dark light

Wanshan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Australia to buy RFA Largs Bay #2005043
    Wanshan
    Participant

    This seems very unlikely. The point of buying her now is to get her into service quickly. Adding a permanent hangar would negate that, since it would mean major rebuilding, probably taking a couple of years. It would also compromise her functionality in her primary role (what she was bought for, in the long-term), i.e. sealift. The LHDs will have plenty of helicopter capacity.

    Who says it needs to be permanent? Plus I don’t think adding some hangarspace would be that major a ‘rebuild’. It might suffice to add 1 or 2 telescopic hangars. The point is not that there isn’t enough helicopter capability, but rather that this ship can operate independently of the LHDs with a pair of helicopters on board

    Just to give an impression:
    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3515/4077216897_f5762e5e88.jpg
    http://www.shipspotting.com/photos/middle/1/5/6/519651.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005224
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Thank you Wan,

    I was not able to find a single pic of the new Korsar frigate that is complete. The only pic I got was the one posted.

    I also had some basic questions which did not came with my last post.
    1) the VLS looks like 32-cell in 4x containers of 8-each. But is there any more to the SB side (?). I can’t see it properly.
    2) Is it just me or just an illusion of the A-190E turret being installed on an elevated base? It looks like too much height and the crew is going to have a good fall if stepped out carelessly.
    3) Does it have its exhaust just after the 2nd mast also?
    4) any specific reason why RuN did not consider the Korsar class frigate even though they had better sonar dome/sonar than the Krivak class.
    5) Is it probably because the SDB have more hold in the establishment than the ZDB?

    1) just 4x 8-round Klinok

    2) Sort of. Much like on Talwar class
    http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Articles/Images/Article13b.jpg

    3) Yes, 2 stacks, much like Neustrashimy
    http://img.blog.yahoo.co.kr/ybi/1/24/56/shinecommerce/folder/54/img_54_10124_6?1224594636.jpg

    4, 5) There’s Neustrashimy and Mudry (and a third unfinished hull). I suppose that, with 22350 being a development in the line Krivak I, II, III, Talwar, it is a matter of standardization, avoiding multiple, parallel ‘lines’.

    I really can’t understand what the need was there for them to come up with an entirely new design like the 22350 when the full potential of the Krivak class has not yet been exhausted.

    Copmpletely new design? If you compare the line drawings, the descendancy from Krivak I, II, III, Talwar is quite obvious.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2005276
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Iran mounts missiles on hovercrafts

    Is nothing new IIRC.

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_okE2fz_Pef8/SGCrWZI6qzI/AAAAAAAAAnU/iEw7NAhvkm0/s400/hovercraft.jpg

    http://www.shahyad.net/iiarmy/Navy/Hovercraft/BH7-MK5-103-1.jpg

    The Navy has successfully test-fired a range of powerful missiles mounted with laser technology, which display high precision and have a range of 45 km (28 miles) to 300 km (186 miles).

    i.e. the Chinese YJ-8 (C-801) through YJ-83 (C-803) series of SSMs and maybe C-701 too.

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2005296
    Wanshan
    Participant

    It does appear that you would be very surprised then. From what I can tell these OPV’s were Thai-designed, with project consultation from a number of sources, and originally intended to be built locally. Hudong was able to offer a build price cheaper than local industry, so, it got the build contracts in 2002.

    I wonder how much the fact that the F-22P contract was knocking about allowed the Hudong yard to offer such an attractive unit cost…..certainly a happy coincidence there!.

    This (Thai-Chinese-third party set up) apparently is also the case with missile boats currenty on order for Bangladesh navy, a version of which will also be built in Pakistan.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2005482
    Wanshan
    Participant
    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2005580
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Indian Navy to Procure South Korean Minesweepers

    ROK and US sourced ships both based on the Italian De Lerici class MHC design.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2005657
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Do we really know how the 956s boilers have performed in China though? They certainly have a poor record compared to 1155s in Russia.

    As do most steam plants when compared to more modern GTU plants …. ? But the question was not about relative performance of GTU versus steam, but about flaws in the steam plant.

    How do we know anything about the performance of any Chinese ship these day?

    Is it the case that most Sovremennys have had a boiler fire or explosion during their lifetime? If not, then what is the difference with the plant in Moskva’s, Kievs and Kuz that makes for problems? They’ve all suffered neglect during the final stages of the Soviet Union.

    One indicator may be whether the Chinese Sovr’s (bot flavors) are seen as being mostly active or mostly moored. Another indicator would be their participation in port visits abroad. And then there’s out of area deployment.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2005667
    Wanshan
    Participant

    JanGoBo, I don’t even know why we are arguing now. You can have the last word on the matter. I, for one, am sufficiently convinced and see no need to dispute such technicalities.

    As for the matter of the boilers, we’ll just have to see. Every Soviet aircraft carrier including even the Kuznetsov has had at least one major boiler fire and near-chronic problems with the KVG boilers, and as such it seems natural for me that the Vikramaditya isn’t going to be problem-free, regardless of training and maintenance. But like I said, we’ll just have to wait and see.:)

    Interesting, but how has the record been for e.g. the Sovremenny’s, which iirc use the same turbine and boilers, just in a smaller plant (Main propulsion include four KVG-3 high-pressure steam boilers, 50,000hp TV-12-4 steam turbines, driving two fixed pitch propellers.)http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/surface/sovremenny.asp

    Taking the chinese sovremenny’s as example, with proper care they appear to function without problems. How do you explain that if there indeed is something inherently flawed with the equipment.

    in reply to: Indian Navy – News & Discussion – IV #2005676
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Brahmos on Teg
    http://foto.rg.ru/gall/465cd33e

    Thx, interesting pics.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005708
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Korsar is export version of 11540

    One of several versions.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005764
    Wanshan
    Participant

    If anyone got anymore pictures of these two models, can you please post it? I could’t find much on these.

    Had this drawing of Korsar

    Also, check: http://spkb.air.spb.ru/en/news/news/2010/11/12/evronaval/

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005776
    Wanshan
    Participant

    If anyone got anymore pictures of these two models, can you please post it? I could’t find much on these.

    Only one I could finc on 22160 (from Euronaval 2010 exhibition)
    http://spkb.air.spb.ru/news/news/2010/11/12/evronaval/1.jpg

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2005879
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Bulgarian Navy to Modernise Frigates by 2014

    Three ships, eh. Must be the ex-Belgian Wielingen ships. The only way to fit a heli-pad would be to remove/relocate the Mk29 Sea Sparrow launcher and maybe also the MM38s. Should prove interesting.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2005965
    Wanshan
    Participant

    FFX: Korea’s New Frigates

    The ROKN’s 9 small 2,200 – 2,300 ton Ulsan Class frigates were built in South Korea, and commissioned from 1981-1993. They are not designed to operate alone in high-threat areas, or to provide general fleet defense on the open seas. Instead, they are designed to serve as high-end coastal patrol vessels with a mix of anti-air (RIM-7 Sea Sparrow), anti-ship (guns, RGM-84 Harpoon), and anti-submarine capabilities. They carry a crew of 150.

    Nah, I don’t think so.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -III #2006098
    Wanshan
    Participant

    US Navy Uses Laser to Cripple Ship in First Sea Test

    “Northrop Grumman and the U.S. Navy hope to use similar lasers against small aerial targets and unarmored boats in the near future.”

    i.e. as ‘bug swatter’ against air or seaborn ‘swarm attacks’

Viewing 15 posts - 736 through 750 (of 3,544 total)