I am sure the engine is a transport Centaurus, at least 10 years ago I remember having a good close look at it, then it was in fine condition, just like it was out of the crate following overhaul. Pity its sat outside since.
Is their much commonality with Sea Fury Engines.
Richard
I want to add the C-130 Hercules to the list, surely an aircraft that has been in production since 1954 has become a milestone.
TANGO CHARLIE
I wish you all the best with the rebuild, just a question regarding the glued joints, do they all have to be remade with modern glue or just critical ones. Joints that look OK can they be left alone. I know a fair bit about tin aeroplanes but have no knowledge about those made from God’s composite.
Richard
All that work, and cost, must be really dispairing to those involved.
Bf109’s and Ha1112’s have a poor history as historic/preserved aircraft, were they that bad when they were in use with their first owners, and why didnt they do something about it.
Richard
CAMLOBE
I dont doubt that the Lancaster swing was due at least in part to incorrect tyre pressure but a wheel/tyre assembly leaving a workshop is only inflated to a nominal pressure, the final setting of the pressure is down the the man when he fits the wheel and then signs for it.
That wheel may have sat around in store for a while, or been fitted to another aircraft(not likely in this case I know) operating at a different weight and needing a different pressure.
Richard
An individual aircraft can lose its ETOPS certification for a number of reasons, a component change for example, with some systems being considered more critical than others, fuel indication for example. The first half hour of a flight can sometimes be used to revalidate the rating ie if it works OK during that time its considered fixed, if it doesnt you turn round.
Another reason may be a defect that is being carried until decent downtime allows it to be fixed, say for tank entry, this could limit its ETOPS ability or nulify it completely.
An operator may choose some aircraft to be none ETOPS within the fleet for cost reasons.
Richard
Only a guess but could it be some sort of rigging aid, perhaps fitting onto something solid like a fuselage longeron when an airframe was being assembled or repaired, trued up. Or alternatively an adaptor used when setting up fixed gun mounting.
Looks too weak as a gun mount itself but almost to well built for a rigging tool. Baffled.
Richard
I doubt they are any form of balance weights as they appear to be attached on to an area of the structure that is only fabric. I any case you would not fit weights to the fin.
I would guess they are Identification labels, possibly fabric or paper with the usual data on them such as Manufacturer, Drawing number, Part Number, Mod State. Might be attached with thread through to the other side of the component, then easily removed by cutting the thread. But that would loose all the information they contain!
Would be interesting to see if they only appear on newly assembled aircraft.
Cant think it was anything to do with bonding for lightening protection or their influence on the compass being they are steel framed.
Richard
The Optica is my choice, never thought it worth all the effort when a Piper Cub could do virtually all the same work.
Richard
Can’t be right.
Where’s the dog?
Moggy
WAAF’s got it under her arm.
I remember the Chipmunk in the back of the canvas hangar at Waltham, I went there as an ATC cadet several times during 1966/7 and on one visit I liberated a small section of fuselage skinning from that a/c, it has part of the roundal blue/white paint on it. So looks like I am part responsible for the hole seen in the picture. Still have that bit of skin it in the garage. Only seems like yesterday but its over forty years ago.
Thanks for the memory jogger chaps.
Richard
I think the replica Spitfire is now with the Southampton Solent Sky Museum as a travelling displey item.http://www.spitfireonline.co.uk/
It certainly has wings that can be removed outboard of the undercarriage, a mod that I thought was done to facilitate easy moves by the museum.
Pity it has ended up grounded(despite what Solent Sky Says) as with a bit more effort it could have been a reliable flyer.
Richard
This very picture is published in the Profile Publication 182 on the Heyford.
The caption is ‘ A HEYFORD 111 (probably K5184) TOWING AN EARLY HOTSPUR GLIDER OVER CAMBERLEY, SURREY, JANUARY 1941.’
Richard
The last in service were the T5 bombing trainers and these were retired in 1977.
The lack of any civilian type certification would have really prevented any potential sales post RAF use, especially for an aircraft that had no special capability such as nose loading doors and STOL capabilty.
Richard
The three wire locked screws are threaded into what looks like a thin steel plate, rather than the usual anchor nut/captive nut arrangement found on aircraft, almost making me think they are not aircraft parts at all, but the wire locking is most certainly a feature found almost exclusivley on aircraft.
Also the geometry of the hinge looks to only allow a limited opening angle.
Not a lot of help im,e afraid.
Richard