dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,851 through 2,865 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • MadRat
    Participant

    You could get over the head on limitations of a swashplate if it was crescent shaped with the front of your nosecone mounting a separate array for near-boresight scans. Not sure why one would want a steered array when it pretty much forces you to stick to a non-optimal shape for your aircraft. If one wants a huge scan then the arrays ought to be along the fuselage focusing out to sides; side scan radars are great for survey work. Predatory fish have been using side scan, passive sonar for millions of years. With a good sense to your sides it allows for one to be successful finding prey in the darkness underwater with lesser eyesight.

    MadRat
    Participant

    There’s more than one way to skin a cat. F-111B was just ahead of it’s time, kind of like the YF-12A.

    MadRat
    Participant

    You’re adding a higher failure rate once you add mechanical steering. Just another system component to fail. The F-22 had the solution to the narrower FOV, cheek arrays. Nobody can find the money to complete it’s forward suite.

    in reply to: comparison of combat jet engines #2380738
    MadRat
    Participant

    Tornado with M88’s would have been more practical than an M53-powered Tornado. Two M88’s are more fuel efficient than a single M53.

    And we know the best engine ever installed on the F-14 was the F110-400.

    Some considerations:

    Honeywell F125-powered F-5E Tiger II
    Honeywell F125-powered Jaguar (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QISldH-zAP0)
    General Electric J85-powered Alpha Jet
    Turbo Union RB199-powered Northrop YF-17 or F-CK-1 Ching-kuo
    General Electric J79-powered EE Lightning
    Rolls-Royce RB.168 Mk 202-powered Mirage III
    Pratt & Whitney PW1120-powered Starfighter
    Pratt & Whitney PW1120-powered Phantom II
    Eurojet EJ200-powered Gripen
    Eurojet EJ200-powered Rafale
    General Electric F101-powered F-16XL or Mitsubishi F-2

    in reply to: Turrets for fighters #2380791
    MadRat
    Participant

    The merge would have to take place with far greater offsets if everyone has first shot first kill weapons. Computer aimed turrets and the true LOAL missiles offer a first shot first kill opportunity at wvr. Perhaps computer aimed weapons should be expected to play a defensive role in the future, too.

    in reply to: Joint Future Theater Lift Study — C-130 replacement #2382445
    MadRat
    Participant

    It’s that getting over a 50 foot obstacle in zero runway length that is impractical. Even the C-130 crammed with rockets couldn’t get off in that distance empty. The 1500 foot takeoff clearing a 50 foot obstacle is more reasonable, but still problematic. They seem to be steering this exercise in thought to a scaled up V-22 product. The Mil Mi-12 is the only helicopter to approach this requirement and we know how impractical that was to become. I’d say this zero takeoff run idea has zero chance to bear fruit.

    in reply to: Could the Argentine air force now Challenge the U.K.? #2382520
    MadRat
    Participant

    Let’s say there is a global cool down in the 2020 time frame. Cool down means less agricultural production in some countries already struggling to meet demand. You might just see somebody like China look at Argentina as a realistic trading partner, food for hardware.

    in reply to: Raytheon Tests New Small UAV Munition #1801031
    MadRat
    Participant

    But how effective is it I wonder. While 13 pounds is probably enough to clear out a bedroom, it’s probably not a good weapon out in the open. What would that end up being HE-wise, about a full pound of joy? I guessing its more or less for targeting individual rooms or vehicles.

    in reply to: UK SSBN Force a top priority #1801050
    MadRat
    Participant

    Yeah sure , like UK going to nuke argentina over Falklands :rolleyes:

    I was more talking about The Village Idi’s comment about SSN.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part III #2383252
    MadRat
    Participant

    How about cute little nicknames like the ‘Dog Soldiers‘ for the mobile forces and ‘Imperial Guard‘ for homeland security.

    in reply to: Could the Argentine air force now Challenge the U.K.? #2383291
    MadRat
    Participant

    I really cannot see Brazil supporting this kind of aggression. Definitely would thwart their current economic resurgence. But would be something Venezuela would participate in or at least support on a moral level. But in the end would hurt them, too.

    The Argies have motive, but lack the initiative and resolutions to make it all happen. And they would be easy prey for a two front counter offensive. They could not manage two wars.

    in reply to: Harrier – Your Thoughts? #2383299
    MadRat
    Participant

    It’s called slang.

    in reply to: Joint Future Theater Lift Study — C-130 replacement #2383302
    MadRat
    Participant

    Go for twice the width and a walkspace between. Flying wing with an H-tail and ramps front & back.

    in reply to: Could the Argentine air force now Challenge the U.K.? #2383426
    MadRat
    Participant

    A boost in the air force would not do enough. Argentina would also need a fleet of large hovercraft amphibians to make the journey fast enough and half way survivable when the submarines move in to interdict. And that is IF you can neutralize the flying elements guarding the islands.

    in reply to: Joint Future Theater Lift Study — C-130 replacement #2383584
    MadRat
    Participant

    If its a 35 tonnes requirement then that puts it safely in the Embraer C-390, Airbus A400M, and Kawasaki C-2 range. The C-130J is more in the 20 tonnes class.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,851 through 2,865 (of 4,651 total)