dark light

Wanshan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,461 through 2,475 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2067512
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Rather similar to LPD-17 if you ask me…
    Below similar aspect image of LPD17 w/o integrated masts

    in reply to: Viggen on carriers? Feasible or not? #2067715
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Nice movie! Viggen is one nasty a$$ airplane. AFA looks are concerned, Í’m sorry our airforce got F16s rather than Viggen.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2067937
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Thanks for the update Wan, that first pic of the carrier with the guys walking away from her, is it just me or does she actually look rather small in the pic? No I have taken distance into account, look at the scaffolding on the side, one section is just over six foot high in regulation scaf structures, there are a few sections odf scaf there nad if the size is regulation then she is a lot smaller than I have been lead to believe.

    Those guys are also higher up than Gorshkov is.

    in reply to: Navy news from around the world, news & discussion #2067999
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Interesting comment, suggesting that she may go to see under someone else’s ensign.

    India is unlikely given budgetary constraints and their transition to CTOL, who else might be interested in an Invincible?

    Unicorn

    She won’t fly the white ensign but won’t be sold either.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2068001
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Trenton: six H-3 Sea King transport helicopters and an assortment of smaller boats. New Delhi purchased the ship for a $ 48.44 million, including choppers and boats, a prize that some officials said was a bargain. [note: 48 mil probably does not include choppers, see blurb below]

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Indian_Navy_takes_charge_of_American_ship_Trenton/articleshow/1262037.cms

    In another sign of the growing cooperation between the United States and India, the Indian navy will buy six former U.S. Navy H-3 Sea King helicopters. Naval Air Systems Command and the Support and Commercial Derivative Aircraft program office (PMA-207) were instrumental in this $39 million Foreign Military Sales agreement, signed Nov. 15.

    Aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya, formerly the Russian Navy’s Admiral Gorshkov, will arrive in Mumbai in two years

    Gorshkov to be inducted into Navy by end-2008

    MUMBAI, NOV 30 (PTI)The Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Gorshkov will be inducted into the Indian Navy as INS Vikramaditya by the end of 2008, a top naval officials said today.
    Top-line MiG-29 aircraft would be inducted along with the carrier to augment the air arm of the navy, Vice Admiral Sangram Singh Byce, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command, told reporters on board the country’s sole carrier INS Viraat.

    http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/7559/vik2lg6.jpg
    http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/8848/vik3dl4.jpg

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2068039
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Hi,

    a few questions about USS Trenton/INS Jalashva LPD on IN service:

    1) what’s the current armament of the USS Trenton/INS Jalashva LPD?

    2) Which helicopters should be used by Indian Navy aboard?

    3) Regarding the Vulcan CIWS, IN usualy operate Russian CIWS like AK-630 and AK-230. Is there any intention to replace the Vulcan CIWS in order to guarantee standarts with others ship’s fleet?

    thanks
    Ayala

    1. Last known armanment: two 20mm Phalanx CIWS, two 25mm Mk 38 guns, eight .50-calibre machine guns. I expect the Phalanx and possibly all other armement to have been removed.

    2. Helicopters: can provide only limited support, telescopic hangar installed aboard. The hangar is not used to accommodate helicopters but on the flight deck there is space for up to six CH-46 helicopters. Expect the Sea King Mk.42C helicopter to be used and possibly the indigenously-built HAL Dhruv helicopter.

    3. Easiest would be to install a few CRN-91 AAA mounted on stabilised optronic pedestals (2A42 30mm Medak guns on BMP-2 turrets, adapted for naval use). Another easy one would be shoulder-held 9K38 Igla-M (SA-N-10) SAM launcher. Chaff launchers. If something with more punch was thought to be needed, I’ld expect Barak to be installed. Other (though much less likely) options include Kashtan CIWS, AK630, OTO Melera Super Rapid 76mm main gun, Type WM-18A 140mm 18-tube rocket launchers.

    in reply to: 17.Jan.1991: "Operation Desert Storm" begins #2530449
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Although Coalition casualties were relatively low, it was no walk in the park.

