dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,226 through 3,240 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Taiwan's growing fighter gap with China #2397629
    MadRat
    Participant

    wilhelm-

    I’m all for a 12,000-pound class TF-1042. The USAF should be replacing the T-38’s with something in this class. It would make a brilliant engine for future light export fighters to sell to developing countries. The problem with American engineers and government types today is they have short-sighted goals. Everything has to be bigger and better. That works for about 20% of the developed world. Unfortunately, it doesn’t sell well to the other 80% of the world. The F-5 was an affordable option for a large swath of the developing market and something along those lines, only more modern, still has relevance today. Its not like American companies have been idle since Northrop developed the F-5, the problem is export orders depend on seeding from the American government whom is more interested in filling the niche by exporting used F-16’s.

    With the improved relationship between Taiwan and China an armed conflict is highly unlikely, as the economic ties are too strong already, Taiwanese firms employ so many workers on the mainland, that a war would be damaging to China as it would be to Taiwan. In the long run there will be peaceful re-unification just like Hong Kong. Selling arms to Taiwan is a provocation to China that serves no purpose. One should tell the Taiwanese that they should expect no support and advise them to start talking about the re-unification process of the breakaway island to the motherland.

    I think the natural evolution of China will implode itself much the same way the Soviet Empire imploded. One ruling class of one ruling ethnicity cannot maintain control over the rest forever. Eventually the main ethnic class of Chinese will fall apart under its own internal friction. Its the natural order of human development. Containing China to its own borders, not including Taiwan, is important to reach this end. Allowing China’s ruling ethnic group to continue to absorb more land will only delay the inevitable. Appeasement only leads to friction with its neighbors. Integrating Taiwan with the mainland will destabilize the peace that the region has been enjoying for thirty years. So soon people forget the lessons of the previous generations.

    in reply to: Rise of the Sea Gripen #2038150
    MadRat
    Participant

    I said published. They wouldn’t have been so public if it was for India alone.

    in reply to: CVA01 and CVV compared #2038151
    MadRat
    Participant

    Any pictures or links you could share?

    I’m thinking use gravity by making the rail ogee first downwards then back upwards. You wouldn’t want to have the aircraft launching at the same exact level as the flight deck or the rails would have to be further out from the side of the existing beam. But having five catapults available at any one time, with one of them specialized for launching heavy-laden aircraft – utility and AEW assets – would almost double the flexibility compared with the existing operations.

    Edit:
    The launch rail system used by the Germans on Graf Zeppelin:
    http://www.bobhenneman.info/flightsystem.JPG

    source: http://www.bobhenneman.info/grafzeppelin.htm

    in reply to: Rise of the Sea Gripen #2038164
    MadRat
    Participant

    It was published for Brazil’s consumption.

    in reply to: CVA01 and CVV compared #2038168
    MadRat
    Participant

    With all the brain power invested in these technologies I’m surprised nobody has came up with a ramped monorail launch that takes place off the main deck and places the planes on a climb at release. Granted you would want the plane to sit on a dolly that transverses the monorail. Once the plane is attached to the monorail’s dolly you could withdraw the landing gear and eliminate that much extra drag. All that deck space taken up for launching CTOL fighters seems wasteful.

    in reply to: Japan rolls out the CX and the PX #2398320
    MadRat
    Participant

    Anyone know if they plan a KC-2? The conversion to a tanker looks more than plausible.

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2398347
    MadRat
    Participant

    AESA are great for sigint. It is bandwidth limited in actively steering beams, but it has a huge capacity to passively absorb beams.

    in reply to: Anti runway weapons #1803987
    MadRat
    Participant

    The smart way to attack is with a missile that doesn’t expose the pilot. Any idea what missile does the job and it’s duty? As a kid I figured if you could burrow underneath the runway from the soft aprons that surround them you could do some serious uprooting. But then I figured to counter this you’d only need to lace the dirt liberally with pebbled rock. I’m not talking smaller aggregate, I’m talking pebbles like on the beach at Níce.

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #3, Cachorro-quente! #2398704
    MadRat
    Participant

    I enjoy your insights to this whole escapade, Hammer. Thanks for taking the time to bang them out on the keyboard.

    MadRat
    Participant

    What happened to the pilots?

    in reply to: Anti runway weapons #1804041
    MadRat
    Participant

    I’m surprised they didn’t use dispersed shaped charges timed to explode after they came to a stand still. Leaving a roughed up landing pad that requires a bunch of patches is worse than leaving a single crater.

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2399226
    MadRat
    Participant

    Fault the management mis-steps, like not completing structural test before starting flight tests.

    This was one of those ‘curiously timed’ decisions. This let the contractor off big time for its failure.

    in reply to: South Korea – ROKAF. Photo Achieve #2399228
    MadRat
    Participant

    Anyone aware of F-15K pictures with the Harpoon underwing?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part Deux #2399238
    MadRat
    Participant

    Doesn’t make sense if you ask me. If I make a landing gear strut and store it properly for 10 years, what could happen?

    Oxidation occurs in parts even in storage. Your wiring, seals, and other flexible parts will deteriorate over time. There is more to preservation of an airframe then parking it indoors.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2400913
    MadRat
    Participant

    The taller tail is the standard Su-27 family tail. The clipped tails AND long tail stinger are what make them interesting.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,226 through 3,240 (of 4,651 total)