dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2159442
    MadRat
    Participant

    Their budget is better spent on cancelling usless programs like Mig-41 and PAK-DA and spend on more exportable programs like single engine LMFS.

    Russia never moved away from Socialism and their development process sees no need for pragmatism. It takes a bigger design team to build MiG-41 with fewer chiefs. The idea is to maximize the industry on fewer projects, not more. Create situations that groom too many chiefs it raises the chance for future challengers. Can’t breed success, they’ll replace you.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2159922
    MadRat
    Participant

    You could easily justify a single large engine trainer like T-50. Maybe it’s to keep the two-seat F-16 line open. We never know the politics here and the decision makers are always planning golden parachutes.

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2162460
    MadRat
    Participant

    B-52 as a tri-engine bomber – retired KC-10 engines and mounts find new perch…

    in reply to: Top Gun -The Movie Versus Reality #2162538
    MadRat
    Participant

    Top Gun 2 script is actually written now and production is in the early stages. It’s coming. And its going to center around drones. I’m guessing sort of ‘Deal of the Century’ scenario where drones turn on the inventors and the man-machine combination has to destroy it/them. Avoids painting any nation-states as bad guys. And avoids PC fault lines. Shame. I was hoping for a super villain flying either Su-37 Terminator or J-20 Stealth canard, backed by MiG-28M (Saegeh lookalikes) and the F-14A. I still hope its about the F-35C and not about F-35B or F/A-18E. There is still the outside chance they steal the title as best airborne flight shots from Sky Fighters aka Les chevaliers du Ciel.

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2162541
    MadRat
    Participant

    J-10 production slowed by Al-31’s being redirected toward J-20 program. Plenty of RD-93’s from the JF-17 program to use…

    http://defence.pk/attachments/19492877-jpg.180152/

    in reply to: Weapons systems air to air victories. #2162566
    MadRat
    Participant
    in reply to: F-5E Tiger II Vs. J-7G ACM #2163274
    MadRat
    Participant

    These threads comparing the miniature F-5 against the middleweight MiG-21 variations really shows you how good the Northrop design really was. The F-7 enjoys almost double the thrust and has much higher room for electronics, but due to such a hideous cockpit position and planform, the F-5 still contends. J-7G should be compared to F-CK-1, which isn’t too far out of an oversized F-5. The Gripen A isn’t much out of its weight, but you wouldn’t dare compare them….

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2169135
    MadRat
    Participant

    Looks very plausible. 🙂

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2171347
    MadRat
    Participant

    Is that a depth charge under an mpa?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2171354
    MadRat
    Participant

    Please translate or don’t post at all in non-English. Thank you.

    in reply to: How good is China's J8II Finback? #2171434
    MadRat
    Participant

    Yak-130 isn’t a super inexpensive end all. It suffered the same problems as their Italian counterparts, it’s too ambitious when much cheaper secondhand airframes in the same weight class are plentiful. It’s simply too expensive. It’s not exactly revolutionary. And it requires money to develop. Nobody wants to pay that bill.

    They should lease Gripen.

    in reply to: How good is China's J8II Finback? #2172521
    MadRat
    Participant

    Bangladeshis used to be responsible for filling manpower in UN missions that nobody else would commit bodies towards. They should aim for lighter air force that is western integrated. Are they in position to go with non-Russian upgrades to their MiG-29’s like the Polish and Germans? It would be interesting to see them go Gripen.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2176295
    MadRat
    Participant

    :highly_amused:

    I wonder if the Tu-22M3 could be used. It lacks range but the refuelling probe can be installed. It is available in numbers and it would certainly be cheaper than building all those Blackjacks.

    What about activating Tu-95? Are there any stored in good condition?

    Two problems. The Tu-22M doesn’t use a probe by treaty. And spare Tu-95 and Tu-142 airframes were chopped up by treaty.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2176663
    MadRat
    Participant

    It’s not worth running trainers as light attack. Typically trainers aren’t good airframes for the loads nor are the electronic avionics optimized for smaller airframes. You pretty much have to fly with few options that make your drops accurate. Nor can you loiter safely out of harm’s way. The AMX is about the smallest you can go and drop accurately on target out of MANPADS range.

    Edit: !@#$%& spellchecker

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2177500
    MadRat
    Participant

    It’s blue-green as opposed to green-blue. And swerve, unless you’re a chick there is zero chance you scored 100% on the color test. Only women – a tiny percentage – can see the fourth color. It’s a freak chance of nature to see that deep into the visible spectrum, but it’s limited to females.

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 4,651 total)