dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,511 through 3,525 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • MadRat
    Participant

    I only saw one comparative. Where was the second?

    in reply to: Sea Gripen – MERGED #2417227
    MadRat
    Participant

    The UK might be smart to fill the empty spots on their deck with one just to fill in some of the excess capacity left from not buying all the F-35 airframes it set out to buy.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world -IV #2417236
    MadRat
    Participant

    The AL-55I engine is created for the Indian light training one- engine plane HJT-36 Intermediate Jet Trainer (owned by the HAL corporation) and the heavier two-engine HJT-39 Twin Engine Combat Attack Trainer.

    Are there any pictures available of an HJT-39 prototype yet? I found lots of the lighter HJT-36, none of the twin.

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2417577
    MadRat
    Participant

    Swerve, I figure by the way he called a couple of you out – like he’s known you before his so recent join date – he’s one of the people recently wiped from the ranks. It wouldn’t take anyone long reviewing your track record to see that you’re a straight shooter around here.

    Wouldn’t it be easier to build missile interface compatibility into each missile? Your bus will be hard limited on the aircraft until some sort of refit. However, a missile could be flexible enough to support a wide range of bus speeds for backwards compatibility. Because missiles change faster than aircraft the missile needs to be the one to submit. Scalp and Storm Shadow may share a common origin but I have a strong feeling the Scalp is non-compatible to other platforms by design, to keep it propriety with no possibility of conversion to Storm Shadow. It probably works vice versa.

    MadRat
    Participant

    Somebody please save this thread by posting new pictures. Funny how the ‘B’ model has just started flight testing and people are already crowning it a success.

    MadRat
    Participant

    this thread carries some of the CLUE game.

    Who? journalist Jack
    Where? in the simulation room ( or in Al-Dhafra )
    By whom? Colonel Nonsense
    With what weapon? The awful truth!

    lol

    in reply to: the F-35, does it make any sense? #2419552
    MadRat
    Participant

    The hilarity of journalism is 90% of “journalists” vote exclusively for leftist candidates, surround themselves with leftist friends, participate in leftist causes, have no contact with non-leftists, then they claim to be “impartial” when reporting their leftist world view.

    Myth. Journalists are by their very nature an extension of the right wing. Without stable control of the media in one form or another, no state would survive due to the constant attacks upon its foundations from liberals. A society is made up of pro-establisment members or it was never a society to begin with.

    Anyone that confuses liberalism with the politics of the left really shouldn’t speak so bluntly on the topic. Kids these days get their facts instantly from the wiki and then confuse left with liberal, whereas left is communist. The wiki isn’t always an accurate source of information.

    in reply to: Sweden to fund new 5th generation Gripen? #2419577
    MadRat
    Participant

    The tailfin would be different. I can see the premise of a sawtooth edge for all of the facets in the los. The diamond-shape of the cross-section looks plausible, too. Will they stick to this particular form or is this merely a broadly generalized representation?

    in reply to: Japan to consider F/A-22 to replace its F-4s #2419865
    MadRat
    Participant

    What powerplant is going to go into an indigenous F-22 equivalent for Japan? I don’t remember them having any homegrown options.

    I would guess if they do opt to build an F-22 equivalent then they will heavily lobby for access to the F119 and settle for the F135 if necessary. The stealth modeling is probably the single largest hangup for them to accomplish. How would they know if the effort they put forth isn’t a waste of time and money? It only took the U.S. about $350 billion to get stealth to where it is today.

    They’re probably better off to go for a modified F-35C optimized for air superiority and try to gain access to the F119 for its superior high altitude performance. With that combination they would be able to gain the high ground against any regional threats.

    in reply to: Why no low tech helicopters for Afganistan? #2420597
    MadRat
    Participant

    It takes 1,000 men to move 1 into an area of operations. Moving specific pieces of equipment takes pennies on the dollar. But the pennies add up when you have finite opportunities to move said equipment, it’s expendables, it’s spares, and it’s keepers.

    in reply to: Why no low tech helicopters for Afganistan? #2420945
    MadRat
    Participant

    Product liability laws in the states have made cheap aircraft untenable. They have to be nearly bulletproof or courts seem to throw huge judgments at them. During wartime the manufacturers are largely exempt from the same tort laws. If you would absolve manufacturers of some basic consequential usages of a war machine during peacetime it would substantially reduce the need for some of the complexity.

    btw – One $100K shot that gets the target is equally affordable to 100 shots of $1G ordnance to hit one target. Some complexities are very cost effective. Others are being wasted by the commanders out in the field. Look at the random firing of high cost ordnance in all the liveleak and youtube videos on the web. Much of the ordnance in Afghanistan seems to be wasted on boogieman targets.

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2423009
    MadRat
    Participant

    I’m not so sure Brazil could be any worse off using Rafale if Venezuela is using the Su-30. The latter is much more labor intensive. If Brazil is acting as the de facto parts supplier for their own planes then it shouldn’t be all that bad to maintain their own fleet let alone offer export options substantially cheaper than direct from the French.

    in reply to: End of the GR9 line #2423011
    MadRat
    Participant

    That is troubling. Your underwing capacity is going to drop off greatly before the arrival of the f-35b. 😛

    MadRat
    Participant

    quadbike is pointing out that this argument you are stuck on was covered previously at least twice if not more. Use the search function.

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2423614
    MadRat
    Participant

    I guess the more obvious question about the EJ200 is what does that engine bring to the table? In peacetime it may end up costing considerably more. In wartime it may be an advantage due to its ability to move more air. The tradeoffs must be leaning towards the rm12 camp or they would have made the jump by the C/D model.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,511 through 3,525 (of 4,651 total)