dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: comparison of combat jet engines #2217401
    MadRat
    Participant

    What modifications were made to the 2 Vulcans that took part in the black Buck raid in 1982, were there not engine upgrades?

    The engine upgrades were not specific for the war, but yes those Vulcans had the engine modifications.

    in reply to: Best aircraft for the current mission against IS #2217430
    MadRat
    Participant
    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2217553
    MadRat
    Participant

    Both RD-33 and RD-93 are the approximate size of F100, so it’s reasonable to assume it should be higher than 9 tonnes. MiG-29 is pretty much a pocket Flanker. The Al-31’s are way too long for MiG-29, but RD-33 is much shorter in length. F100 would probably fit fine. But what is the point of an engine that outlasts the airframe?

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2218180
    MadRat
    Participant

    So,even less range and worst agility for the JSF…no RCS advantage…no reason to buy it…

    Or the vast majority of F-35’s life the RCS advantage isn’t necessary. It’s relevant then it’s there. It’s unnecessary then load up the wings.

    in reply to: Best aircraft for the current mission against IS #2218186
    MadRat
    Participant

    Perhaps NATO could base its forces in Turkey, that would be more secure that putting them in Iraq.

    Don’t expect the Turks to help, even though it’s in their backyard. The Turks have been the middleman here. The sad ideology here is that the IS movement is the rebirth of the Ottoman empire that hasn’t been much of a factor for decades.

    in reply to: Best aircraft for the current mission against IS #2218192
    MadRat
    Participant

    So true :p
    But we still have no word on what happened…i douth the F-15 was close to the ground…
    When an aircraft like the F-15 is hit these are my usual suspects…
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_mm_air_defense_gun_KS-19
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/85_mm_air_defense_gun_M1939_(52-K)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/85_mm_air_defense_gun_M1939_(52-K)

    More like ZU, ZPU, and ZSU…

    in reply to: Best aircraft for the current mission against IS #2218829
    MadRat
    Participant

    Part of the problem is the IS guys were from within the Iraqi military and they now drive equipment once owned by the Iraqis. You’ll be surprised at what helicopters they now own…

    in reply to: Fighter availability by type and nation #2218920
    MadRat
    Participant

    I really find it irresponsible for NATO allies to have been so hawkish on both their own Eurofighter and Rafale programs when real cooperation would have made a single airframe possible. Not only that, but Gripen could have been the counterpart in a HI-LO developmental process. They’ve really gained nothing but stagnation of their programs. Wouldn’t license built F404’s by Snecma and Rolls-Royce been just as good as indigenous engines?

    An extension of the same hard headed mentality is IRIS-T, AIM-132, AIM-9X, and MICA IR all populating the same WVR niche. They all could have been using common ideas like how the French used IR missiles to complement the integrated search sensors. It didn’t help that the U.S. was being just as finicky. All men for themselves attitude. Then we’ve got competing AGM’s, ASM’s, anti-ship missiles, etc. Just a bunch of wasted effort by ‘allies’.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2218962
    MadRat
    Participant

    You may have missed the term “South Asia”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Asia

    Your welcome

    The Allied forces in Afghanistan operate more advanced aircraft than an F-16 Blk52….

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2219221
    MadRat
    Participant

    And there were statements FC-20 would be in the PAF. It hasn’t happened. Times change.

    in reply to: Best aircraft for the current mission against IS #2219222
    MadRat
    Participant

    It’s one thing to drop ordnance, but if you’re hunting targets of opportunity then you need the sensor slant range of the U-2, the firepower of the AC-130U, and the precision of a laser. Computerized aiming systems for 105’s will put shells on individual targets the vast majority of the time. The UK long ago developed a Merlin mortar submunitions that can hit illuminated targets. There are laser guided ffar-type rockets just now reaching initial production. The B-1B can already drop 80 gps-guided bombs on a single mission.

    There isn’t much need to get into firing range of the groundfire except to locate the enemy. No sense decoy targets couldn’t do that.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2219228
    MadRat
    Participant

    There is no indication J-31 will fly in the PAF.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2219359
    MadRat
    Participant

    Isn’t it a static rotor face? Doesn’t need to spin…

    in reply to: Bill Sweetman reminisces… #2219365
    MadRat
    Participant

    If they had avoided the underside intakes I’d been more excited for MiG 1.4x, but it looked too much like a Eurofighter. Maybe if it was more like a Rafale with the intakes.

    And we never found out if it would use internal bays.

    The back end looked uninspired, too. That’s where Su-47 Berkut really blew it away, with its wedge-like trailing edge. Sukhoi engineers clearly had the better aesthetics.

    in reply to: MiG-21 Lancer #2219375
    MadRat
    Participant

    Yakovlev built trainers and airliners.

    The former Warsaw Pact members had the same issues until the currency stabilized. Even then there was no pool of parts to draw from. MiG was collapsing before the rest of the country.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 4,651 total)