dark light

Lt Anderson

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 242 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian offensive in Ukraine #2228692
    Lt Anderson
    Participant
    in reply to: Best Russian heavy weight fighter #2228731
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    Go on. 🙂

    in reply to: Russian offensive in Ukraine #2228741
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    So do the volunteers from around Europe bring their own air defence systems to battle the Ukrainians or are they being lent any by Russia?

    Air defence systems like Buk, Strela, Igla MANPADS, are mainly provided by a nearest place : ukrainian army.

    in reply to: Russian offensive in Ukraine #2228745
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    There were no hordes of tanks aircraft and troops when Russia the Crimea a few months ago, quite the opposite in fact – but Crimea is now a territory of the Russian Federation.

    Crimea was independant between 1991-1993 (1992?).
    It was only a gift (once again) offer to Ukraine to calm down west countries and US(OTAN) because a new Russian Federation ruling totaly Crimea and her strategic military bases and ports looked like a big menace against the west.

    in reply to: Russian offensive in Ukraine #2228765
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    Let’s be clear : there is no russian military invasion against Ukraine. That’s the main point.

    But obviously there are :
    – lot of volonteers from Russia (how suprising, russians people helping russian cultural people, we never seen that pefore in an other country),
    – lot of volonteers from Spain,
    – lot of volonteers from Germany,
    – a frist bath of volonteers from France,
    – volonteers from Czech Republic,
    – volonteers fron Slovakia,
    – …
    Is it an international war against Ukraine and her “age-old chivalrous nature” army?
    (http://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/30643.html)

    What I said is facts, “Russian Invasion of Ukraine” is propaganda. Propaganda because you don’t have any objective element to show.

    in reply to: Russian offensive in Ukraine #2228887
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    Sanem… Please… Don’t…

    Not here…

    “U.S. officials”…
    Next time it will be Lysenko of the ukrainian MoD?

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2230037
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    I would imagine that Swerve was refering to Grozny in 2000.

    The leveling of Grozny was done in 1996 and made by Eltsin (Yeltsin).

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2230062
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    It’s terrible when Ukrainian soldiers shell towns, & civilians flee to escape the fighting.

    It’s entirely justifiable when Russian soldiers shell towns, & assist in the forcible expulsion of a couple of hundred thousand people.

    Or so some posters here seem to believe.

    When did russians bomd ukrainian cities?

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2230323
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    “Global Research News” is a loony site. It’s well-known for it. It repeats lies, tells its own lies, & never questions anything which agrees with its agenda, which is anti-west, anti-Israeli, anti-capitalist, anti-vaccination, conspiracist – & because Russia is anti-western, pro-Russian.

    Nobody who uses it as a source can be taken seriously.

    Here’s a better one : https://twitter.com/StateOfUkraine

    in reply to: TSR-2, Where Would it be Now?… #2230363
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    How the RAF almost acquired Mirage IVs: An insider’s story
    http://hushkit.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/how-the-raf-almost-acquired-mirage-ivs/

    A fascinating episode that is rarely discussed is how close Britain’s RAF got to adopting Mirage IVs. This insider’s account of this unusual episode in aviation’s annals is taken from Charles Gardner’s ‘British Aircraft Corporation – A History’. This true story starts shortly after the shock-cancellation of the BAC TSR.2…

    …The idea was to get the government to take jointly made Mirage IV airframes fitted with Spay engines instead of buying the F-111. This, BAC argued, could provide a highly efficient TSR.2 replacement aircraft, fully capable of performing the TSR.2 tasks, at a total cost, for seventy-five aircraft of under £2 million each.

    Mirage IV flight tests as a bomber (8x 1,000lb bombs) for the RAF requirement (1965)

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-XExfKtRf3rU/UZz_1evdWRI/AAAAAAAACIA/BlUTVifzpFY/s1600/mir4a_a.jpg

    Other view
    http://www.mirage4p.com/slides/Historique/histo7.jpg

    A

    MA

    ZING

    !!!! :eek::eek:

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2230957
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    Try this blog

    http://bharatkalyan1.rssing.com/chan-6237423/all_p146.html

    Mmmmh, I found nothing.
    I’m looking for something of that kind :
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231168[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2231586
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    In an other forum I had a discussion about the Buk-M and mostly the TELAR, but I don’t have any cutaways and I’ve been inable to find some in google-image.
    Does anyeone here have this gem?

    in reply to: New bomber for Russian Air Force #2231593
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231137[/ATTACH]

    Nice.

    If only…

    in reply to: Can anyone help ID this bondome? #2235814
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    Sud-Aviation SA-316 Alouette III.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]230811[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]230812[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2241981
    Lt Anderson
    Participant

    Please guys don’t turn this thread to an average militaryphotos.net topic.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 242 total)