Who cares if they paint them camo or black? As long as they don’t develop T-50 features into the Su-34 like the levcon’s, the new intakes, EODAS equivalent, and all moving rudders.
The MiG-23 was not in substantial numbers to make it so much front line as a gap filler.
Let’s face it, if you flew MiG-23’s the only type you wanted was equipped with R35 and not either AL21 or R29.
You are full of crap when it comes to F-35. The aircraft is currently a leap above the last generation. Gripen is a low cost solution, but it has nowhere near the F-35 program’s capability.
Right now the vote is framed as fighter jets or social spending. The Swiss public like other western countries is drunk on freebies.
It would have been harder to justify MiG-29 than MiG-23. Let’s face it, MiG-21 satisfied the role in a limited engagement environment. You needed bigger hardware beyond that. The export MiG-23 with MiG-21 radars and fire control were simply expensive MiG-21’s. The MiG-23 airframe gave you a viable multirole fighter except for the fact it came about when all the fighter resources were transferred to MiG-29 and Su-27. It never had a realistic chance to become more than specialist role players.
There was never a doubt that an invasion by land would have touched off a tactical nuclear exchange at a minimum. The truth is all the simulations gave the Russians optimal logistics and NATO the perfect storm of failure. The truth is even the Russians gave a window of opportunity to win such a war in years not months, and at the expense of their own civilization as they knew it. As the picture began to get more granular then factors like pandemics would have settled in to where the window turned to decades. Not to mention their plan involved frequent truces and buildups to renew the fight. There will never be another Mongol invasion or the like of Europe ever again. History has shown that mother nature has built in factors that will make one world one party never happen.
I have no doubt that MiG-23 would be a viable fighter today if it had resources put into it. The root pylons should have been canted like on the F-14 to hold either two r77 or a drop tank and one r77. The chines should be capable of an r77 on each side or y-mounts for a total of four r73. The nose was plenty big for a decent multi-role radar, although its more power-restricted than size restricted. Modern materials and swivel mounts like on the Tornado would have given great swing role options. It could have used a more modern intake design, but the one it had wasn’t exactly a failure. If it had been a little sexier, say with underbody scoops and an LERX, it would have been probably too prone to fan ingestion.
USN penalized for acting frugal. Doh!
All drones are expendable by nature.
M88 would make just as much sense as rb199. Neither is particularly cost-effective for a drone that is expendable. Makes more sense to stick with cheaper and less sophisticated engines. Like has been said, it is an international engine, making the Adour choice more export friendly.
The range of the missiles already offset no drop tanks. This is a further bump.
I can only imagine the technology should easily scale down to MALD targets in the SEAD mission.
Does JMSDF have any bold new plans to rapidly move troops around the Yellow Sea to counter Chinese future-potential threats?
a UK P-8 would not be a bad idea,
i built a model some tima ago as to how the P-8 would look like in RAF service (Neptune MRA.1)
Nothing against your model, it’s just tha P-8 looks ugly in British colours. Nor are there enough antenna for something In RAF service. Your probe looks good. But there is just something wrong with it still because it’s too plain for the UK. It really would look more British by design with a T-tail and wingtanks from the Valiant and maybe a Nimrod’s nose…. 🙂
The problem is that P&W is locked into a design, unable to improve the engine unless authorized to do so. If one was to revive F136 then you would need P&W to open up a competition to improve their own engine or you’re not improving anything, just politics substituting sole sourcing.