dark light

Meddle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,516 through 1,530 (of 1,933 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WHAT Made You ANGRY Today? #1832054
    Meddle
    Participant

    Why?You seem surprised! Perhaps it is not endemic where you live….ah these responsible, honest Scots!:eek:

    Not surprised, but fifty yards is a surprisingly specific distance. I wonder if John Green measured a fifty yard radius personally. :highly_amused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #274019
    Meddle
    Participant

    Abuse of the system is endemic. I know. The evidence is within fifty yards of where I live.

    Do tell!

    in reply to: WHAT Made You ANGRY Today? #1832064
    Meddle
    Participant

    Abuse of the system is endemic. I know. The evidence is within fifty yards of where I live.

    Do tell!

    in reply to: Lets bring McDonnell Douglas back! Do you agree? #864430
    Meddle
    Participant

    I want one yes…but money doesn’t grow on trees these days unfortunately.

    I’m not sure it ever did.

    However you could try and get to Lelystad to see their DC-8?

    in reply to: More Rumours of Buried Aircraft #864443
    Meddle
    Participant

    This entire matter is just a fantasy, a delusional fantasy.

    I’ve had my tongue planted firmly in my cheek the whole time. I thought ‘Next stop; crated Whirlwinds’ would do the job!

    in reply to: General Discussion #274130
    Meddle
    Participant

    Is that really the Defcon website?!? It looks like a Geocities page from the late ’90s.

    Otherwise, a long, tedious video from one of Youtube’s least charismatic conspiracy theorists. Utter bull**** from top to bottom.

    in reply to: Four US Aircraft shot down & WW3 averted. ? #1832080
    Meddle
    Participant

    Is that really the Defcon website?!? It looks like a Geocities page from the late ’90s.

    Otherwise, a long, tedious video from one of Youtube’s least charismatic conspiracy theorists. Utter bull**** from top to bottom.

    in reply to: More Rumours of Buried Aircraft #865046
    Meddle
    Participant

    Hi Robert

    So.. did the locals give any indication as to where the hole was? Without wishing to lead any witnesses, the only candidate in 46 for activity / disturbed ground is here:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]236397[/ATTACH]

    I would place those disturbances at roughly 55.935156, -2.771601. There are some darker marks in the field there, but the geometry of the fields has changed a lot since 1946. It might be best to check along the Western field margin. These are accessible under the Outdoor Access Code (I think) and may also prove to be where a lot of ploughed off material may end up.

    Next stop, crated Whirlwinds.

    in reply to: More Rumours of Buried Aircraft #865390
    Meddle
    Participant

    Just for reference, are you talking about the section being ploughed up in the photo in the first post? All of the land there looks newly turned. Perhaps the farmer would be forthcoming.

    in reply to: More Rumours of Buried Aircraft #865404
    Meddle
    Participant

    I’m game for some digging.

    in reply to: Shackleton WL795 #865539
    Meddle
    Participant

    David, I was not meaning the number of air museums and perhaps by mentioning the recent published guide I have not helped my case. I believe that there are more aircraft preserved in public and private hands now than 40 years ago in the Uk.

    It probably helps that a fair number of aircraft have become ‘historic’ in the last 40 years. Considering the historic airframes outside East Fortune, a Vulcan, a Comet and a BAC 1-11, none of these would have had any place in a museum in the ’70s, right? Shackletons are a good case in point too.

    in reply to: Some Wings To I.D. #867798
    Meddle
    Participant

    I’m not convinced Fan trainer wheels go into the fuselage;

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2e/Rhein-Flugzeugbau_Fantrainer_600,_Private_JP6233226.jpg

    The red and white paint scheme suggests that the wing came off of a trainer. RTAF appear to have used Cessna T-37s as well, but the undercarriage assembly doesn’t allow for it to pack into that nifty little hole in the wing you posted in picture #2 above. Chipmunks appear to have a fixed undercarriage, so they didn’t come off one of those either.

    The wing maybe even came off of this example;

    http://www.abpic.co.uk/images/images/1419545M.jpg

    in reply to: Classic Flight Announce Newquay Closure #867800
    Meddle
    Participant

    I’m adding my thoughts to the comments above about creating some sort of ubermuseum in the Midlands.

    in reply to: Classic Flight Announce Newquay Closure #867808
    Meddle
    Participant

    What happened to nostalgair1? Lost at sea?

    If I was involved in the Midland Air Museum I would be slightly troubled by all these punters wishing to lump an aircraft collection on my doorstep. Isn’t that outfit already run by volunteers? If all was good then they wouldn’t have a boneyard next to the museum with half-complete airframes and other materials sitting in the weeds. I think the addition of several more large airframes would be bad news for them; how many spare weekends would be needed to paint a VC-10? Is a BAC 1-11 that worthy of inclusion? Its a dumpy wee airliner from the sixties, and the Newquay example is hardly the last of its type.

    in reply to: Shackleton WL795 #867976
    Meddle
    Participant

    Great news to read. They seem to have their online presence sorted out, which is good to see.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,516 through 1,530 (of 1,933 total)