All info you need on various MIG 29 versions in this context
Max weapons load of MiG-20SMT-I is 5 tons. For MiG-29SMT-II its 5,500 kg
MiG-29SMTK is a carrierborne variant believed to have been offered to India and China in association with initial efforts to sell carrier Admiral Gorshkov. It combines MiG-29SMT features with landing gear, carrier landing system, folding wing, double-slotted flaps, arrester hook and enlarged tailplane of MiG-29K, the original maritime version which was based on the MiG-29M structure.
What does the model have for CIWS? It does not look like 2x Kashtan. Is it a) 2×2 AK 630, or b) 2×1 Ak630 plus VL Barak?
The Asters being active radar guided and TVC are far more capable of dealing with stealthy/small/fastmover/low targets than the SM2 methinks despite the higher raw range of the SM2. arent they also faster than SM2?
Shouldn’t the comparison Aster 15 <> ESSM, Aster-30 <> SM2?
Yeah, LCF has a slot for one more MK41 but recent discussion of Tomahawk purchase for Dutch navy mentioned that adding this missile would reduce SAM load out, suggesting no 6th Mk41 will be added.
Oops, F100 does indeed have 6 Mk41 :rolleyes:
As for the Danish ships, 2 have troop carrying and support facilities but another 3 halfsisters are more like pure destroyers

See also http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=31557
LCF has 5 8-cell Mk 41. F-100 and F-124 have 4 8-cell Mk 41. Type 45 will have 6x 8-cell VLU, either Mk41 of Sylver or a mix. Horizon will have 6 8-cell Sylver VLU.
Terran’s point about ESSM applies to any of the Mk41 equipped ships that employ or will empoy a mix of ESSM/SM2/T-Lam, rather than Aster 15/30 plus some LACM.
Sev: navy source is fine, no problem with that, just wondered of any of this ever got published anywhere (esp. the helicopter going through the heli-deck).
BY THE WAY: should we add Norway’s Nansen class and Denmark’s large StanFlex ships to the list?
Alvaro de Bazan class
Nansen class
Zeven Provincien class
Sachsen class
As for APAR, a juicy remark on that. It was flawed in the beginning. When it first entered service, it was only tested with North Sea Water as a cooling system. Afterwards, it became clear that when they left to go out more South, they couldn’t cool the APAR, rendering it useless. They have now solved the problem I think (don’t know how though). Also, the first helicopter that landed on Zeven Provinciën sank through the helo deck. You can make mistakes, but mistakes this big???
What was the problem with cooling the APAR? Different coolant composition further south? Different coolant base temperature? What was the solution? I have not previously heard out the cooling problem, nor of the ZP’s helicopter deck succumbng under the weight of a helicopter. Do you have accessible sources for this and, if yes, what are they? You got my attention here.
From the start there has been a split between the operational requirements of UK, France and Italy and Spain, Germany and The Netherlands. The former countries formulated a requirement for a substantially larger and longer ranged vessel than the latter countries.
The Netherlands, Germany and Spain set up the Trilateral Frigate Agreement for the national construction of frigates. In addition to the LCF (De Zeven Provincien) built in The Netherlands, the F100 (Alvaro de Bazan) is being built in Spain by Izar and the F124 (Sachsen) is being built in Germany by ARGE F124 (Blohm and Voss, HDW and Thyssen Nordseewerke). The co-operation extends to the ship platform and not to the systems.
The original Horizon project was a three-nation initiative to build a new design of air defence ship including Italy, France and the UK. The UK government withdrew from the program in 1999. France and Italy signed a new Memorandum of Understanding in September 2000 confirming the joint development of the Horizon. The UK developed the Type 45.
