dark light

Canpark

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,271 through 3,285 (of 3,399 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RAAF and ASEAN Air Forces #2650121
    Canpark
    Participant

    Canpark, they have longer range than our F-18’s, so what would be the problem?

    It occurs to me that Australia never look to Russia when it comes to combat aircraft, those guys produce aircraft that is good in both terms of technology and range, but they are cheaper then American or western-European aircrafts.

    So money is one thing I would like to point out as a problem.

    in reply to: RAAF and ASEAN Air Forces #2651328
    Canpark
    Participant

    I have been pushing for the RAAF to get a warplane beside the F-35.

    d’clacy,
    when you say ‘pushing’ does that mean you have connections with the inside or something? or maybe a member of the Defence Force? :confused:

    I think the F-35 is NOT a good choice because I heard if you take the stealth technology away from this plane, its only slightly better then the Hornets we already have, but why didn’t the RAAF consider the F-22?
    As for Gripen, EF-2000 and Rafael, they are good choices but consider the logistical support it needs for a short-range aircraft flying in the vast airspace of Australia. It would be a major headache for the military planners.

    As for Australia’s future, the only possible threat is terrorism, as demonstrated by the Bali bombings and the recent suicide bomber attack outside our Embassy in Jakarta. Invading or attacking a country like Australia is quite impossible because of the geographic position, but I would like to see who have the patience and money to take on Australia in a military confrontation.

    in reply to: RAAF and ASEAN Air Forces #2651527
    Canpark
    Participant

    Can we put this RACIST issue behind and get back on the topic of airpower?

    Oh, since the RNZAF retire and put its fleet of A-4 Skyhawks up for sale, does anyone actually show interest in those planes?

    in reply to: Iran`s Shafaqh fighter #2652558
    Canpark
    Participant

    Can you provide us with some technical data?

    in reply to: Libyan Air Force #2652624
    Canpark
    Participant

    Since when did Algeria buy the Su-30s?

    in reply to: RAAF and ASEAN Air Forces #2652630
    Canpark
    Participant

    OK before things get a little nasty I think this discussion about Australians being racist should stop.

    I’m over that now…

    in reply to: China and Backfires AGAIN!? #2652634
    Canpark
    Participant

    I don’t think China would aquire Tu-22M, it is very unlikely and whoever think this is going to happen is an idiot.

    in reply to: Small Airforces Pics Request #2652640
    Canpark
    Participant

    Which is why I’d like to get my paws on the original unmodded picture of this bird in PLAAF markings.

    Mate, you should visit http://www.sinodefence.com

    in reply to: Carrier using nations.. #2073175
    Canpark
    Participant

    [QUOTE]

    Can: no worries mate, actually Melbourne was my real love, she was the reason I joined the navy, ever since I saw her docked in Woolloomaloo with Skyhawks and Trackers Wessex and Seakings on her decks back in the mid 70’s (me being a kid back then) I knew I wanted to be in the military (my father was in the military as well). I wanted to fly those Skyhawks and lost all my drive in 83 when I watched her getting towed from the reserve slips in Atoll Bight.

    Ja,
    how long did you serve in the navy?…its good to see someone with the same passion as me, but I want to join the army instead and I LOVE Australian military history.

    in reply to: Carrier using nations.. #2073263
    Canpark
    Participant

    In the early 80’s, the Fraser government were discussing with the British government, the possibility of buying the Carrier HMS Ark Royal (the last of the class and the only one not needed). There came a change of government and in June of 82 Melbourne was retired and July 83 she was towed to China to be broken up.

    Broken up?!!! Damn! Damn! Damn!

    Instead of doing that the Australian government could’ve have put it in a naval museum somewhere, I think its important that Australia preserve the ship for the sake of history, instead of sending to China to be broken up!

    By the way Ja, thanks for the info.

    in reply to: A tribute to the Slovenian Air Force #2653316
    Canpark
    Participant

    I think Serbia stand between rich and poor in the former Yugoslavia.

    in reply to: Carrier using nations.. #2073305
    Canpark
    Participant

    why doesnt australia still use them…it seems perfectly logical for them to use it

    Once in a while Australia’s military planners do something really stupid, I agree that it is logical for Australia to use it, but money is somewhat an issue.
    The RAN’s fleet was once unmatchable by other countries in the region, with the strike force consist of A-4 Skyhawks and other aircraft, the RAN is a very potent fleet for a navy that is small in international standard.

    in reply to: Carrier using nations.. #2073309
    Canpark
    Participant

    Australia used to have them……… 🙁

    Australia used to operate the HMAS Melbourne as the fleet’s flagship, but I wondering what happen to it after it was put out of service.

    Aircraft carriers in Australia have a very sad history, in 1964 HMAS Melbourne collided with a destroyer during an exercise off Jervis Bay, and in the 1980s Australia decided not to replace the ship and the RAN is without an aircraft carrier strike force.

    in reply to: China emerges as a maritime power #2073316
    Canpark
    Participant

    China emerging as a maritime power?

    But they have so many obsolete warships in desperate need of replacement, if China was to engage another maritme power such as the U.S, I think those ships would make very little difference in terms of technology.

    in reply to: Small Airforces Pics Request #2653321
    Canpark
    Participant

    Yes, it is a pity really. I would love a some authentic photos of a Myanmarese F-7s carrying a Litening pod pod, a load of LGB’s or Pyhon IIIs. 😀 wishful thinking 😀 I have been looking for photos of Myanmarese aircraft for a long time with hardly any luck.

    I think the actual aircraft in the photo actually a Chinese air force plane, but someone did a very bad job of putting that Myanmar marking on it.
    Just like you, I did some extensive search to find Myanmar air force jets, but with no success, I also I want to see their F-7s and MiG-29s as well.

    And thank you for posting that picture.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,271 through 3,285 (of 3,399 total)