Gripen is a Swedish aircraft. SAAB led overall development. Volvo Flygmotor (now Volvo Aero) led development of the Gripen A/B/C/D engine. Ericsson (now SAAB-Ericsson) developed the radar. Etc. But the engine was a local variant of the GE F404, the radar was developed with technology from the GEC-Marconi Blue Vixen – and so on, and so on.
See what I’m getting at? Aircraft manufacturers don’t build complete aeroplanes. They do overall design, & integrate components from external suppliers. SAAB is one of the most extreme examples of the aircraft company as systems integrator, buying in more than it makes itself – though much of what it buys in is designed, or modified, specifically for the aircraft.
Do you see what I’m getting at? Brazil can be responsible for design of the Gripen F & M, while only doing a minority of the work. SAAB’s worked like that for quite a while.
Very well with this explanation about the complexity in the developing process for such advanced aircraft like the Gripen ABCD NG.
However I have disagreed about Brazil capabilities to participate even at minor part in the design process of some version from Gripen NG , since all of the supply chain that has been approved for SAAB a long time ago, and those suppliers has already mastered the knowledge or technology in its respective areas, while Brazil has been seeking the knowledge and technology for it , and only in the future the Brazil could be capable to design by it self some item advanced for the Gripen NG.
So until 2024 the Brazil would be inserted in the learning curve from Gripen NG, yet it can deliver up some items for Gripen NG, but under the supervision from SAAB that has already designed and approved the same parts.
Thus only in 2024 according to the schedule would be when the Brazil should be completed the phase from technology transfer process. it will occurs when the last Gripen NG would left the production line in Brazil , then it might be able to design and approve item for such complex aircraft like the Gripen NG.
But this will never occur in my humble opinion in reason of the economic feasibility for creating a second production line in Brazil to manufacture only 15 aircraft just like it has been reported so far, once the cost of those 15 Gripen NG in Brazil would be much higher due at the investment has been needed to create this new production line in Brazil.
So in 2018 someone in high position from the Brazil Government will cancel this second line in Brazil to decrease the cost from the Gripen Program, and at best possibility the remains 15 Gripen NG will be manufactured in Sweden .
The best part in my humble opinion would be in 2018 when this same person will be called a genius for saving those resources, and in middle of enthusiastic applause’s this same person will mention that resources has been saved from Gripen NG will be invested in some project has been created to reduce poverty in Brazil.
This is just my opinion, and from time to time I also make mistakes, after all I do not even remotely such clever as the Swede who gave me this advice: Expect the best, but always you should have been prepared for the worst.
By another coincidence he was from Lidkoping city.
Are you trolling right now? Because I seriously can’t tell.
Have you forgotten that Brazil will be lead developers on Gripen F and Sea Gripen? All Gripen Fs are to be manufactured by Brazil. How is that not technology transfer?
I just have been realistic and maybe a little sarcastic too, after all someone very clever, and by coincidence Swedish too, had gave me this advice long time ago: Expect the best, but always you should have been prepared for the worst.
Because of this I have this following question:
How Brazil could lead the development from the Gripen F or even the proposed Sea Gripen if Brazil or Embraer does not have the knowledge and technology for this task today as well as in the next years, once it should be only in 2024 that the process of technology transfer would complete when Brazil could deliver the latest Gripen NG in 2024 with 40% from those parts, that at the best possibility, would have been produced in Brazil?
Despite a lot of things there are a significant differences between has been developing something like the Gripen NG and to produce the same at fully already developed specifications, anyway both Brazil and Embraer despite all its competence has never developed or even produced a supersonic fighter, so in my humble opinion it would not be realistic until 2024 at least.
This my simplistic and naive hint have been based on the fact that until now there are an indication that only 15 Gripen NG will be produced in Brazil until 2024, with respect for the Gripen F that would be used by the Sweden Air Force until this moment I do not know if those will be produced in Brazil, anyway it would be interesting if something like that could happen in the future.
But until this remote future I do not believe there is economic viability to create a production line in Brazil to manufacture only 15 Gripen NG, and if the Gripen NG will not produced in Brazil the technology transfer actually would never happened.
