:confused: lol really?? 😮 😮 heh
Iranian Aircraft Manufacturing Industries (HESA), near Esfahan, has so far modified nine retired F-5As to F-5B Simorgh ( a mystical persian bird) configration, with help of Pakistani engineers. This modification which adds a second cockpit, is to fulfill an IRIAF requirement for more fast jet trainers. All the aircraft serve with the training unit based at Shiraz.
I think Impressive is a gross overstatement . What are the acheivments that make it impressive ??
Oh did i mention Simorgh, the F-5A to F-5B conversion by the Iran Aircraft Manufacturing Industries (IAMI) at Shahin Shahr Isfahan with the help of Pakistani Engineers. 😀
I think Impressive is a gross overstatement . What are the acheivments that make it impressive ??
Tazarve
Azarakhsh
Parastoo
Dorna
Fajr-1
Ava-202
PC-7 (engineered)
Shahed 274
Shavabiz 75
Project 2061
Project 2091
Iran-140 (Antonob-140)
(I kept Saegeh-80 out of this list deliberately)
The numbers are conflicting when it comes to numbers in service the Iranian’s are rather sensibly for them keeping their cards close to their chests.
true. Iran has always been very secretive regarding its aircraft inventory. There are various versions of the “numbers” in inventory.
Love their Fencers and their latest Su-39’s !
P.S. I love the “nun” sitting in the cockpit of that fighter jet….was quite funny although I’m sure I’m not supposed to be laughing….lol.
If you’re not supposed to be laughing why post this then ? :rolleyes:
The “nun” is your average Muslim woman in proper Islamic dress code. She is the project co-ordinator for the Shafagh.
So all in all a sensible move for Iran, their aerospace industry will benefit from the input of advanced technology and a trainer is always a good starting point when you want to improve your aerospace industry.
It certainly fits in with Irans drive for self reliance in this area and for Russia they get a discreet influx of cash and work as well as increased influence in the region.
Iran is really on the clock now they can only maintain their fleet of T-33, F-5, F-4 and F-14 for a finite amount of time. An aircraft like this would allow them to start retiring their training aircraft and possibly even some of the F-5.
Iran already has quite an impressive aerospace infrastructure thanks to the warm relations the Shah had with the U.S. He was a keen aviation enthusiast too.
Iran Aircraft Industries(IACI) was setup by Northrop Grumman in the 70’s. Bell Textron also set up a facility where Iran’s entire chopper fleet can be rebuilt/manufactured.
So yeah, they already have a “few” things that give them a headstart.
Found this video on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nlisMTMsgM&mode=related&search=
Not sure if its a mock up or not and I don’t go with the Stealth bit but nevertheless an interesting insight into Iranian aerospace thinking.
Anyone speak Farsi so we can know what there saying!?
That’s a Mock-up which was displayed at the Kish Air Show 2003/04.
Last Kish Air show also had a miniature one in desert camo. The project has now been inherited by Malek Ashtar University.
The first flight is hoped for 2008. Currently the Iranian media refers to it as a trainer aircraft. Its roots are not that of a trainer though. (Vityaz I-2000).
My take on the shafagh is that it will end up in a light attack configuration too. The M-ATF will be the attack version of this concept, pick a persian name for it. Guaranteed. This is a smart move by Iran. Russia is making this plane for them. Both in trainer and attack configuration.

VITYAZ

SHAFAGH trainer
Officially Russia is out. Unofficially they are very much in !! 😀
Sweden focuses on Erieye fleet changes , Janes IDR, Aug 2006
Sweden may put four of its Saab S 100B Argus airborne early warning (AEW) aircraft (Saab 340Bs equipped with the Ericsson Microwave Systems-developed Erieye radar system) up for sale if plans currently being discussed become reality. The plans call for an extensive upgrade of just two of the six Erieye-equipped Saab 340s in the Swedish Air Force (SwAF) to a new standard that will include three permanently installed operator workstations. That would change the role of the platform from pure AEW (which in the Swedish concept has been limited to downlinking the radar picture to ground-based command-and-control [C2] centres) to airborne surveillance and control (ASC) — hence the new designation of S 100D ASC.
In this new capacity, the platform will become capable of functioning as an airborne C2 asset, not just in Swedish airspace within line-of-sight to the country’s national air-defence ground environment, but worldwide in support of international crisis response operations. Negotiations between the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration (FMV) and Ericsson Microwave Systems and Saab (the latter company is expected to take over the former by September 2006) are continuing and could lead to a contract for the S 100D ASC conversion programme by the end of this year (2006). The ASC-capable platforms will then become available from 2009.
