dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,886 through 3,900 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UK to retire Harrier force. #2469891
    MadRat
    Participant

    The civilians cry that the military costs too much to send to war then they **** & moan when it gets its ass handed too it because they underfunded it.

    in reply to: F-22 Already obsolete? #2470708
    MadRat
    Participant

    The real problem is the way the software is written for specific hardware. If they’d taken a more open approach where the hardware could innovate separate from the software, that is improve one without affecting so much the other, than they whole dilemma would be self resolved. This is a cultural problem within the design group more so than a simple technical issue.

    And in reality the processors used are not so obsolete in comparison to other systems still relevant to today’s military forces. It is just slow compared to what is off the shelf now. The whole system could be vastly improved with the current technology and a more granular battlefield awareness would be possible. Awareness after all is what one tends to lack in the event of catastrophe.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VI #2471242
    MadRat
    Participant

    Oh, please, we’ve all got the best one of those in the whole world. Let’s get back on topic. 😉

    in reply to: UK to retire Harrier force. #2471246
    MadRat
    Participant

    Stupid idea. If they try to sell them after that press release then they won’t get much of a return on the investment at this point. Seriously, the Harrier is beyond its turn in the spotlight. But to dump them before the next generation is ready seems completely absurd.

    The RAF head needs to resign.

    in reply to: first T-50 export customer? #2471844
    MadRat
    Participant

    Would the T-50’s be for training F-16 crews?

    It looks like Poland would be making a leap of sorts to have such modern designs.

    in reply to: The end of the LCA??? #2472241
    MadRat
    Participant

    India has this customary practice where people say “yes” to answers when the true answer is “no”. Its called lying in most circles, but its tolerable and customary for the people in India. Kind of like how time in many south American cultures is loosely interpreted when they say what time they will do something. Different strokes for different folks.

    in reply to: Rafale News V #2473003
    MadRat
    Participant

    Sean, sweet title! 🙂

    I wonder if your missile needs to power itself off the rail on a rear launch in order to not tumble. That could be dangerous as the buffering material that breaks free in the solid propellant would be striking you.

    And weren’t the french the first in theory to be able to launch a missile that actually strikes a target behind the launch aircraft without the rear firing method? Seems like the Israelis, though, were the first to put it into practice.

    in reply to: Brazil Reveals Russian Helicopter Purchases #2473032
    MadRat
    Participant

    Apache is still the best system the u.s. army has for removing immediate threats to army aviation on the battlefield. It can shoot from behind hills and destroy low altitude air defenses while hovering safely out of harm’s way. People around here read ranges on missiles and assume that means the missile can effectively engage targets at that range. The truth is Apache since the Longbow program is the only attack helicopter out there that can effectively deal with threats like Tor M#/Pantsir/Tungusta.

    in reply to: Rafale News V #2474127
    MadRat
    Participant

    Just like in Rafale 4, the alphanumeric enumeration of the number is an eye sore. Please rename the thread as Rafale News V!

    in reply to: Norwegian Government select JSF #2476561
    MadRat
    Participant

    Kind of makes you wonder if the sitting Norwegian government is even on the same playing field let alone with the same set of rules as their Swedish neighbors. 😛

    in reply to: Tornado Replacement #2476563
    MadRat
    Participant

    I wonder if the Tornado couldn’t be hardened and used temporarily on the new UK air craft carriers that are planned just in case the F-35 isn’t ready by then.

    in reply to: Tornado Replacement #2476933
    MadRat
    Participant

    The vg wings are more high-speed low-level flight friendly than the low aspect wings of the others.

    in reply to: Nimrod Sidewinder #2476934
    MadRat
    Participant

    Seems like you could put 4 stingers in an aerodynamic pod just as easy as putting the solo Sidewinder on there.

    in reply to: PMC’s As Air Police Contractors #2478467
    MadRat
    Participant

    Area 88?

    in reply to: How would you form the European Air Force? #2478632
    MadRat
    Participant

    If they ever did form an EU air force then just how much of the current forces need to be active and how much of it is superfluous? I would imagine a large component would still be immediately necessary for air policing, but how much of it should be converted into a reserve force? And would member states retain the executive decision making for their said contributions or would the EU air force become autonomous from the member states and solely an extension of the EU government?

Viewing 15 posts - 3,886 through 3,900 (of 4,651 total)