This thread is pretty stale. “Interesting News Snippets” is entirely misleading; “Boring, badly researched, and variously glib or fear mongering articles from the Daily Mail about immigration, ISIS or climate change” would be more accurate.
Speaking of the Daily Mail, I see that the top story at the moment is about Bangladeshi children making 20 pence a day sewing up jeans. The cynic in me wonders what they would be earning if they weren’t sewing up jeans? Possibly distasteful, but I doubt many children in Bangladesh have the luxury of an indulgent and care-free childhood. If they weren’t sewing jeans, what would they be doing?
Who needs the EU to do that?

Plus the two that Setter reported…..
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?31334-Black-widow-went-to-Europe
What is that thread all about? Does it reference an earlier thread?
Then there is KB976 … 🙁
Isn’t KB976 spread across three continents with the good stuff lurking in shipping containers somewhere in Kermit Weeks’ deep storage? I would be heartily surprised if it ever flew again. Isn’t the Weeks material (for want of a better word) a combination of KB976 and another Lanc anyway? I can imagine the thorny issue of what happens to all of Weeks’ unfinished projects will come to the fore in the next couple of decades. As easy as it is to champion somebody stockpiling all of these aircraft, he doesn’t have the time to save them all, and a Limey bomber in thrashed condition isn’t going to be top of the heap.
Because unlike some, I don’t wear blinkers.
Funniest thing I’ve read this week. :highly_amused:
Because unlike some, I don’t wear blinkers.
Funniest thing I’ve read this week. :highly_amused:
An odd occurrence, especially if the blue paint was used in a previous incident. It doesn’t seem like a completely random attack, though the blue squiggles mean nothing to me. Does that shade of blue carry any significance in Australia?
An odd occurrence, especially if the blue paint was used in a previous incident. It doesn’t seem like a completely random attack, though the blue squiggles mean nothing to me. Does that shade of blue carry any significance in Australia?
So there could be five fliers in a few years… :rolleyes:
Perhaps that answers the question of what will replace the Vulcan. Five Lancs in formation with the Shackleton. :very_drunk: Place your bets now…
I dare say that restoring a Lancaster, that has spent 51 years outdoors, to flight is perhaps the dictionary definition of uphill struggle. The same applies to the example in the WIX thread. Wasn’t that one at imminent risk of ending up in the skip?
You are assuming that casual visitors only go there to learn about the RAF.
I was at Hendon last week; a pilgrimage of sorts. Most excitingly, a gas cylinder exploded on the roof of the construction site opposite whilst I was there. I felt the shockwave in my chest, though the sound wasn’t actually that loud. I thought it was part of the soundtrack until I stepped outside and saw the police cordon and fire engines.
As a museum I was impressed and apathetic in equal measure. For one thing it was very enjoyable to see so many types in the flesh. The Bomber hall was overwhelming however. In other circumstances a Lancaster, Vulcan or Liberator would be the focal point of an indoor static display, but when you cram them all into one space a sort of fatigue set in. The lighting didn’t help really, being an odd mix of bright-yet-directional lights and gloomy murk. I’m not sure if this is a conservation tactic or simply the result of various half-baked upgrades to the lighting? I’ve been to other museums with low lighting, but none where a Vulcan bomber can be reduced to a virtual silhouette. Impressive that they fitted it in, but other than getting to walk under the nose the thing is virtually nothing more than a canopy blocking out even more light.
I visited a few museums in London, and overall Hendon was the one with the least impressive interpretation or sense purpose. The Battle of Britain hall was better, and the milestones section was also interesting If a little scatty, but the bomber hall and the bit next to it didn’t work. I personally think they could make much better use of he collection they have, or possibly cull it down. You are presented with either a Top Trumps list of aircraft attributes, endless walls of text or a thinly veiled ‘Tally Ho, we smashed the Huns!’ narrative. You could argue that it is hard to tell the story of aviation concisely, but the British Museum do a better job with several millennia’s worth of disparate artefacts. Perhaps a better solution would be to talk about the specific aircraft themselves? To what degree have they been rebuilt, restored or replaced? Some aircraft had this, but not all. Another idea would be to break the fourth wall and talk about what actually goes into restoring an aircraft, and what the museum have to do to keep them in their current state? Perhaps even discuss the history of aircraft preservation in the UK? The Natural History Museum do this, because they realise that rooms full of stuffed animals aren’t sufficient. Hendon, in the main, provides a museum for the anally retentive rivet-counters who just want to see ‘one of everything’.
Britmodeller doesn’t seem so kindly disposed to this poster
I think I like him more already!
But, for much of the content on this forum, especially since most of it took place before most of us were born and was invariably taken by official photographers working for the military/government anyway, aren’t we all content thieves?
The idea of using ‘stolen’ images seems to only be an issue on this forum, or so I’ve noticed.
It does look pretty rusty. By comparison I saw the French frigate Aquitaine in Leith port a few weeks back. It makes HMS Tyne look like a trawler!

It does look pretty rusty. By comparison I saw the French frigate Aquitaine in Leith port a few weeks back. It makes HMS Tyne look like a trawler!
