dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,276 through 4,290 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: North Vietnames Sukhoi Su-7 'Fitter's'?? #2507247
    MadRat
    Participant

    The North Vietnamese were so underhanded after the Vietnam war that they used the captured F-5C’s as their marquee homeland defense around the capital. That should tell you something about how ridiculously under equipped their forces were by that point. Remember, once the armistice was signed with the Americans the Chinese were licking their chops to move in and install a puppet regime.

    in reply to: Soviet Air Power #2507412
    MadRat
    Participant

    That’s assuming Mr. Shrubbery doesn’t suspend the Constitution and just call off the elections between now and November. He’s already declared war on the boogey man, survived a loss in a general election using the supreme nincompoops of the semi-round bench, assured the American people the economy is a resounding success in as late as a month ago, and used a signing statement to reveal himself omnipotent…

    in reply to: North Vietnames Sukhoi Su-7 'Fitter's'?? #2507415
    MadRat
    Participant

    And MiGs also attacked ships. That is why the U.S. was able to live fire their early ship-mounted SAM’s during the war.

    in reply to: Spy plan spotted #2508123
    MadRat
    Participant

    Like a ghost, its gone…

    in reply to: Your favourite what-if fighter #2508437
    MadRat
    Participant

    The Fairey Delta III looks interesting, actually it looks to have a similarity to the AVRO Arrow.

    Pity projects could of been merged.

    The Avro team originally commissioned the engine design from the Bristol Aero Engines “Olympus” team (same ones that would of provided the Delta III engines) but they couldn’t deliver. The Olympus wouldn’t see production in its after burning form until the Concorde flew, but by that time it was a joint venture of Rolls-Royce and Snecma.

    in reply to: Top 5 fighters as of today. #2508603
    MadRat
    Participant

    Not unless they were armed with modern weapons. (Assuming they’re being flown with equally skilled pilots so pilot skill isn’t a factor.)

    I wonder how many of the new weapons can climb up to 80,000 feet and hit supersonic targets like the Lightning, Blackbird, and Foxbat with anything but strictly a head on point of attack. Would seem like some problems never go away.

    in reply to: North Vietnames Sukhoi Su-7 'Fitter's'?? #2508900
    MadRat
    Participant

    Negative.

    in reply to: IRBIS and the detection of low RCS targets #2509024
    MadRat
    Participant

    I find very funny that the Sukhoi fanboys are ready to accept that the Su 35 has a signifcantly reduced RCS, such as 1m2 wahouh :-/, while denying this to the Eurocanards which were designed with features such as S shaped antenna from the onset.

    The larger plane is more likely to take on stealth characteristics simply due to the ability to carry so much more padding. But its painfully obvious that the Su-27 family is riddled with reflective surfaces. The use of stainless steel and aluminum on the exterior surface does little to hide its presence. Add in exposed riveting, right angled rudders, and stepped two-piece cockpit and your general design just screams “here I am”.

    in reply to: Your favourite what-if fighter #2509276
    MadRat
    Participant

    If Skyhawk is getting F404 in this fantasy, then so does the A-6 family! 😉

    in reply to: Rafale news II : we go on #2509497
    MadRat
    Participant

    Webmaster, please raise Arthuro’s and Scorpion’s personal picture posting limitations since they are such ace contributors around here!!

    in reply to: Soviet Air Power #2510090
    MadRat
    Participant

    There’s nothing shallow about electromagnetic destruction of your gadgetry nor of the mass death of your infantry and armored brigades through the use of enhanced radiation weapons.

    ‘Surviving forces’, it might just be worth noting, would have been far keener on abandoning their posts and spending a last few hours with their families rather than playing ‘whose plane looks cooler’ with the opposition over an uninhabitable Europe.

    Armageddon is just that – armageddon. Not a place for boys and their toys…

    You haven’t read too much on actual nuclear warfare and how limited it actually would be in eradicating an enemy. The effects of nuclear warfare were greatly exaggerated in the West to scare the masses into supporting the military machine. Sure it would sting the Russians to nuke them, but they would of survived well beyond multiple stages of nuclear bombardment. And their reasons for believing in survival were very sound.

    in reply to: Swiss F-5 tiger replacement #2510500
    MadRat
    Participant

    Would something like the T-50A Golden Eagle meet Swiss needs?

    http://www.jcs.mil.kr/upload/images/weapon/C0201/Image4-1.jpg

    in reply to: Your favourite what-if fighter #2511383
    MadRat
    Participant

    These two look interesting as what-ifs

    http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a94/WtMiller/2223.jpg
    http://prototypes.free.fr/vtol/nouv1/hawkerP.1216_02.jpg

    in reply to: what full load of F-16XL will be? #2512387
    MadRat
    Participant

    An XL with 35k lb engines and integrated IRST+TVC+1200 module AESA would be too much to ask I s’pose 😀

    You’d be approaching to close to JSF territory with that rig.

    in reply to: Soviet Air Power #2512638
    MadRat
    Participant

    Not much point in running sorties of any kind, offensive or defensive, through a radiation soup, with EMP knocking out most of your systems every few minutes…

    That ‘analysis’ deep enough for you?

    The Soviets were well rehearsed for nuclear wars to last 5-7 years and to not only survive but perform in massive maneuvers with their surviving air, land, and sea forces across the globe. So I’d say your analysis was vaguely shallow.

Viewing 15 posts - 4,276 through 4,290 (of 4,651 total)