton monster…even that makes the crew bleed.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2696774
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by Wolverine
    Su30 series are awhole different bunch of aircraft meant for heavier loads and longer range. so what are you going to do wit the FC1? make a customer specific larger version of it?

    I was talking about Avionics.

    in reply to: JSF-F-35 and the Future #2696781
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    First Tyhpoon rolled out 100 million was it? F-22 is somewhere at <200 million…now JSF should be somewhere between.

    35-40 million..ya sure…as true as Iraq’s WMDs

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2696782
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Wolverine, just see the type of offensive posture you use, and then you you say why you get flame..there’s a word called ‘decency’ in English Dictionary.

    Fc-1 offers nothing new??? Depends upon the customer…So what new stuff Su-27 offers? well..Su-30MKx…see the difference.

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2696844
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Yeup, PAK seriously needs mid-high alt SAMS..point 2 and 3 have all ready made news..

    4 and 5 looks logical..point 5..it might come in with full ToT…or may not come at all..thats what i think.

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2696848
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by crobato
    The “10” is in Chinese. It’s that cross like symbol in the book.

    dont you think every word there looks something like what you said??? :rolleyes:

    @Crobato: If I’m right, Griffo had planned to propose Griffo-2000 for J-10 to China, seems like Chinese arent interested…how would one compare Griffo-2000 to RC-400, offcourse earlier one being superior..just want to see the difference…they also used G2k on F-16 MLU program back home..?

    in reply to: What's wrong with the Ching-Kuo airplane? #2696850
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Politics is the worse thing happened on Earth, after Humans.

    anyways, what are the advantages of these ‘diamond’ like wings you see on F-22s and F-CK-1 ?? and disadvantages??

    in reply to: I look for videos MPEG, AVI of fighter jets #2696854
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    posted b4, posting again:

    http://www.voodoo.cz/falcon/an/falcon_combat.avi

    This one is for Erez 😉

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2696935
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Will China Allow (in future) for PAF to buy J-10 with Western Avionics??? It would do wonders for PAF, would be highly cost effective 4rth gen fighter.

    in reply to: What's wrong with the Ching-Kuo airplane? #2696963
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    I heard engines arent that responsive…not sure tho..

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697102
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by SD-10
    You didnot get the point. I would rather pound the enemy

    with heaviest PGMs rather than numerous lighter pin pricks.

    Flankers and J-10s are most efficient in Strike role. Using them for

    escorting duties is pure waste of large fighter ability.

    Now with AWACS in the game the advantage of bigger radars

    of heavy weight fighters is minimized in Air to Air role.

    no no, u’r missing the point, J-10 and Flankers can strike and defend themselves as well!! They dont need escorts. But fe escorts are worth it..why loose J-10 when you can cover it up with Fc-1…and both planes can go home happily.

    and as you said sending them to escort is useless, J-h7as are good bombers i feel, but not fighters really, not that agile (thats what ppl say on forums, no sure okay), so J-h7As will need escorts, thats where Fc-1 comes in…unless F-7mf comes in..but i believe China should end its obsession with mig-21 and there varients..i.e. F-7mf.

    FC-1 costs 15m with Western avionics, and with Chinese..its around $12m, now if China goes for mass production, Economies of Scale can take the price even more down.

    I think its about time for F-7mf vs Fc-1 thread..

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697109
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Flanker and J-10s can holdthere own againstenemy planes when on strike missions, I doubt JH-7a has the luxury of doing that, firing of BVR is not everything, so maybe FC-1s can be used to provide cover for JH-7as which will go for some strike missions

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697187
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    (remember to ignore)

    anyone knows the RCS of SD-10?? and of meteor and aim-120 for sake of comparison…

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2697217
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    one was posted just few days ago..it was not the ‘final’ f-7mf, but mig-21 with air intake under the nose…so basically a development stage of f-7mf

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 988 total)