Some new detail about Gripen NG :
Among important issues, the revelation of the production plan, which provides that only 15 of the 36 aircraft will be built entirely in Brazil, and the first 21 partially built in Sweden, with the final production line in the country, at Embraer. The initial estimate of delivery is the first game for 2019 (without full multirole integration, and weapons systems), and the latter for 2024 (being the time all aircraft declared full-capable with full functional integration).
So Gripen NG FOC is expected to be in 2024, 10 years from now.
Anyway a production line at Embraer to assemble only 15 aircrafts should be uneconomic at least, therefore would not be surprised that in the end all Gripen NG will be assemble in Sweden if Brazil fails to attract new customers for the Gripen NG in South America.
20% cost increase + 40% built in Brazil = 0% technology transfer for Brazil
Contract is signed!
The Gripen NG Contract has been signed one day after the end of the election from Brazil Presidency, and as the result of the election in Brazil with its 140 million voters were released in few hours after the end of the election on Sunday that was 26 , due to the highly advanced electronic elections process in Brazil, the present president that has been reelected it was the same that has been decided by the purchase of the Gripen NG in 2013.
Why have not signed the contract even before the elections once the decision had been known for more than a year?If the present president were not reelected then it would not approve the contract with Gripen NG?
It could have been just a coincidence. But when it involves transactions in the defense industry, particularly because of the Gripen NG has not become operational and is still in the prototype phase …
France has been a highly developed nation and therefore has a remarkable reputation with it press that covering events around the World that should be in my opinion more than enough to justify it.
Yet could be another small detail may have also contributed for this once that Embraer company has important French companies with considerable shareholders from that, so the success of the KC 390 should be shared with France.
The most pure coincidence has been appeared in Brazil in reason of the next Sunday there will be elections for the Brazil Presidency , and with sure the date from roll out of the KC 390 one week before the election was a coincidence , once the roll out of the KC 390 were not scheduled to benefit the current president of Brazil that are running for reelection.
After all with important French companies owning large part of Embraer would be no reason for this.
At present another major challenge for the Gripen NG could be sold to Argentina would be the financing issue from this acquisition, once the Brazil has been apparently obtained a long-term loan that in these conditions the Brazil will only start paying the Gripen NG in 2024.
Already in french web press… Wondering why?
France has been a highly developed nation and therefore has a remarkable reputation with it press that covering events around the World that should be in my opinion more than enough to justify it.
Yet could be another small detail may have also contributed for this once that Embraer company has important French companies with considerable shareholders from that, so the success of the KC 390 should be shared with France.
but is a pretty expensive solution with low time on station?
Really an AC-130 … like some people have suggested would be great with a 105mm howitzer and a 30mm backup as well as some brimstone type of thing to round things out. 3-4 of these flying around the vast desert / valleys would keep the IS terrorists on their toes.
As far as I could remember the former Soviet Union had not been trialed or even built any gunship like the AC 130 in its long war in Afghanistan during the 80s.
By the way the Su 34 Fullback that has been designed since the 80s even during the Afghanistan War. This strike aircraft has been keeping all the advantages from a supersonic fighter, as well as a long fly endurance for its crew like the AC 130 that could be math through air refueling . Also the Su 34 has been equipping with armor for its crew , what could be very useful in case when should be necessary attack at low altitude as the CAS ( Close Air Support) missions.
Maybe among several missions had been planned for the Su 34 Fullback by the former Soviet Union would be something like the Afghanistan War with its wide threat from MANPADS as the FIM 92 Stinger, about this the Su 34 Fullback could fulfill in several aspects the AC 130 missions without any restrains from this .
Just for emphasizing the commentary the Su 34 were apparently trialed in Chechnya by Russia in the late 90s , and the performance from the Su 34 in this conflict had ensured the resources for its development by the bankrupt Russia at this time.
Cairo West AB and H 3 AB – Part I
LGB Paveway III under the wing of the Tornado GR 1
Image from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Paveway_ILA06.JPGDuring the First Gulf War in order to destroy the hardened targets of the Iraq, the Tornados GR 1 armed with LGB Paveway III had launched its weapons from an altitude of 7.140m, which due to sophisticated ground mapping radar that could detect the HAS in any condition atmospheric at long range and altitude. With this target on the ground mapping radar and its inertial navigation system allowed the f computer from Tornados GR 1 to calculate the launch point from LGB Paveway III in order to put this weapons in a ballistic trajectory allowing turning the altitude and initial velocity input by the Tornado in high final velocity when the LGB reached the target. By increasing the velocity at impact by 25% would increase the Kinetic Energy of the LGB Paveway by almost 60%, which would penetrate deeper into the target before detonation, which would increase the damage caused by it LGB .