The more comprehensive ASC system for the two S 100D aircraft is known by the Swedish military as the ASC 890 system, replacing the original FSR 890 configuration (FSR standing for Flygburna Spaningsradarsystem or airborne reconnaissance radar system). In addition to the three operator consoles, new capabilities to be installed include a NATO-standard Link 16 tactical data link and Have Quick II secure radio communications, which will enable participation in networked operations with coalition fighters, helicopters, ground-based air-defense systems and naval forces. There will also be a satellite communications capability to link with strategic headquarters at home or beyond the horizon in the theatre of operations.
Furthermore, the system will be compatible with NATO IFF (identification friend-or-foe) Mode 4.
According to information presented on 16 June 2006 at an event at Såtenäs Air Base to mark the 80th anniversary of the SwAF, the ASC 890 equipment suite will include the following:
• the Ericsson Erieye radar with 2×150š coverage to beyond 250 n miles (450 km)*;
• a Thales IFF Mk XII interrogator system with 360š coverage to beyond 250 n miles (Mode 1, 2, 3/A, 3/C and 4);
• five Rockwell Collins Talon 8105 VHF/UHF radios for tactical voice communication with Have Quick II (one also covering the tactical 30-88 MHz VHF band);
• two radios supporting Link 16; and
• it will be fitted for but not with satcom equipment.
Sources in the Swedish armed forces told Jane’s that finding a customer for the four Erieye-equipped Saab 340s (or two customers buying two aircraft each) will not be impossible because there will be “a lot of interest from countries who require an AEW capability but for whom existing systems, including Erieye integrated on the Embraer EMB 145 twin-jet or the Saab 2000 larger twin turboprop, are simply too expensive”.
SwAF operators at Malmen Air Base outside Linköping have already been gathering some experience in the ASC role over the past two years, using two aircraft — which were returned from Greece after being employed by the Hellenic Air Force (HAF) — equipped with two operator workstations each, as an interim capability prior to the delivery by prime contractor Ericsson of four Erieye-equipped Embraer EMB 145 aircraft to the HAF during 2004-05.
The two modified aircraft, known as S 100D by the SwAF (the original workstation-less configuration is the S 100B), have kept their operator consoles in order to give the SwAF the chance to gather operational ASC experience, operators told Jane’s. As an example, the S 100D participated in the German Air Force flying exercise ‘ELITE 2005’, working in a networked set-up with a German ground control centre and Swedish ground-based air-defence forces.
Despite these more or less firm plans, the next step is already on the horizon. It will involve porting the complete ASC 890 system from the current Saab 340 platform to the larger and more capable (in terms of endurance, operating ceiling and hot-and-high performance) Saab 2000.
According to S 100D Argus aircrew at Malmen, the upgrade to the Saab 2000 could happen as early as 2015, although no official plans have been presented. “We will continue with just two platforms, but with the Saab 2000 all our current operational deficiencies would be solved,” a crew member told Jane’s, referring to the altitude and mission endurance restrictions that are inherent to the Saab 340.
Such a SwAF upgrade to the Saab 2000 will benefit significantly from the Saab 2000 Erieye programme for Pakistan. That country has signed a contract for six Erieye-equipped Saab 2000 ASC aircraft with prime contractor Saab, coming into effect on 22 July 2006. The Pakistani contract allows the SwAF to take maximum advantage of experience gathered by Saab in installing the Erieye suite in the Saab 2000, an aircraft that is no longer in production but will be taken out of the commercial market.
“There are approximately 60 Saab 2000s left in service, of which Saab owns approximately 50 per cent through its aircraft leasing business activity,” Saab officials told Jane’s. “Most of them are in operation with civilian airlines but the regional commuter market is very fluid, which means it will not be a problem to have the aircraft available when we need them. The six aircraft for Pakistan are all part of the Saab lease pool, so we know all the details about them. The aircraft will be fully zero-houred and will receive new engines.”
According to Saab spokesperson Marinette Radobo, the Saab 2000 ASC platform will have an operational endurance of more than nine hours and “excellent performance in hot-and-high environmental conditions”.
The six-aircraft package for Pakistan has been dimensioned to allow the country to maintain 24/7 surveillance of its airspace. The ASC capability will be used for national air defence as well as for C2 of air operations, for example during contingencies such as the earthquake disaster of October 2005. At the time, it proved difficult to provide air traffic control for the many humanitarian aid flights in the remote part of Pakistan that was struck by the disaster.
Talk about cyclical arguementation on the basis of dubious commentary.
“I talk,
therefore I am,I insist,
so it must be true.”:-/
Dude, you’re trying too hard and yes the above doesnt make any sense or apply here.
