dark light

schurem

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 274 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2221353
    schurem
    Participant

    nice one geoff. that thing had just the weirdest way of carrying heatseekers for self defence. the move it is making, is it tossing those 500 pounders ‘over the shoulder’ or is it just showin off for the camera?

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2226022
    schurem
    Participant

    Yes it is, in real life such huge warloads are never carried because they shorten the range. But in a pinch the mudhen can carpet bomb the neighbors like a boss 😉

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2226037
    schurem
    Participant

    Very beautiful picture, but OMFG what an ugly aircraft.. that belly! Lighting, you’re getting fat, get to the gym you slob!

    Or are they perhaps lady lightnings carrying little tiffies?

    Anyway if you like full-bodied aircraft:

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-c5PzWeRg6iQ/UnLDK1yoo2I/AAAAAAAAAOM/EVgRla3I8-I/s640/988b929b634f600dd88f6a49cfb94839.jpg

    😛

    This one on the other hand looks downright anorexic:

    http://avstop.com/news/needle.jpg

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2229342
    schurem
    Participant

    pretty picture of a pretty aircraft

    that dont look real to me but dang if it aint purty!

    in reply to: Japan's stealth plane #2289080
    schurem
    Participant

    the inlets and strangely the nose wheel door. they do not want the chinese to know its not actually serrated 😛

    in reply to: fighter agility #2292268
    schurem
    Participant

    Actually roll rate is quite the underrated agility stat. In any kind of scissors situation the faster rolling aircraft has a huge advantage. You can yoyo your behind out of a turn rate disadvantage, but you cant turn your way round someone who just rolled out of the plane of your turn so fast you cant follow him.

    Second (IMO) to that are energy related things such as thrust/weight ratio and energy retention (drag).
    There’s a reason the starfighter was considered a fine fighter and it wasnt its awesome sustained turn ability.

    in reply to: On Helos #2219542
    schurem
    Participant

    Afaik the Ka-50 / 52 yaws very very quick indeed because it it is a coaxial design. It is shorter and therefore the yawing motion has less inertia than a longer design with a tail rotor. On the other hand, you need to be more careful about “blade slap”; having the two rotor discs hit eachother due to harsh pitch changes or being hamfisted with the collective. Its also not very stable if the simulation is anything to go by. (the sim i base these comments on is this very detailed consumer product made in Russia)

    The Kamovs do not have a system similar to the NOTAR. I wonder why that never took off. It seems such an elegant solution.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2014 #2225583
    schurem
    Participant

    so what did it say?

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2014 #2228186
    schurem
    Participant

    Congress cancels over-time and over-budget jet. “Just like a sick, overweight puppy that can’t be healed, we had to put it down” states the chairman in a april 1st press release.

    F-35 Cancelled due to Cost Overruns, Performance Shortfalls

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2232331
    schurem
    Participant

    ermagurd that is sierra hotel!!

    in reply to: future of ukrainian air force? #2238044
    schurem
    Participant

    ok you guys are right, its a bad joke. its tasteless and offensive and i will edit the post right away. thanks for setting me straight. it seemed funny to me when i thought it up.

    in reply to: future of ukrainian air force? #2238065
    schurem
    Participant

    I sincerely hope it stays bloodless. That said, re the thread title:

    “The Future of Ukrainian Air Force”

    [picture of a crashing jet removed]

    in reply to: A great blessing #2244945
    schurem
    Participant

    You so logical! it all makes perfect sense! how can it be otherwise?!

    in reply to: ATGM vs APS #1789012
    schurem
    Participant

    Very interesting. Means a gun is actually the best system to use against these tanks again. Or a very fast missile that can strike inside the reaction time of the system. Or perhaps just a dog with a couple pounds of semtex and a bit of training 😉

    in reply to: What metrics of Agility and Maneuverability matter #2249293
    schurem
    Participant

    I find it odd that noone has mentioned roll rate yet. It’s pretty darn important in making yourself hard to hit when it comes to guns.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 274 total)