In the first Gulf War in 1991, those trapezoidal HAS built by former Yugoslav companies during the 80s were destroyed only after several attacks by several types of aircrafts as: F 111F, Tornado GR1 and F 15E that were armed with LGB Paveway III as BSU 109 with 2000 lb. / 907 kg .
Since after the first impact with this LGB, a second LGB were aimed to the same point left by the impact for the previous attack, and because the accuracy of Paveway III much better than the Paveway II which had Iran during the war against Iraq during the 80s, its second Paveway III had been practically impacting on the already point damaged and weakened of the structure of concrete from HAS, thereby allowing the second impact penetrate and destroy the HAS, as well as any aircraft that were within them.
The Coalition led by USA in the first Gulf War had conducted more than 3,000 missions against Air Bases from Iraq, which had resulted in the destruction of 375 HAS of the approximately 594 HAS that Iraq had at the beginning of the First Gulf War. To ensure that the HAS were destroyed, several mission were demanded with this purpose, which had demonstrated the strength thereof of those HAS and its bases.
If the purpose of the use of penetrating LGB before detonation, the best way of achieving this would hit the target perpendicular at the surface , which considerably decrease the thickness of the protection from the target, beyond which an impact at a smaller angle than 90 ° would cause a deviation in the trajectory LGB at impact, which could reduces greatly the capability to penetrate inside the target causing more superficial damages, which could mean that HAS were able to operate and maintain the aircraft protected inside. The LGB Paveway III had besides the laser head seeker another guidance system as inertial navigation kit that allowed the LGB to remain in the designated trajectory even hasn’t located the marked target with the laser emission. This feature allows the LGB Paveway III to control its dive angle toward the target, which could increase their effectiveness in penetrating a target, as in the case of BSU 109.

In 1991 the US-led Coalition had found out high level of difficulty about destroying the hardened and underground facilities from Iraq in 1991. Even the US with its remarkable and new weaponry of precision-guided weapons in the beginning of the 90’s it had been proved inadequate in dealing with those hardened targets. In face of this problem there was an emergency project that had been creating the GBU 28 Bunker Buster in few moths and it were used in 1991 against the hardened and underground facilities from Iraq in the end of the war.
However in 1991 the US-led Coalition, without the GBU 28 at disposal in the beginning of the war, it had developed a simple but effective method of employing multiple laser-guided bombs as the GBU-10 Paveway III kit with the BLU 109 that were designed to destroy hardened targets .
The GBU 10 should hit in several times the same specific part of the hardened structure, as soon as possible to avoid that could be repaired, in the almost same spot of the hardened structure that had previously been damaged in the first attacks with GBU 10 .
After those first attacks against this structure that would be weakened in these specific area, which would allow those subsequent attacks with GBU 10 to penetrate inside of the hardened structure and destroying it.
The 5th Generation of Stealth Fighters as the F 22 has been flying in active service since 2005, but in reason of the project of the F 22A that had started as interceptor, the F 22 has been not equipped with bombs with mass of the 2000 lbs as the GBU 10 Paveway or GBU-31 JDAM , once these guided bombs could not be transported internally in its bomb bays. Indeed the size of those guided bombs will not fit inside those compartments; the same has been applied with GBU 28.
Thus the most important targets in could not be hit by it most advanced fighters from 5th Generation as the F 22A in it main strike mode that will the Stealth profile, once those guided bombs as GBU 31 JDAM or GBU 10 Paveway with BLU 109 only could be transported in the external hard points from F 22 that will compromised the Stealth profile.
This problem has become especially disturbing after 2005 in reason of the removal from active service of the F 117A Nighthawk that had the capability to carry two guided bombs with 2000 lbs in its bomb bay like the BLU 109.
Due to this limitation in the active F 22A , the USAF may have been adopted a new combination of guided bombs JDAM with mass of the 1000lbs that could be carried in its bomb bay from F 22A, and probably the first time that were trialed in real condition maybe it were against the ISIL in Syria as indeed has been happening since the September 23.