Before you too start making outrageous claims like Bisons better than F-15’s and F-16’s, i say just stop ruining the thread.
Greenday1 please stop this right now. India has the fastest growing online population (recently revealed by US Internet firm comScore Networks) and to convince every one of them that P-3C is better than some Tupolev MPA or Augusta better than Kilo is impossible. It doesn’t really matter.
Just stop, all of u right now.
(P.S. : we’re trying to revive the army forums here and u guys are ruining it for us).
As far as acquiring new aircraft for IAF is concerned, Air Marshal MM Singh (retd), former Air Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Command, says IAF would be better off buying more MIG-29s or Mirage 2000 instead of F-16s. “SU-30 and MIG-29 can match F-16 if not prove their superiority over it,” he says.
A wise decision, no doubt.
Just for ur information guys,
– according to JANES : PAKISTAN PLUGGING THE GAPS, Pakistan will be operating 10 P-3C Orions fully upgraded by Mid-2009. All 10 by mid-2009.
– JF-17’s start coming from March 2007 (with SD-10 I assume).
– Babur is being navalised as we speak.
– The 26 refurbished F-16 A/B’s will be delivered next year along with the gradual delivery of the Block 52’s. (which i think will take atleast 3 years).
– As for Marlins, lets keep them out of the discussion. There is no confirmation/indication on them yet.
And gents, lets keep this discussion civilised. You dont wanna lose the Navy forums like the Army ones.
Ok guys cut it out all of you. You dont wanna lose the Navy forums like the Army ones.
Ok guys…..when it gets to posts like Mig-21 Bisons better than F-15’s and F-16’s…
Qantaz, I have no idea what you’ve been smoking, but whatever it is I can tell ya its good ****!!!
Cool videos containing footage of the Indo-Pak air wars :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjZ4t8urIn0
http://www.pakdef.info/multimedia/guncamera_ata.wmv
http://www.pakdef.info/multimedia/groundattack_65war.wmv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twHSpQfbiZk&mode=related&search=
Enjoy.
DRDO muddles through 439 projects:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1896347.cms
New Delhi: From missiles, radars and electronic warfare programmes to even juices, mosquito repellents and titanium dental implants, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) does it all. And, by and large, flounders in them all, with technical glitches, time and cost overruns.
Amid growing demand by armed forces and experts that DRDO “concentrate” only on “a few core and critical areas” to bolster the country’s defence preparedness, latest statistics show the organisation has as many as 439 ongoing projects at a total cost of a whopping Rs 16,925 Crore (US $ 3.64 Billion)*. “DRDO, with around 29,000 personnel in 50 laboratories and establishments under its umbrella, certainly needs to get its act together. Not even 10% of its total budget (DRDO got Rs 5,454 Crore (US $ 1.17 Billion)* in 2006-07) is spent on fundamental research,” says a senior defence official.
Adds an Army officer, “What is the use of having such a huge defence R&D set-up if it cannot even come up with basics like good bullet-proof jackets, webbing and light-weight ballistic helmets. Even the systems they manage to deliver to us suffer from operational problems.”
The long-standing aim to take the country towards self-reliance in military capabilities, of course, remains a mere pipedream. If in 1991-92, 25% of India’s total defence expenditure was spent on imports, the case remains the same even now.
DRDO, of course, has to contend with inadequate funds, with its allocation hovering just around 6% of the total defence budget. Moreover, it’s not able to attract top scientific talent in the absence of good career prospects and other incentives.
But even Prime Minister Manmohan Singh recently told DRDO he was “concerned by the problems of cost and time-overruns, which have plagued our defence industry for decades now”.
Consequently, it’s no wonder that the armed forces prefer the import route because of DRDO’s long track-record of delivering too-little, too-late. Of the 439 projects, for instance, the really big ones number around 20. But the progress in them, more or less, has been shoddy.
The Arjun main-battle tank project, for one, was sanctioned way back in 1974. After spending a huge amount of money, the first five Arjun tanks are still being tested for battle-worthiness, with the Army not too keen to induct them.
Similar is the story with Tejas Light Combat Aircraft, sanctioned in 1983 to replace the country’s ageing MiG fleet. Though its prototypes have completed over 530 flights, IAF is not fully convinced yet whether it will induct them by even 2012. This when government has already sanctioned Rs 5,489.78 Crore (US $ 1.18 Billion)* for Tejas till now.
The country’s integrated guided missile development programme, which kicked off in 1983, has only now shown some progress, with a few Prithvi and Agni missile variants being inducted into the armed forces.