It scares me that some of you lot are even allowed anywhere near an aircraft. Look from posting #82 (page 3) on the Obviously named thread, “How about a forum Fly-in in 2006?”.
Does that help you out at all? No?
LEICESTER FEBRUARY 26th 2006
Do you need help booking a spamcan too?
Actually I was going to bring 2 Yak 52’s but given your attitude I don’t think I’ll bother. I was refering to the least experienced pilots on the forum.
How much experience do you have by the way? or are you one of these 100 hour sprog who think they are a bit of an ace?
I am generally a great believer in self help, but I will give you a clue. Check the bottom of the thread with the obvious name…
No more help!
All I can find is some obscure remark about Leicester with no date on it. Given that a lot of pilots here will have to pre-book aircraft maybe it would be more sensible to announce a date for this forum fly-in instead of being cryptic?
DB, you up for a three ship air to air next weekend?
We shall see… The date and venue have been picked.
What/where is it?
Depends where but I’d be up for it, could also come along with anywhere between 2 and 4 other aircraft.
Did anyone come up with a date/venue?
Interesting Mr Mog and DB,
Maybe a compromise can be reached between the club and the locals? I can see the point that the locals would be a bit p***ed off with the increase in movements and maybe the based aircraft could climb straight out and return straight in. Training circuits could be flown at Beccles which doesn’t suffer from Nimbyitis quite so much.
I’m not surprised you took exception to a letter like that DB, new kids on the block etc. IMHO the C150 is probably likely to attract more complaints than an S’man because of the different tone. The 150 is more ‘whiney’, and I’m not getting at 150’s either as I own one! I don’t think a flying club would write a letter like that either, at least I hope not. I suspect that it was probably written by a keen but misguided individual, probably a low houred PPL. You know the sort a typical sprog who thinks he’s a bit of an ace and knows it all.
Lets hope it isn’t too late to reach an agreement that everyone, GA and the locals, can live with. After all Suffolk isn’t over endowed with club airfields nowadays is it?
Scope there for an interesting discussion on the word ‘known’
Yes, but I believe it to mean people known to the pilot before the flight and not met because of but we are probably being caught up in minor points here and its probably not that important.
Indeed they could and probably would.
But as I seem to keep repeating, the ‘advertising’ here is BY willing ballast, not FOR willing ballast.
Moggy
No need to shout, I still stand by my previous post, the spirit of the rule is that cost share is by members of a flying club or people known to the pilot not anyone who wants to advertise themselves as passengers, and before you say they are only paying for the landing fee and lunch not cost sharing, Moggy, the lunch and landing fee would probably be said to be ‘valuable consideration’.
More people are killed annually by donkeys than die in air crashes.
Only if your pilot happens to be an Ass
More people are killed annually by donkeys than die in air crashes.
Only if your pilot happens to be an Ass
Dear me BR, read the thread.
There are no flights advertised here, merely willing ballast.
Moggy
ANO says,
no information concerning the flight shall have been published or advertised prior to the commencement of the flight other than, in the case of an aircraft operated by a flying club, advertising wholly within the premises of such a flying club in which case all the persons carried on such a flight who are aged 18 years or over shall be members of that flying club;
I would hazard a guess that the CAA could interpret advertising for ‘willing ballast’ as information concerning the flight.
Another Auster fan?
Depends, might have been him cut it out! :diablo:
The rasp that you hear from Stearman and Harvard/Texan aircraft is the propellor tips reaching the speed of sound…
Aerodynaically speaking the Bee should not fly..
Incorrect, the rasp heard from a certain Stearman is caused by its pilot after another marathon at McDonalds, eh DB?
The rasp that you hear from Stearman and Harvard/Texan aircraft is the propellor tips reaching the speed of sound…
Aerodynaically speaking the Bee should not fly..
Incorrect, the rasp heard from a certain Stearman is caused by its pilot after another marathon at McDonalds, eh DB?
Sturgate has a Breakfast patrol on the 5th of Feb, free landings and a free breakfast if you get to the overhead without being spotted.
Look at the areas around and be careful, remember 313!!!!
Can you post more details please? i.e times of contest etc. I’ve tried to ring Lincoln Aero Club but couldn’t get an answer.
Only the overhead? surely not, when we went to one at Headcorn a few years ago they had turbulents nabbing people in the circuit, even on final, a bit unsporting I felt.