The purpose of this combination of JDAM could have been created to strike hardened and/or underground targets just like the GBU 28 would be capable with another fighter like the F 15E Strike Eagle.
However the F 22 Raptor has been keeping in advantage over the F-117 Nighthawk in reason of the supersonic cruise speed or Supercruise, which in the case of the F 22A allows it to launch the JDAM at supersonic speed, which increases the range of the JDAM or even the penetration capability against such hardened target, and when compared with the F 15E, the F 22A has been achieved a high advantage in reason of the Stealth profile.
The method has been achieved with two GBU 32 JDAM with mass bomb of the 1000lbs, in this case such system would be similar as the GBU-28 with mass of the 4500lbs, once the GBU 28 were designed to penetrate deep into a structure before detonation of the larger explosive charge.
In this case of the GBU 32 with 1000lbs it would not be possible, even if the GBU 32 would be equipped with AUP( Advanced Unit Penetration) or Ballasted Penetration that would be capable to penetrate deeply in the hardened and/or underground target.
Joint Strike Fighter F 35A/C Lightning 
http://www.armchairgeneral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=96716[/CENTER]
Note: the F 35 A / C has been developing with capability to carry two GBU 31 with BLU 109 of 2000lbs that could be used against hardened targets, while the F 35B has been limited for two GBU 31 with 1000lbs bombs. Despite this better capability from F 35A/C over the F 22A as regard the strike missions, since the F 35A/C has been equipped with heavy weaponry that could be in its internal compartments, the F 22 has been achieved a stealth capability in all aspects, while F 35A / B / C are Stealth only in the forward plane, what in strike missions against the highly protected targets the Stealth capability from F 22A are certainly an advantage over the F 35A/B/C.
The limitation from this version of the GBU 32 would be absence of such huge mass of the high explosive , with this restrain about the mass from high explosive charge would cause less damage against the target, in special if this target were large with several compartments or levels.
Then would be necessary at least two JDAM with 1000lbs bombs to obtain something that could match with the single GBU 28 with 4500lbs, in this case the first JDAM should reach the target with function to penetrate deeply with kinetic charge as the Ballasted Penetrator in this process would have been tunneling through the structure or ground until the designate target or the critical part from this.
The second JDAM that could be designed as second stage would reach the target after the first JDAM had been hit with penetrating charge. Then the second JDAM could detonate its thermo baric charge into the breach had been created by the first JDAM.
The thermo baric charge would be injected inside the structure and could travel through its the interior causing the destruction of the same, once that due this thermo baric charge will mix with the oxygen present in the atmosphere of the structure that will create such high temperature and pressure that would destroy much what could be inside from this target.
The limitation so far from this method should be the high level from accuracy that has been required for this second guided bomb or JDAM to hit the breach, in reason this the second guided bomb should be able to look on such target less than half meter or few ft, that were made by the first impact of the JDAM with a kinetic charge like the Ballasted Penetration.
However a second generation of the JDAM with more advanced and accurate GPS/INS tail kit and more important about all, with terminal seeker with IIR (Imaging Infra Red) as DAMASK that indeed it has been testing since 2005 with an accuracy CEP from 2 fts against the designed spot.
In this case the JDAM with DAMASK (Direct Attack Munitions Affordable Seeker) that will operate like a terminal seeker of IIR could be programmed before the mission to search and lock on the Infra Red Signature from breach had been created by the first JDAM.
After the JDAM DAMASK had been hit the breach in the entrance point it will detonate its thermo baric charge through this breach or tunnel, then it would transform the interior of the structure into the combustion chamber.
With goal to increase the effectiveness of this attack it would be more appropriate if it second GBU 32 JDAM DAMASK could be load with thermo baric charge rather a high explosive charge, once the relative small charge of the 1000lbs with load HE( High Explosive) would create almost localized damage over the impact area, while a thermo baric charge would flow through the breach or tunnel into of the target.

Note:the first pair of JDAM has been hit the building on the opposite sides, and the sequence of images would be possible to visualize the projection of debris while the bombs go through all levels of the building, as well as probably some of the same underground level

Note:the second pair of JDAM probably with IIR terminal seeker reach it seems the breaches from the impact of the first pair of JDAM on the opposite sides from the building. Could be possible to visualize that there were not a significant explosion had been resulting from the first couple of JDAM, only projection of debris and smoke coming through the both breaches and from sides of the building.

