drone… drone… aren’t these just model planes?
Actually, today we do not celebrate the birtday of Beatrix, but of Wilhelmina. Other than that you are correct.
Actuallay, the Queen Mother Wilhelmina was born 31 augustus 1880. It is not her birthday that is being celebrated but that of her daughter, the later queeen Juliana, who was born on 30 april 1908. When her daughter Beatrix took the throne 25 years ago, in 1980, she decided to keep the ‘Queensday’ celebration on April 30, even though she herself was born on 31 januari 1938.
Cheers mate, “Oranje boven”!
Pic1
Canadian Halifax class frigate FFH 336 Montreal
Norwegian Oslo class light frigate F302 Trondheim
German Brandenburg class (Type 123) frigate F217 Bayern
Portugese Vasco da Gama class (MEKO 200 type) frigate F332 Corte Real
Pic 2
Berlin class (Type 702) multi-product replenishment ship A1412 FRANKFURT AM MAIN
Dutch Jacob Van Heemskerck (“L”) class air defense frigate F 813 Witte De With (sold to Chili)
Canadian Halifax class frigate FFH 336 Montreal
American Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate (Long Hull Group) FFG 8 McInerney
Pic 3
American Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate (Long Hull Group) FFG 8 McInerney
Canadian Halifax class frigate FFH 336 Montreal
Pic 4
Berlin class (Type 702) multi-product replenishment ship A1412 FRANKFURT AM MAIN
Pic 5
Berlin class (Type 702) multi-product replenishment ship A1412 FRANKFURT AM MAIN
Pic 6
Berlin class (Type 702) multi-product replenishment ship A1412 FRANKFURT AM MAIN
Dutch Jacob Van Heemskerck (“L”) class air defense frigate F 813 Witte De With
Canadian Halifax class frigate FFH 336 Montreal
American Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate (Long Hull Group) FFG 8 McInerney
Pic 7
Portugese Vasco da Gama class (MEKO 200 type) frigate F332 Corte Real
German Brandenburg class (Type 123) frigate F217 Bayern
It seems all ships are flying the Dutch red-white-and-blue. If these pics are from today, then this is in recognition of April 30, the day on which the Dutch celebrate the birthday of their Queen Beatrice. This year she has been queen for 25 years i.e. a jubilee.
If both Brazil and Argentinia got in on India’s ADS project … bigger production run, lower unit cost.
why is it strange for the Virkramditya to have boilers ?
It’s not strange although, with a few exceptions, most warships these days have diesel engines and/or gasturbines for propulsion.
The ship is the German Type 404 TENDER A-511 (FGS ELBE)
The pic of the ship originated here
The port is Djibouti. The Republic of Djibouti is a small country (8,250 square miles – about the size of Massachusetts) in the Horn of Africa, at the juncture of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.
It might – just might! – be able to mount the Erickson Erieye radar but even that may be too big.
Nah, I think people have simply lost interest because nothing is happening with it. There have been pictures of other (new) hulls located just a couple of hundred meters from Varyag so it is not that it would be very hard to take new pictures of her.
Projected STOVL-variant, developed form the Yak-45
Thanks for clarifying, it’s nice to get some more detail from someone local.
On the 140 without the hanger, the Box just above the guys head, is that some sort of optics? If so, why is it facing aft and not mounted high up either on the bridge or on a mast?
The boxy thing is quite common on helicopter equiped frigates. I’don’t know exactly what it is but am guessing that it is some sort of landing aid.
Aerospace said two of these NASA designs looked like Soviet aircraft… that implies nothing except they look similar.
You stated… and I quote:
In other words you stated that the Soviets adopted these NASA designs… you then pose that they might have gotten the designs from NASA directly.
Aerospace made no such connection as I think you will agree no such connection has been suggested by anyone but you.
