dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,531 through 4,545 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Japan and the F-22 #2538355
    MadRat
    Participant

    Our long term force will rely more on the F135 model. Plus the F135 isn’t near the technology leak. That puts more such engines out in the wild to lose track of or have one fall into the wrong hands.

    in reply to: Japan and the F-22 #2538443
    MadRat
    Participant

    I’d rather see Japan get the F-35 or an F-22 with F-35 engines and cockpit with them paying for the fit out. They’d get much more than they would a stripped down F-22 and we’d get a better F-22 option for our own force. The F-22 could be better if it hadn’t been so strapped for cash in the program when it came to post-development revelations. Sure its the best now, but best is a relative term. Lets make it win-win for both parties.

    in reply to: Jas-39 crashed in North of Sweden #2539866
    MadRat
    Participant

    How does 3 crashes – statistically speaking only apply – over the course of the entire Gripen program compare to the globally distributed F-16’s and Mirage 2000’s.

    in reply to: UK F-155T requirement. #2542857
    MadRat
    Participant

    When I first read the thread title F-15 ST is what I somehow read. I was eager to see why the British would dump Typhoon and buy Boeing. I wonder how many other people did the same. 🙂

    in reply to: FC-1 Prototype 04: the Saga Continues #2543935
    MadRat
    Participant

    Yakovlev will probably offer them licensing for the jet reainer design they co-opted with Iran.

    in reply to: Request for North F/A-18L specification #2544140
    MadRat
    Participant

    Shave 7700 pounds off the Rhino and its probably worthwhile as an export fighter.

    in reply to: Super Etendard in air combat #2544459
    MadRat
    Participant

    With the pylons already overloaded underwing, a top-wing mounted aam for self-defense makes sense. I wonder why they never adapted Magic II for it in this case. Keep the mount out wide, above the wing tank pylong, and you could even use wva-heatseeking missiles.

    in reply to: No more F-22s? #2546940
    MadRat
    Participant

    From a logistical viewpoint the F-35 makes more sense. In the long run the F-22 is going to consume too many resources in comparison. IMHO the F-22 is necessary for complete air superiority. In war you do not want to play catchup, which is what would happen if you did not enjoy the advantages of first strike. The F-35 is not going to be that horse that garauntees air superiority.

    But like others have said, the bomb trucks do not have to be stealth and such expensive platforms.

    in reply to: ChinKuo vs SuperSeven #2546956
    MadRat
    Participant

    It seems, that both engines are fed by fixed inlets, that limits the top-speed to Mach 1,5 -1,8 at all.
    To compare both engines combinations, we have to look into the installed thrust.
    Both have an installed weight of around 1,2 tons.
    Both have a dry of 51-54 kN or 81-84 kN wet.
    Both have an airflow of 76-87 kg/sec
    Both fighters are ~6,5 tons empty equipped and >12 tons MTW.
    Both have an internal fuel of ~2,1 tons.
    Avionics aside both are very similar in performances.

    Hard to believe France wouldn’t just let them license build the M2000 for that kind of money. It’s almost as if outside forces cornered their designs, divided and conquered the two markets in order to retain a balance of power in the region. They are suspiciously identical in enough ways to guess its because neither country really had control of their own programs when it comes down to the nitty gritty.

    Now, FC-1 and F-CK-1 aside, I’d like to see how a true fighter-oriented T-50 or the production Tejas compares to them? All four of them should be nearly identical in just about all aspects. And to think the MAKO project will probably make them all obsolete.

    in reply to: New very nice mirage 2000 video! #2547414
    MadRat
    Participant

    Ah, Les Chevaliers du Ciel again, excellent footage as usual. Too bad you can’t save it on your HDD though, does anyone have a link for this video where that’s possible?

    Use hte DownloadHelper plugin with firefox and then go get the free flxplayer. Problem solved.

    in reply to: ChinKuo vs SuperSeven #2547422
    MadRat
    Participant

    I would be more worried about availability during war-time than raw power of the engine.

    in reply to: ChinKuo vs SuperSeven #2547641
    MadRat
    Participant

    Engine is the strongest point of FC-1. latest RD series are in class of EJ-200/F-414 with TWR of 9 in K and they already managed more than 10.
    from factory website.
    http://www.avia500.ru/ru/produce/motor/rd33/

    That would be using the term “class” liberally to describe the license version. Even the Russians hold something back in license deals when it comes to sensitive technologies like turbofans.

    in reply to: ChinKuo vs SuperSeven #2547733
    MadRat
    Participant

    F-CK-1 should have some advantages over the FC-1. The FC-1 is using a dated engine with export restrictions, meaning they’ll never have enough of them to sustain an indefinite campaign. The F-CK-1 is using a pair of engines that it can buy in quantity. I’m guessing the F-CK-1 is going to have a more meaningful flight suite, more flexible weapon choices to use in the a2g role, and has a radar/bvr missile combination advantage. From a design standpoint the F-CK-1 just looks quite sleek and powerful whereas the FC-1 looks rugged and heavy.

    in reply to: Self proclaimed experts bash the F-22 #2547741
    MadRat
    Participant

    I wouldn’t put it past someone to figure out a way to use them to guide missiles. China has basically done the exact same thing with the FT-2000.

    But by the nature of the way these things work you cannot triangulate within a meaningful locus. You’re picking up refractions of energy versus direct reflections of waves. You cannot even pinpiont a return in a meaningful way as to determine a doppler shift. So its never going to happen unless they up the energy level of the transmission beam to a level that will kill the target with massive radiation by default. Your power needs are going to eat away any advantage you’d gain with such a system.

    It also very plausible that the sr-71’s trailing exhaust plume was easy to detect even if the plane itself was not. People should look into the science before they mock the explanations.

    in reply to: Reactivating the FA2s…. #2549438
    MadRat
    Participant

    The Oriskany was offered to the UK. I doubt any other were.

Viewing 15 posts - 4,531 through 4,545 (of 4,651 total)