Note: after the impact of the last bomb from second pair of JDAM, it would be possible to visualize a primary blast that launched a cloud out of the building. In this case the thermobaric charge would be at this moment had been mixing with Oxygen from the atmosphere, and the sequence happened a powerful explosion. Because of this it would be possible that both JDAM had been simultaneously detonated to avoid that the first explosion from the first thermobaric bomb disperse the load of the second bomb, and in reason of this eventually the second bomb will not detonate inside the building

Note:this simple building could be a camouflage to allow conceals access as well the ventilation shafts to the underground facilities. Once most of the underground facilities should be equipped with entrance for persons or vehicles, and for them to use an underground facility that same has been certainly equipped with ventilation shafts, what could be detected by reconnaissance aircrafts or satellites and in reason of that the secret of the facilities would be compromised. Through the images would be possible to visualize that two JDAM had hit virtually the same point on the structure with extreme precision.
| width: 700 | class: grid | align: center |
|---|---|---|
| [tr] | ||
| [td]1. The first pair of JDAM[/td] | ||
| [td]https://picasaweb.google.com/110339878419724313454/F22Section14#6069510576082395634[/td] | ||
| [/tr] | ||
| [tr] | ||
| [td]2. The second pair of JDAM [/td] | ||
| [td]https://picasaweb.google.com/110339878419724313454/F22Section24#6069171878824491378[/td] | ||
| [/tr] | ||
| [tr] | ||
| [td]3. The detonation of the thermobaric charge[/td] | ||
| [td]https://picasaweb.google.com/110339878419724313454/F22Section44#6069521308437224370[/td] | ||
| [/tr] | ||
| [tr] | ||
| [td]4. The damage from the JDAM [/td] | ||
| [td]https://picasaweb.google.com/110339878419724313454/F22Section34#6069523640595434562[/td] | ||
| [/tr] |
The CAS ( Close Air Support) such as the A 10 Thunderbolt II and the Su-25 Flogfoot could realize in the war has a meaning that has been little known out of the battlefield that is to raise the morale of the troops that fighting on the ground.
Especially in a conflict with insurgents, once one of the most used tactics should be to conduct ambushes against small contingents of officials troops on the ground.
In this case can have an aircraft that would fly at low altitude and it could be exposed to enemy fire just as the troops on the ground, in that circumstances that tactic to operate at low altitude could brings a wide confidence to the ground troops, just as the enemy like insurgents could be intimidated by the freedom of action from those aircraft’s like the A 10 and Su 25 that it will fly and strike over their heads, which could cause a drop in morale from insurgents, and among their even defections.
In this case the A 10 and the Su-25 has had such advantage over other fighter that would be a remarkable capability to withstand heavy battle damage, which also contributes to lower the morale from insurgents by the apparent inability to bring down those ‘ugly’ and ‘dirty’ fighters.
Nothing wrong with spending some time in Linkoping.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]232223[/ATTACH]
I remember a silly story about someone that had been sent at Linkoping to obtain some knowledge about an item, and his spent two weeks in the factory of Linkoping for its purpose.
On his return the only thing that it had brought with his baggage were low quality photos about the item, even at the despite of the same had free access to technical documentation and could obtain without any kind of problem this, but his only brought the damn photos.
When it were asked about the photos, once it could have been obtained at any trade exhibition around the planet, and in reason of that would not be necessary to travel at the factory, he answered: I get so distracted with my camera in Linkoping and because this I had forgotten to ask by the drawings about the item.
I hope that Brazil did not send a hundred from distracted professionals at Linkoping , however if it will happen it’s best to anticipate and buy new powerful HD in Brazil to store all the photos about the Gripen NG.
Each aircraft type has been identified by its radar signature, however among others also has an own acoustic signature.
Maybe should important to remember that the human ear only picks up a narrow strip of all sound frequencies, so would be possible for an expert to determine the distances at which it were created the sonic boon once some frequencies degrade with higher intensity at the rate about which expands the distance between the receiver and the emitter from the sound source, as well as could be possible to estimate by its expert which aircraft design that would be the source of the sonic boom.
I guess that would be almost impossible to find any expert will do this madness, once that employers from those experts has not been interested in this subject.
Someone might say: There is more in sound than meet the human ears.