    That’s what I said.

    in reply to: Impression of the OPV for RNLN #2068134
    Wanshan
    Participant

    If one can fit car’s with proximity warning devices for parking purposes, why not warships?

    in reply to: 17.Jan.1991: "Operation Desert Storm" begins #2530960
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Maybe the point was merely that even though losses were very low that doesn’t mean it was a cakewalk for the crews involved.

    in reply to: Impression of the OPV for RNLN #2068195
    Wanshan
    Participant

    See attached some pictures that I found on a Dutch naval board.

    If I connect that to an article in IDR of November, where the CEO Arno Peels is interviewed:

    “The next step is the introduction of a rather revolutionary new above-water warfare sensor suite based on non-rotating radar technology installed in a highly integrated mast module,” Peels says. “The SMART-S Mk 2 was to a significant extent based on re-use of existing modules. The innovation that we’re now planning is continuing this approach in the integrated mast programme. The key sensors to be included in this single-mast package will be the new SMILE radar for medium-range volume search, the new SEASTAR radar for surface search and the new Gatekeeper electro-optical camera suite. The last is designed to provide 360TH situational awareness against asymmetrical threats.”

    Now the contents of the mast becomes a little bit clear: two type of radars plus IR and TV… all non rotating!

    The first of class OPV for the RNLN is planned for 2009-2010.
    Length around 100 meters, and 3000 tons

    This OPV looks a lot like the Falcon class corvette on p 6 of http://www.iv-groep.nl/en/docs/bro-nevesbu-en.pdf and on page 24 of http://www.iv-groep.nl/en/docs/ivormatie.2005.1.en.pdf
    The Falcon Class Corvette is a joint design of Iv-Nevesbu and Merwede Shipyard in the Netherlands

    in reply to: 17.Jan.1991: "Operation Desert Storm" begins #2532020
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Without a doubt, one of the iconic images of the 90s, if not the 20th century.

    That (AAA over Bagdad) plus MLRS firing in the desert, and Kuweiti oilfields burning.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2068205
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Thanks wanshan

    Thanks but to be honest, Radar had it right first.

    in reply to: Improved FREMM #2068208
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Must be a Dutch joke to call a radar smart-ass.

    Someboday had some fun, that’s for sure 🙂

    in reply to: PLAN Thread (Pics, news, speculations…everything) – 2 #2068211
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I thought LPD was Landing ship, platform, dock

    Daniel

    Hi Dan,

    Landing Platform Dock a.k.a. Amphibious Transport, Dock:
    Amphibious Transport Dock [LPD] ships transport and land Marines, their equipment and supplies by embarked landing craft or amphibious vehicles augmented by helicopters in amphibious assault. These versatile ships replace amphibious transports (APA), amphibious cargo ships (AKA), older landing ship (LSD), tank landing ship (LST), and the attack cargo ship (LKA).

    Landing Ship Dock a.k.a. Dock Landing Ships:
    Dock Landing Ships support amphibious operations including landings via Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC), conventional landing craft and helicopters, onto hostile shores. These ships transport and launch amphibious craft and vehicles with their crews and embarked personnel in amphibious assault operations and render limited docking and repair services to small ships and craft.

    Different role emphasis, I suppose.

    “Dock Landing Ships (LSD) support amphibious operations including landings via Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC), conventional landing craft and helicopters, onto hostile shores. These ships transport and launch amphibious craft and vehicles with their crews and embarked personnel in amphibious assault operations. Amphibious Transport Docks (LPD) transport and land Marines, their equipment and supplies by embarked landing craft or amphibious vehicles augmented by helicopters in amphibious assault. These versatile ships perform the mission of amphibious transports, amphibious cargo ships and the older LSDs by incorporating both a flight deck and a well deck that can be ballasted and deballasted to support landing craft. “

    “LPD stands for Landing Platform Dock although the ship is usually referred to as an Amphibious Transport Dock (LPD)”
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/ld.htm

    in reply to: 17.Jan.1991: "Operation Desert Storm" begins #2532097
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I remember getting the first footage on CNN at about 1:30 in the morning: grainy, greenish night vision shot of sky over Bagdad, lit up by AAA tracer.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,461 through 2,475 (of 3,544 total)