dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2216469
    MadRat
    Participant

    Plenty of either by itself, not together…

    in reply to: Best aircraft for the current mission against IS #2216520
    MadRat
    Participant

    Something with eight .50 Cal. machine guns (or 12 .30), inexpensive to build, rugged with a big R-2800 up front for power and protection.

    Big infrared target. Terrible situation awareness. Not any better off than flying a helicopter.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2216529
    MadRat
    Participant

    Dubious as in they just don’t seem to be out there. Please post them if you have them. They are not easy to find.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2217009
    MadRat
    Participant

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-hEGNJbrZ18s/UncJ8YTUGhI/AAAAAAAAD3I/XEwEENsPbNw/s1600/gripen+hornet.jpg

    So am I the only one that finds it dubious Rafale is never pictured with Gripen?

    The only one I’ve seen looks like CGI…

    http://aviationclub.s3.amazonaws.com/photos/2013/12/aabf4528c4488924.jpg

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2217012
    MadRat
    Participant

    Metal of all types has horrible fatigue ratings compared to wood. It surprises me that it’s not possible to infuse some kind of wood shock plate between sections to absorb the movements during intensive strains and oscillations. Wood tends to last through a thousand times the workout before failure. Perhaps there is too much heat inside the fuselage?

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2027174
    MadRat
    Participant

    Experts Question US Navy’s Decision To Swap Out DDG 1000’s Secondary Gun

    Strange no consideration for the NATO standard 35x228mm? Oerlikon’s naval version is designed to engage targets at 3500m. Denel’s version can engage surface targets at 6km or aerial targets at 4000m.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2217045
    MadRat
    Participant

    Its the housing for the leading edge actuators IMHO. The mechanism is much more rapidly maneuvered than traditional slats, now integrated into the dynamic flight control systems.

    in reply to: New AN-124 in Russia #2217077
    MadRat
    Participant

    If somebody was to do a civilian An-124 refurbishment in the US or Europe, why not use just two GE90-110’s?

    in reply to: New AN-124 in Russia #2217086
    MadRat
    Participant

    Taught = lesson
    Thought = conscious

    in reply to: Best aircraft for the current mission against IS #2217126
    MadRat
    Participant

    Turkey has bowed to pressure from NATO and the US to allow use of its airbases.

    The Apaches will have a short route to the fray. Expect IS to regroup and move south.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2217198
    MadRat
    Participant

    Funny, the USAF didn’t find fault in them any more than the Soviets did in their counterpart, the R-60. It was just a light missile, dude. It wasn’t a failure.

    The F-94 also carried a bajillion podded ffar.

    in reply to: Red Arrows – are Danish F-16s the replacement? #2217264
    MadRat
    Participant

    Gripen shows off British engineering. How cheap could they be leased?

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2217267
    MadRat
    Participant

    Semantics really. And F-101 was an escort fighter…

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2217285
    MadRat
    Participant

    Errrr.. no..

    F100
    inlet diameter – 880 mm
    max. diameter – 1,180 mm
    length – 4,900 mm
    weight – 1,700 kg

    Al-31F
    inlet diameter – 905 mm
    max. diameter – 1,280 mm
    length – 4,990 mm
    weight – 1,570 kg

    RD-33
    inlet diameter – 730 mm
    max. diameter – 1,000 mm
    length – 4,230 mm
    weight – 1,055 kg

    What is the life expectancy of the FC-1 airframe?

    Some info on the RD-93

    Length: 4,230 mm (166.54 in)
    Maximum diameter: 1,040 mm (40.94 in)
    Weight, Dry: 1,055 kg (2,326 lb)
    Complete power plant: 1,217 kg (2,683 lb)
    Specific Fuel Consumption
    Maximum augmented: 52.40 mg/Ns (1.85 lb/h/lb st)
    Maximum dry, S/L: 21.8 mg/Ns (0.77 lb/h/lb st)

    The problem is RD-33 and RD-93 has about a 200kg gearbox and starter package that isn’t included in the weight, but is needed for installation. The RD-33 also has 1040mm max diameter just like RD-93. It’s not a giant difference. The big advantage of the RD-33/93 is dry thrust SFC. Otherwise the engine is basically a pig with lipstick compared to engines in its size and weight. It’s not even cheap when you consider the maintenance unless your people work for relatively nothing.

    in reply to: comparison of combat jet engines #2217372
    MadRat
    Participant

    Except F135 SFC is actually 0.886lb/lbf.hr

    It’s been posted as low as .70 for its sfc. It’s still a secret.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,081 through 1,095 (of 4,651 total)