However the most deficiency from human ears should be that they has developed the ability to isolate a specific sound about what it has been created a higher affinity and thereby ignoring other sounds from the environment.
In animals this is certainly an advantage, however in humans it has been bringing more problems than solutions since we are a species that makes and likes politics, and this is such powerful instrument to create sound that can deafen us even when there is something else roaring beside us.
By the way I am looking at video where we can hear the sonic boom of different fighters.
Each aircraft type has been identified by its radar signature, however among others also has an own acoustic signature.
Maybe should important to remember that the human ear only picks up a narrow strip of all sound frequencies, so would be possible for an expert to determine the distances at which it were created the sonic boon once some frequencies degrade with higher intensity at the rate about which expands the distance between the receiver and the emitter from the sound source, as well as could be possible to estimate by its expert which aircraft design that would be the source of the sonic boom.
I guess that would be almost impossible to find any expert will do this madness, once that employers from those experts has not been interested in this subject.
Someone might say: There is more in sound than meet the human ears.
bringing F-22 to drop bombs on hooligans is a sales-pitch/pep-talk to the tax payer
I guess the purpose about the F 22A Raptor had been using in this mission were to demonstrate its new capability to strike targets that could be hardened underground bunkers as command facilities or something else.
In this case from Syria should be no need to employ the F 22A, but elsewhere in the world this may be as :mandatory.
So I could argue that mission had been conducted only as demonstration of the F 22A, with purpose to discourage some opponents that still has been thinking that those hardened underground facilities could not be attacked by F 22A.
Probably the first impacts has been done by a kinetic charge in order to cross the concrete structure with propose to hit a possible underground level.
The second impact could be created by a device with a thermobaric charge, since the explosion spread to the sides of the building as if it the internal structure of the same had been deflected the thermobaric charge. However the purpose of the first impact was to open such breach for the thermobaric charge reaches the lower levels of the structure, possibly some underground shelter.
If this mission was done by F 22 Raptor could demonstrate its capability to attack reinforced structures such as underground bunker .
In this mission the F 22A Raptor could have been using two different guided bombs with separate goals, once the volume restrains from its bomb bay has limited the size of the guided bombs that could be carried internally without affect the STEALTH mode.
About this case instead of using guided bombs like the BLU 109 with a mass of 2000lbs (907 kg) that would be incompatible with your internal compartment or bomb bay from F 22A Raptor, or even a larger GBU 28 Bunker Booster with mass of 5000lbs( 2268 Kg), the F 22 would be carrying two smaller guided bombs.
The F 22A could have been equipped with two guided bombs in its bomb bay with mass of the 1000lbs( 450 kg), and the first could be a simple JDAM to breach the structure and the second could be a JDAM with precision terminal guidance seeker, and that case should be a Laser or even Imaging Infra Red seeker that could accurately guided the second bomb with thermobaric charge to the hole created by the first impact.
Not actually sure what that ISIS compound was hit with. Almost appeared to make two small holes and then drop other bombs inside them.
Probably the first impacts has been done by a kinetic charge in order to cross the concrete structure with propose to hit a possible underground level.
The second impact could be created by a device with a thermobaric charge, since the explosion spread to the sides of the building as if it the internal structure of the same had been deflected the thermobaric charge. However the purpose of the first impact was to open such breach for the thermobaric charge reaches the lower levels of the structure, possibly some underground shelter.
If this mission was done by F 22 Raptor could demonstrate its capability to attack reinforced structures such as underground bunker .
In this mission the F 22A Raptor could have been using two different guided bombs with separate goals, once the volume restrains from its bomb bay has limited the size of the guided bombs that could be carried internally without affect the STEALTH mode.
About this case instead of using guided bombs like the BLU 109 with a mass of 2000lbs (907 kg) that would be incompatible with your internal compartment or bomb bay from F 22A Raptor, or even a larger GBU 28 Bunker Booster with mass of 5000lbs( 2268 Kg), the F 22 would be carrying two smaller guided bombs.
The F 22A could have been equipped with two guided bombs in its bomb bay with mass of the 1000lbs( 450 kg), and the first could be a simple JDAM to breach the structure and the second could be a JDAM with precision terminal guidance seeker, and that case should be a Laser or even Imaging Infra Red seeker that could accurately guided the second bomb with thermobaric charge to the hole created by the first impact.