dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Su-15TM vs F-4E #2322344
    MadRat
    Participant

    Apples and oranges. Su-15 was designed from the beginning to be strictly a high speed and high altitude interceptor to make a head-on SARH missile attack and follow-up IRH attack from the rear quarters on SAC’s strategic bombers. MiG-23 was designed from the onset to be a look-down shoot-down fighter with beyond visual range targeting capabilities. One was tasked with targeting bulky and sluggish targets; and the other with attacking – while maneuvering – and doing so against much smaller-sized, nimble targets.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2324912
    MadRat
    Participant

    Only in closed test chambers.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2325408
    MadRat
    Participant

    I wouldn’t underestimate the sensitivity of those Chinese listening posts up in the mountains, nor ignore the idea of a satellite picking up signals. An overhead American spy satellite in low earth orbit back in the 70’s could easily pick up the Soviet – platoon level – hand held r126 FM radios. If they can pick up a signal that is normally limited to one or two klicks then imagine what they can do with signals of much higher frequencies and power.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2325814
    MadRat
    Participant

    You have to radiate and the signals will be picked up by listening posts on the ground and in the air. Why would one want to reveal their capabilities to the fullest extent on either platform?

    in reply to: Libyan Air Force – Resurrection #2326949
    MadRat
    Participant

    You will probably see them work on tactical needs to focus on internal security first. Like most revolutions, once it’s over the strongest leader asserts power over the lesser. I wouldn’t doubt they purchase Russian helicopters, maybe even used ones, as quickly as possible. Might even do the same for air transportation, which at this stage even an-12 would help move security personnel around. Whatever they go for in the next few years will be focused on desert operations to keep security on the oil fields. I’m thinking they buy used French fighters, possibly Mirage 2000’s.

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2328180
    MadRat
    Participant

    Sigint makes that impractical.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2330706
    MadRat
    Participant

    I’ve got a strong feeling the MiG-35 will look less MiG-29 in the future.

    in reply to: Sukhoi Swing-Wing Fitters in 2010? #2331753
    MadRat
    Participant

    They look rugged, but are they? Seems the ones used in actual combat didn’t fair too well when hit.

    in reply to: Der Pak-Fa Episode 17, return of the stealth #2370266
    MadRat
    Participant

    What’s the bulb behind the cockpit?

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2372150
    MadRat
    Participant

    I don’t see the J-8 getting exported as newer J-10/J-11 airframes replace them. The J-8 is probably too low tech and labor intensive to find a market for them, even when talking about the most sophisticated version. The PLAAF and PLAN are making a huge step forward in capability.

    Another thing, I can’t imagine the Chinese fuel costs aren’t soaring in this whole upgrade program. In the grand scheme of things this is their Achilles Heel.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2372338
    MadRat
    Participant

    I think your picture makes more for the argument it’s a seventy foot long behemoth. It’s turned at a pretty significant angle yet as long as the J-10. That’s a big plane.

    in reply to: Hot Dog Indian AF News and Discussion Part 17 #2372372
    MadRat
    Participant

    I imagine one could shrink the design and settle around the F100 to entice F-16 users into a Boeing JSF-lite if one was desperate for sales.

    in reply to: Indian M2K upgrade signed today #2372778
    MadRat
    Participant

    I’m thinking this piggybacks on the previous M2k infrastructure investments. Probably makes Rafale bid look cheaper in long term, too. IMHO doesn’t bode well for Eurofighter.

    Then again it may be the consolation prize.

    in reply to: The Report – The MOD's Missing Kit #2372780
    MadRat
    Participant

    Corporations are farming your government income streams.

    The IT issues are unforgiveable. They should be NATO standard propriety. OOPS, there is no NATO standard in IT.

    in reply to: F-111 retired early? #2373640
    MadRat
    Participant

    They were non pivoting and not wired with a communications bus.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 4,651 total)