Basic platform parameters
Length o.a. & waterline
F-100 Alvaro de Bazan: 146.70m, 133.2m
F-124 Sachsen: 143.00m, 132.15m
F-802 De Zeven Provinciën: 144.24m, 130.20m
Horizon: 150m, 141.7m
Type 45 Daring: 152.4m, 143.5m
Beam (o.a. & waterline)
F-100 Alvaro de Bazan: 18.6m
F-124 Sachsen: 17.44m, 16.68m
F-802 De Zeven Provinciën: 18.80m, 17.15m
Horizon: 20.3m, 15.6m
Type 45 Daring: 21.2m, 18m
Draft
F-100 Alvaro de Bazan: 4.84m
F-124 Sachsen: 7.0m
F-802 De Zeven Provinciën: 5.18m
Horizon: 5.1m
Type 45 Daring: 5.7m
Displacement (full load)
F-100 Alvaro de Bazan: 5,800t
F-124 Sachsen: 5,960t
F-802 De Zeven Provinciën: 6,050t
Horizon: 6,700+t
Type 45 Daring: 7,350t
Top speed (boost)
F-100 Alvaro de Bazan: 28.5 knots
F-124 Sachsen: 29 knots
F-802 De Zeven Provinciën: 30 knots
Horizon: 29 knots
Type 45 Daring: 29 knots
Range
F-100 Alvaro de Bazan: 4,500 nautical miles at 18 knots
F-124 Sachsen: 4,000 nautical miles at 18 knots
F-802 De Zeven Provinciën: 5,000 nautial miles at 18 knots
Horizon: 7,000 nautical miles at 18 knots
Type 45 Daring: 7,000 nautical miles at 18 knots
Propulsion system
F-100: CODAG (2x GE LM2500 GTU 34.8 MW + 2x Izar diesel 9 MW)
F-124:CODAG (1x GE 7 LM2500 GTU 23.5 MW, 2x MTU diesels 7.4 MW)
LCF: CODOG (2x RR Spey GTU 18.5 MW + 2x Stork-Wartsila diesel 8.4 MW)
Horizon: CODOG (2x GE LM2500 GTU 26.5 MW + 2x Pielstick diesel 8MW)
Type 45 Daring: Integrated Electric Propulsion (2x RR WR-21 21.5 MW + 2x Alstom electric induction motors 20M + 2x Wartsila diesels 2.2MW)
Crew
F-100 Alvaro de Bazan: 202 + 48
F-124 Sachsen: 230 + 13 (37+2 officers, 67+5 NCOs, 124+6 ratings)
LCF: 202 (32 officers, 47 NCOs, 123 ratings)
Horizon: 182 + 48
Type 45 Daring: 190 (20 officers, 170 ratings), 45-60 Marines (total max. 235)
I think these are to scale
Burke flight IIA (US)
Burke (US)
Type 45 (UK)
Horizon (FR/IT)
LCF/ADCF (NL)
F100 (ES)
Just because it’s a great shot: De Zeven Provinciën = The Seven Provinces (Dutch LCF)
Check the wake. She’s making a tight turn to starboard, that’s why she’s leaning over to port.
Smart-L is great, as is APAR
Looks like its in Den Helder. That’s the RNthNS Rotterdam LPD in the background.
Hmm, I think I’ve seen a picture of Sub-Harpoon inside Walrus (in KIJK, I know, very basic mag, but excellent pictures 😉 and interesting stories if you’re not interested in the real details )
That is entirely possible because the RNthN does practise with ’em. They just don’t own any :rolleyes:
Never heard of the Walrus.. i’m also interested in what kind of Torpedos they are armed with.. after all a weapons systems is only as good as it’s weapon right? 😉
They are an improved Dutch Zwaardvis class, of which the Taiwanese Hai Lung class is a variation.

The Zwaardvis class when built employed Honeywell Mk 37 mod2 plus the upgrades NT 37 C mod2 and NT 37 C/D/E. Later-on it also got Honeywell Mk 48 Mod 4. No SSM capability as built. 20 torpedoes carried
The modified Zwaardvis / Hai Lung class has AEG SUT, dual purpose, wire-guided, active/passive homing to 12 km (6.6 nm) at 35 kts, warhead 250 kg. These are manufactured under license in Indonesia. Provisions were made for carrying Feng 2 SSM’s but, like Walrus class, none are carried. 20 torpedoes
The Walrus class employs Honeywell Mk 48 Mod 4 and Mk 48 ADCAP. It can also fire Honeywell/Northrop (NT) 37 C/D/E (currently in reserve stock only). The class is “fitted for but not with” McDonnell Douglas Sub-Harpoon. 20 torpedoes or Sub-Harpoon. 40 mines in lieu of torpedoes.
“Holes”, “Triangles”. What about the Conning Tower Fins? The Lada, the Kilos none of them have the fins on the tower.
As I said, they too look a bit funny. Besides, the Lada/Amur class does have diving planes on the coning tower.
“Zulu’s, thousends of them”
…
These guys have too much time on their hands 😀