dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,406 through 3,420 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Best naval fighter of the mid-1960s? #2433092
    MadRat
    Participant

    F-5 off a carrier? I’m not so sure its even feasible to get one to work with its high wing loading, low wings, and low thrust to combat weight ratio. Pilots would be skittish to fly them in that role.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2007780
    MadRat
    Participant

    Message to Georgia: “Its a commercially available ship. Get over it.”

    in reply to: Typhoon in strike role? #2389347
    MadRat
    Participant

    They have two-seaters too, right?

    in reply to: What do you think of the SAAB RBS 70? #1806252
    MadRat
    Participant

    Dear Member,

    Back in the 1980s I wrote one of the first articles on the RBS-70 in the US. Below is a link to page where I posted some of the photos and the over view manual of the RBS-70 which I think you will find of interest. Finally, Iran has the RBS-70 which they obtained during the Iran-Iraq War. It is one of the enduring mysteries of how they did.

    Jack E. Hammond

    http://www.armyrecognition.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=457&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=

    Very nice. Thanks for the link and information.

    Anyone know if the rbs 70 has actually been used in combat?

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2007804
    MadRat
    Participant

    I’d like to see some Yak-38s operate from these 😉

    Forget the Forgers, must be Freestyles or bust.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode 11.0 #2389584
    MadRat
    Participant

    What, no Platypus version?

    in reply to: Phantom Upgrades #2389588
    MadRat
    Participant

    Let’s combine the best elements of every upgrade and see what we could end up with…

    probe aerial refueling
    2x Pratt & Whitney PW1120 (two engines were on one ‘Kurnass 2000’ demonstrator in 1987) = TF30 equivalent thrust
    4x AIM-120B AMRAAM (German F-4F ICE)
    4x Python-3 (IAF) or IRIS-T (german test F-4)
    KS-127 LOROP (RF-4C long-range oblique photography)
    AN/APR-47 EW system (replaces internal cannon)
    F-4S wings (F-4J’s big wing with extra control surfaces)
    Twin-stick controls

    What else can people think of?

    in reply to: F-35 News and Discussion #2389637
    MadRat
    Participant

    IR homing missile launches are typically picked up by passive IR detectors. The problem isn’t knowing the missile is coming, the problem is that it’s coming. What to do… What to do….

    in reply to: New Hellenic Air Force Videos #2389664
    MadRat
    Participant

    So what would the Greeks like to add to the Mirage 2k-5?

    in reply to: USAF adds IRST pod for F-15C #2389785
    MadRat
    Participant

    OR… Our radar and defensive electronics have progressed faster than optics thereby negating the need for IRST.

    Now, with the advent of VLO fighters and the ROW catching up with radar tech and defensive electronics, we have decided that an advanced IRST would be a good addition to have.

    In all fairness its not like they were naked in this regard. Their optical search capabilities have always been a mystery to the public and it may or may not have been an irst of some form. Obviously they felt the need for some improvement, and they have chosen a very public way to promote it. Makes me wonder if there isn’t more to the upgrade.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -II #2007842
    MadRat
    Participant

    A technologically advanced warship? Its built in the civilian-side commercial yard.

    in reply to: Phantom Upgrades #2390144
    MadRat
    Participant

    So what is the ultimate version of the Phantom II?

    in reply to: Northrop-Loral F-19A Specter #2390147
    MadRat
    Participant

    Wow, a built in wedgetail radar for the spine…

    in reply to: Rafale M a possibility for RN if F-35 axed (Times article) #2007958
    MadRat
    Participant

    Did anyone stop to think that Sea Gripen publicity was a political balloon? Saab and BAe have been more or less collaborating for forty years. Maybe, just maybe, Sea Gripen is driven by the British need for affordable air wings. Sea Gripen is better than cancelling a flattop.

    in reply to: MiG-23MLA? #2391150
    MadRat
    Participant

    Don’t forget AL-31F re-engine proposal for the Indian MiG-23.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,406 through 3,420 (of 4,651 total)