dark light

Camlobe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 325 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: DH Heron G-AORG #1362284
    Camlobe
    Participant

    Heard a romour that it is Coventry bound. Anybody able to confirm?

    in reply to: MAM's Gannet #1362300
    Camlobe
    Participant

    Nice job everyone.

    in reply to: Dakota landing on aircraft carrier #1362303
    Camlobe
    Participant

    Back in, I think, 1985, in the middle of the murky Med, we did an overshoot of USS Nimitz. Didn’t look to big to me, sat in the nose, when I first saw if appear out of the murk. Problem was it kept getting bigger. And bigger.

    Oh, sorry. I forgot to mention we were in a Shack. You wouldn’t believe some of the comments on the radio!!

    in reply to: Spitfire and Concorde in the final #1362329
    Camlobe
    Participant

    These are my personal thoughts and you won’t offend me by not agreeing with my point of view.

    Concorde is the most beautiful piece of aeroengineering ever created. It doesn’t look bad from any angle. As a matter of opinion, it looks beautiful from every angle. It has served the UK proudly, quite rightly being classed as the perfect flag carrier for Britain. Beautifully designed, beautifully maintained and beautifully flown for over two decades, it is a masterpiece. It rightly deserves to win this important competition.

    The iconic map of the London Underground is one of the most recognised publications around the world. It signifies simplicity of design with perfect function. It is comfortingly familiar to regular viewers while still welcomingly understandable to strangers. It rightly deserves to win this important competition.

    I voted for the Spit.

    in reply to: Canberra cockpit project anyone ? #1364033
    Camlobe
    Participant

    Go for it people. As you know, I already have put my money where my mouth is. Someone elses turn now. And you know it is worth it. Oh, and good luck.

    Camlobe
    Participant

    So, another great chapter in the history of the greatest navy in the world passes into the history books. Farewell, you excellent defenders of the nation. To the Sea Harrier, its crews and to the engineering staff, you have served with distinction and can proudly rest, knowing you have never been found wanting in times of need.
    I salute you all.

    in reply to: Chilean Phantoms #1364063
    Camlobe
    Participant

    Heard a lot of similar mentions at the time and afterwards. Nothing in writing though.

    in reply to: Aviation named pets #1364072
    Camlobe
    Participant

    I like the idea of a cat called Shackleton. Can’t think why. Of course, you could have called one of your current ones ‘AEW II’, the only proper follow-on to a Shack. Probably get overruled on that one as well though.

    in reply to: Blenheim at Duxford today – old thread #1364076
    Camlobe
    Participant

    Well, I think it will be quite a sight to see the Mk I nose infer ont of the fuselage. 😀 😀 😀

    in reply to: Anyone recognise this? #406902
    Camlobe
    Participant

    jbritchford, the guy I knew was Chris Britchford. He did a lot of time on Shackletons and the Harrier force in Germany. Don’t know if this helps.

    Sorry everybody from straying from the thread.

    in reply to: Some advice/help please #406905
    Camlobe
    Participant

    neal h, I’m with Trinny on this one. Can’t give you any advice, good or bad, unless we know what taildragger you have been offered.

    in reply to: FAA Museum Barracuda on EBAY!!! :-( #1367900
    Camlobe
    Participant

    Seaking93, could you please update us as and when there is a final result? Thanks.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain – British technology #1367930
    Camlobe
    Participant

    Over here in the West it is also REALLY SLOW tonight.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain – British technology #1367933
    Camlobe
    Participant

    Stupid me. I have just realised something else that may be relevant to your project. Namely, the intuition used to decieve technology. I refer to the utilisation of more natural elements to overcome the technological advances. Specifically, the use of Navajo Indians (or more correctly, First Nation) radio operators for the Americians and Welsh radio operators for the RAF etc to prevent the opposition, with, at the time, high quality radio listening devices, from knowing what was being said in the air. And it worked.

    in reply to: Aircrew medical #407056
    Camlobe
    Participant

    You are very welcome.

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 325 total)