Why not? If there is a warehouse full of 20 years old, unused, properly stored parts, why not use them?
Because the airframes and their kit have a very tangible shelf life regardless if used or otherwise parked.
But IMO the second one has clearly a much taller tail than the others and (not 100% sure) it looks as if it has the larger rudder – see on the fin’s base – than a regular Flanker.
I think you are right. The clipped tails and nose resemble the early Su-33, of which China allegedly bought one from the Ukraine.

Notice the overall smaller profile when compared with pictures from Su-27 and Su-30 versions. I’m leaning to believe this is the Su-33 they allegedly bought. Is there actually three in the picture? Looking closer to the picture the next one behind looks like an Su-30, but the two after that look like they have clipped tails, too. If they were offshoots of the J-11 program that would be news.
The plane in the foreground looks like its tail is both shorter and nose droops down considerably more. Perhaps the one in the foreground is normal and its the many in the background which are the anomaly?
Was this a relatively cool or warm system? I’d imagine if its inlet air the friction should be heating up the tubes the air travels to a certain extent. Otherwise this is relatively ambient compressor air, right?
The government should be setting the rules for the mount for the communications, with the equipment fit per a competition for that aspect. This vendor specified role is b*******. It favors monolithic corporate bids rather than the market itself. This is how we got ourselves into corporate welfare, we let them write the rules for the bids.
IMO, the torpedoes from the helicopters and destroyers would have been just as effective as the ones from the SSN.
Good luck finding multinational partners on the next design if we fold up shop on this one so soon. They just need to kill the mission creep going on during the LRIP phase and get some airframes out as promised at a competitive price to what’s still on the production lines from the previous generation.
The F-15 is limited to subsonic flight through most of its flight regime. The reason it doesn’t supercruise is because its not meant to fly extended periods of time at the transonic and supersonic velocities. The leading edges of the wings and the canopy are but two limitations for sustained supersonic flight. This is why I don’t see the F-15SE being a big factor in sales against the F-35 for the future.
In the ancient days, combat radius included 10 minutes of maneuvering in the target area at 400-450 KIAS. This allowed for a circuitous approach to the target to increase survivability and enhance P kill, provides for repeated attacks (the airplane carries more than one weapon) and allows battle damage assessment of the target. I do not know if JSF has altered that definition to determine what they call combat radius.
You may be on to something. The ranges of the F-22 and F-35 likely include a ‘circuitous approach to the target’ and an extended X number of minutes maneuvering in the target area at 400+ KIAS. Keep in mind the F119 and F135 are incredible technology for converting fuel into energy, that X number of minutes maneuvering in the target area may be what artificially kills their range statistics. In a real engagement there probably is little incentive to maneuver for such long periods of time.
I bet a cold one that it will not be so heavily laden with control surfaces. China wouldn’t use canards and tail planes on J-XX, if its truly stealth, they would use TVC and minimal control surfaces. The fan art looks like a cross between Su-30mki and the J-10, only using twin engines. I am very doubtful it would become reality.
Too bad there isn’t a Squadron/Signal book on the MiG-19 clones by China alone. The clones have been around longer than the original now.
You’re not talking just 7 A-4’s. The land assets up to that point in time would have still been present. I imagine the air force units would have been massed and the exocets that were fired later would have been used at that time with far better trajectories.
Its unavoidable that the SSN’s would have had a turkey shoot. But without them the British fleet would have retreated deeper out into the ocean and played a layered defense to neutralize the land assets. This may have allowed the Argentinians to bolster the island against invasion and delayed the inevitable.
I did see buddy refeuling via a Vatour somewhere out there.
Just a couple things to consider-
A-The F-22 doesn’t supercruise at military power.
B-What’s the fuel consumption of both aircraft at M1.8?
Please clarify point A. I’ve never heard that claim.
Because they license production of the PW engine.