dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,876 through 1,890 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News and Updates #2263253
    MadRat
    Participant

    The simple fact is Typhoon is an F-15C peer in a jet two-thirds the footprint that doubles as the F-15E bomb truck without a dedicated airframe to each role. That is a substantial upgrade over what was previously operated.

    in reply to: Dassualt Mirage G-8 thread #2263479
    MadRat
    Participant

    TF-306 was a custom TF30 turbofan for Dassault until the M53 flew. No different than Rafale using F404 until M88 flew.

    The plan was for a small run (50-odd) of the Mirage G8 as a reconn plane. It had no useful load and the only picture I found with an underwing load was the G4 prototype. There is no indication the underwing pylons were pivotable on wing sweep changes. No box glove pylons. No internal bay. It’s utility was pretty low potential-wise.

    in reply to: Dassualt Mirage G-8 thread #2264110
    MadRat
    Participant

    I don’t think the Mirage G in any version studied (G, G4, G8) offered much in the room for external loads. It was more or less built around a capability rather than a pragmatic design. The G8 would have been too expensive to justify in any role for the French and it was replaced by something much more practical.

    in reply to: Weapons Loads – Harrier! #2264974
    MadRat
    Participant

    http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/middle/2/5/7/0737752.jpg

    in reply to: Shenyang J-21/31/F-60/AMF thread part 1 #2265617
    MadRat
    Participant

    3D printing isn’t for speedy work, its for incredible detail and consistency. I can program a cnc cutting table, the 3D process is about 50K times more granular.

    in reply to: Shenyang J-21/31/F-60/AMF thread part 1 #2265703
    MadRat
    Participant

    Looks milled. You wouldn’t go for a milled appearance with the 3D fabrication. Iraq’s minister of information must be working for them now.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2265836
    MadRat
    Participant

    http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/middle/1/1/0/0738011.jpg

    in reply to: Unique , unpopular bomb , missiles #2267247
    MadRat
    Participant
    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2267251
    MadRat
    Participant

    It looks rather dry compared to most peers. At least it looks alright from the front.

    http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/middle/5/7/7/0733775.jpg

    in reply to: PLAAF – Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2267340
    MadRat
    Participant

    It looks like a mockup. Perhaps it’s to test aerodynamics of it.

    in reply to: Unique , unpopular bomb , missiles #2267342
    MadRat
    Participant

    There is a forum strictly for this sort of topic.

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2267537
    MadRat
    Participant

    The black Typhoon would look nicer with Meteor semi-recessed and underwing ASRAAM.

    A ‘Black’ Typhoon. Very nice.

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v142/MikePix/Leuchars2000/TyphoonLeucharsZH588_zps216400a2.jpg

    Page 7 of this thread had this which is a good one to compare it with.
    http://previous.presstv.ir/photo/20110321/mazimi20110321002229140.jpg

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2268322
    MadRat
    Participant

    Why the difference between the F-15SE and F-35 packages?

    The deals are polar opposites with regard to cooperation. The F-35 is basically pay a lot and get no input. The F-15SE is basically pay much upfront and more cooperation.

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2268339
    MadRat
    Participant

    The preproduction PL-12 was short, the PL-12B was the produced version and is much longer, and the PL-12C is the Meteor equivalent using small ramjets. The picture depicts the preproduction PL-12 so I see no reason to suspect it is a Photoshop without decrypting all the timestamps in it. Its not worth the effort for a trivial issue.

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2268363
    MadRat
    Participant

    Why does a HARM on the inboard pylon not allow a self-defense AAM? In that photo, there seems to be clearance to me….

    The front fins of HARM obstruct an AAM drop off the triple rack. This is not an issue with belly mounted HARM.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,876 through 1,890 (of 4,651 total)