In spite of what you say, I have not suggested or wanted to suggest that the US designed designed Mig25 or YAK 45/47, nor – as I clearly explained – that there was any actual espionage. Go ahead and belief otherwise if that makes your day. However, I would like to post here just like anybody else and not have every single word nitpicked or twisted. I’ve not sought a beef with you so leave me the hell alone, mr Brookes. At least Aerospacetech had the decency to answer some of the questions I phrased.
The two countries may not be ready yet for such cooperation in the area of naval design and construction.
In 1978, during the dictatorships in Chile and Argentina (1976-1983), the two countries reached the brink of war over control of three Beagle Channel islands, Picton, Lennox and Nueva.
Chile and Argentina share a borderline stretching over 5,000 kilometres along the length of the Andes mountains, which was established through a July 1881 treaty that also granted Chile sovereignty over the Strait of Magellan, the western portion of Tierra del Fuego and the islands south of the Beagle Channel.
After numerous territorial disputes over the channel, an international arbitration panel declared in May 1977 that the islands of Picton, Lennox and Nueva definitely belonged to Chile. But Argentina refused to recognise the ruling.
Crisis soon broke out. On Dec. 21-22, 1978, the Chilean and Argentine fleets planned to face off in the disputed waters, but unfavourable weather conditions prevented the positioning of warships, the take-off of helicopters and the landing of troops.
On Dec. 22, Pope John Paul II intervened as a mediator and named Cardinal Antonio Samoré as his representative. The resulting negotiations finally reached a successful end on Nov. 29, 1984, with the signing of a Peace and Friendship Treaty between the countries in the Vatican.
Chile maintained control of the three islands, while Argentina was granted sovereignty over the waters in the eastern portion of the channel.
While the Beagle Channel islands dispute was resolved through Papal mediation in 1984, armed incidents persist since 1992 oil discovery; Chilean territorial claim in Antarctica (Chilean Antarctic Territory) partially overlaps Argentine and British claims.

Ahh, so the US designed the Mig-25 now? …Considering the surprise it was I somehow doubt it.
mr Brookes: Here we go again…did I say that the US designed the MIG25? Or the Yak45/47? I don’t think so! What struck me was that of the 4 NASA developed configurations 2 were similar to later US arcraft and 2 to later Soviet aircraft, at least according to the original poster (aerospacetech). Which lead me to wonder how this got to be: did NASA borrow ideas from the Soviets, or vice-versa, or was this some random confluence of ideas or a not-so-random confluence of ideas e.g. caused by the laws of aerodynamics and physics? If you have a problem with the implied association between the NASA configurations and F14/F15/Mig25/Yak45-47, go and complain to Aerospacetech. After all, that’s who made that connection, not me.
Distinguish:
– the basic fully equiped airframe (incl. fixed targeting systems and gun)
– mission fuel
– mission ordnance
Mission ordnance is subdivided into
– 1200 rounds of 30mmx113 ammo for the M230 Automatic Gun
– up to 76 (2.75 inch) Hydra-70 Folding-Fin Aerial Rockets in up to 4 nineteen tube M261 Light Weight Launchers, and
– up to 16 AGM-114 Hellfire anti-tank missiles plus racks.
A single loaded M261 Launcher weighs 493 – 660 lbs, depending on the specific type of rocket loaded.
A single AGM-114 Hellfire weighs 100 – 108 lbs depending on version.
A ADEN/DEFA 30X113 B HEI cartidge weighs 442-452 grams, with a projectile weight of 245 grams (i.e. approx 1 lbs per round)
MISSION LOAD OUT:
1200 rounds of 30mm ammo = 1200 lbs
AND
16 Hellfire = 1600-1728 lbs
OR
76 Hydra rockets in 4 19-round launchers = 1972-2640 lbs
OR
8 Hellfire + 38 rockets = 1786-2184 lbs
Estimated total weight of mission ordnance
at least: 1200+1600=2800 lbs (1270 kg)
at most: 1200+2640=3840 lbs (1740 kg)
In other words, about 1,5 tons of ordnance typically