A little birdy tells me the IHI XF5-1 turbofan is very similar to an Adour, only redesigned with modern carbon-fiber blisk technology.
They had plenty of history with the Adours.
Thanks for the link, scar. Took me a few looks to tell that one picture was a MiG-29 under assembly. Very cool to see the innards
The only real significance of JF-17 is its relative inexpensive BVR capability. There is no ground breaking ground attack capability, nor relative high performance capability.
No doubt the four independent air arms and the rocket forces of the Soviets were the biggest threat. They just didn’t fight directly. I have zero doubt their willingness to fight.
Part of the issue was that each plane dipped down into the lobes of civilian radar and disabled their transponder making them virtually blend in with a whole different classification of air traffic. They lowered their airspeed and flew along natural geographical features to hide their intentions. It was rather predictable that the perpetrators were anything, but uneducated guess makers. Somebody went to great lengths to organize this and it definitely wasn’t some crazy religious nuts hiding in caves.
People continue to underestimate the sacrifices willing to be made – that the cultural motivation behind the attacks leads people to accept martyrdom as simple costs of furthering the cause – and will continue to make into the future. Nationalism didn’t spring to life in the twentieth century due to fear of economic systems, but rather due to lingering tension from centuries of resentment. People forget how the Great War began. The second was purely the first played out after a lull.
There is no magical defense or master plan to defend against this movement. It has festered for nearly 800 years with several violent clashes between cultures to push back. Amazingly the ones that push back are looked upon as villains. Funny how quickly and easily the common shy away from violence, even when it’s for survival. Organization of the common man can only be accomplished with ideology, something the West currently lacks. The people that carried out that diabolical plan did it in plain sight and nobody thought to intervene?
Without ideology how can one motivate the masses to thwart such plans in the future?
More likely a double digit manpads. The press just knows SA-7.
Note on IR and one AR in the configuration, suggests a ripple fire of both together in one volley.
Bomber destroyer design in 2016??
I wouldn’t want Qatar to fall into ISIS control well equipped with Saudi-compatible F-15E. Best make them choose incompatible engines to the Saudi order. The Rafale falling into ISIS control is far less of an issue, being they wouldn’t be self sufficient nor have a close neighbor with spares
Having two turbofans that are based off commercial products has to be a big maintenance plus compared to the Herc’
Fuel is the source of creating and reducing IR signature. The fuel uses hotspots to preheat, but the net gain is a reduction in heat in those locales. Bypass air through the outer two engine surfaces helps, too, but the fuel has much higher thermal capacity at high altitudes. The additional engine shrouds are a big improvement over previous designs, but the improvements in preheating are the key to low IR
I’m thinking more or less Vulcan B.1 bomber class than B-2A in MTOW, probably one bay versus B-2A’s pair.
The general consensus is that B-21 will piggy back off the B-2A program by using the engines and internal bay of the B-2A. I would suspect that it too will push the penetration role at around Mach .86 and operate above 50K feet. It will probably create – if F-35 hasn’t already – the de facto standards for subsonic release of smart weapons at standoff ranges. The F-22A will probably be the only superior stealth launch platform for said weapons, and only when operated at supercruise speeds.
Change of requirements from emphasis on range to loiter.
B-21 Chevronel (meaning small Chevron)