the guy who wrote the book iran-iraq war in the air 1980-1988 his name is cooper is pro-iranian airforce read the book and you will reach that conclusion i have written to him to point out that many of his claims are untrue..
thanks madrat
Thank you for the reply!! That is actually a book I own and have read on the matter. Thank you for the clarification on the Phoenix kills. Can you elaborate on any other mistruths in the book?
IRAF_PILOT-
Do you know of any launches by Iranian F-14 crews of their Phoenix missiles at Iraqi MiG-25’s? There is some debate among historians whether the Iranians truly had the activation codes to use them or not.
And if you don’t mind answering, what Iranian threat did you most fear when you were in the MiG-25RB? (The hawk sam’s, perhaps?)
None of this is relevant unless you know the scope limits of the E-3 and the MiG-31.
The AWACS has a larger spread of its modules and more modules overall for more granulation in its search. Its not even remotely comparable to a MiG-31. Add in the electrical power available to the E-3 and its on a whole different level. This thread has turned into around 50% posts just of star49’s opinion and its mind numbing to say the least.
Do you honestly think that the E-3 has relatively less power in its antenna than the MiG-31? The E-3 will see the MiG-31 at a longer range than the latter can see the E-3 it in any search mode. The whole premise of this MiG-31 can see the E-3 first conversation is just idiotic.
If Gripens work out then it will be a natural evolution for them to move to Super Hornets.
So pray tell us how it goes about the lofted trajectory to a doubled range of 600km and what tracking mode it uses between 7km and the terminal guidance mode? I’m very curious.
You have to remember than a lot of Soviet equipment is “export” models with crippling techniques than can be easily circumvented by several different foreign companies in the know. The Russians bide time before they offer upgrades to stuff that was crippled by adding in a component here and there into the system and removing some extra stuff that doesn’t belong. The idea of someone else offering an upgrade that essentially should have been handled by Russians has got to **** them off. They really should be more pissed that foreign companies know their equipment so well. And to unlock the full potential of this equipment for less than friendly neighbors is just plain asking for trouble I’m guessing. It feeds their political machine to rile up the population in support.
If you look at that last pic it is there, just hard to see against the sky.
I guess the Monroe Policy is dead.
OP, does JSTARS count as AWACS in your question?
Red Force will have to operate aircraft in range of the AWACS battle station, which isn’t something Blue Force is just going to allow to happen, hence the future standoff attack weapons across a whole spectrum of missions. The Blue Force will likely be using airfield suppression timed to strike on the egress of any threat so there is always the payback factor. If asat operations don’t blind the Blue Force then what good is hunting AWACS in the first place? The big picture can lose AWACS and not skip a beat if the other pieces are in place.
I was thinking more along the lines of intercepting bombers when I was talking about their weapons. But now that you mention it, the Lightning did enjoy a huge performance advantage when it came to control ability at its combat ceiling. If the F-4 and Lightning were pitted head to head I think the Lightning would take its chances fast & high against the Phantom. The Sparrow wasn’t a great weapon for use against a lofted target because it bled energy too fast to be useful in that respect.
I think the wing actually had an overall lower chord than F-15 complete with more surface area and displaced volume, therefore would have set it back in overall top speed. It wasn’t as beautiful as the swingwing but it would have been good for handling and great for maneuverability. The overall wing loading would not likely have been more but it would have been able to store more fuel in the wings. However, it also was designed around worse engines than were available at the time of SH development which would of played into the equation.
Weak weapons set? They carried more sensitive IR seekers in their missiles than the comparable sidewinders up until the 80’s. Pretty much the same reason F-106A planes beat F-4’s in simulated combat.
Give them a chance to buy Americanized Gripens instead. We don’t need a government that is not particularly trustworthy at this stage owning such an air force in such proximity to Israel.
How exactly would Gripens be less of a threat than F-16’s?
The swedes are trying to offload several dozen A & B versions. Give them an option for Americanized updates. These are much less of a long range threat to Isreal than F-16’s that have decent mileage left in them.
Avro Vulcan, EE Lightning, or Gloster Meteor come first to mind.