> Putting high tension power cables along hill ridge lines is a great way to bring
> down missiles
better is surround the target with 100m light telescoping poles with steel nets stretched between them. roadside bandits in india often use fishing nets strung at night to bring down unwary motorcyle riders on darkened roads. use the same strategy.
this cuts out low level approach, leaving a cone which can be covered by a single good AD missile-gun system like pantsyr supplemented by a Tor 🙂
imo considering the euros will get their chance in JSF feeding trough after usaf and usn have satiated their huge appetities …something like 2020 perhaps…its better they invest in Neuron UCAVs packs of them controlled from 2 seater rafale/ef/gripen and functioning as unmanned radar sentry’s and AAM shooters.
15 yrs should be enough time to get this right. most of the subsystems to fit inside the airframe already exist in the pool of EU cos RR, dassault, snecma, thales, sagem, sextant, Bae, saab, mtu, eads, alenia….
the days of free meals and security underwritten by Unkil are over. power needs investment, EU needs to invest internally rather than pan-handle outside Unkils saloon.
Janes.
Elta AESA is flying
Bill Sweetman, IDR Technology & Aerospace Editor
Singapore
Israel Aircraft Industries’ Elta subsidiary is testing a prototype of a fighter radar with an active electronically scanned array (AESA). The first flight took place earlier this year in Elta’s Boeing 737 testbed. The company says that it is ready to take orders for the new radar and that it could be delivered within 18 months of an order.
Designated EL/M-2052, the AESA radar is designed either for new-production applications or as a retrofit for the company’s in-service EL/M-2032-series radars, some 400 of which are in service worldwide. As an upgrade, the radar would replace the old antenna and transmitter and use the existing power supply and radar processor.
One unusual feature is that the array comprises ‘bricks’ of 24 transmit-receiver modules, making it easy to assemble the AESA in different configurations to match the size and shape of an existing fighter nose. Smaller, lower-module-count versions can be air-cooled, reducing weight and making integration simpler.
looks like used seakings are also on menu. how do the USN seakings differ from the RN version ? I guess it doesnt matter since the trenton needs a large utility helo only.
http://www.dcmilitary.com/navy/tester/11_09/national_news/39959-1.html
March 02, 2006
Indian military attaché scouts Navy aircraft for purchase
Photos by Bryan Jaffe
The Indian military officials and Capt. Mark Stone board the H-3. During the flight, both Murugesan and Jolly were given the opportunity to take the controls of the aircraft to get first-hand knowledge of its capabilities.
Two high ranking members of the Indian military came here Feb. 22, for briefings on the capabilities of the H-3 Sea King for possible purchase from the U.S. Navy.
Air Commodore Rakesh K. Jolly, Air Attaché and Commodore Parasurama Muragesan, Naval Attaché, were shown the Sea King capabilities during a briefing, followed by a hands-on flight demonstration with Capt. Mark Stone, program manager of the Commercial Derivative and Support Aircraft Program Office, PMA-207.
The Sea Kings would be used to outfit the USS Trenton (LPD 14), a decommissioned amphibious transport dock the Indian military is planning to purchase from the U.S. Navy within the next 12 months. The plan is for the Indian military to acquire six H-3 aircraft for the ship.
The H-3 Sea King is a twin engine helicopter designed to fly in all weather conditions. There are several variants, including the SH-3H, used by the Navy Reserves for detection, tracking, classification and destruction of enemy submarines.
The Sea King was commissioned more than four decades ago, and has been replaced by the SH-60F Sea Hawk as the primary anti-submarine helicopter.
In addition to scouting the H-3 Sea Kings, the Indian dignitaries showed interest in MH-60R Sea Hawks, F/A-18 Super Hornets and P-3 Orions.
the new ones will be used as trainers.
Sameer, except brahmos russia has also happily sold the same stuff to PRC, so the French are certainly not unique. people will get away with whatever they can get away with – if the situation is such that both sides have to buy.
methinks of mixed buy of F16mki and Mig35 is eventual choice. Mig35 with the El2052 ofcourse and python6.
the new “Munna” :p

an alliance between #1 and #3 against #2 usually happens by logic. suppose 100 coins are to be distributed and #1 proposes first the shares. if the other two vote against him #1 loses and gets eaten. if #1 gets eaten, #2 can outmuscle #3 and take all 100 coins.
So #1 proposes 99 coins for himself, 0 coins for #2 and 1 coin for #3 :diablo:
search for “five pirates problem” in google.
thats also a very possible outcome.
Israel has installed Elisra and rafael ECM eqpt & avionics on their fighters havent they ? I assume India would also insist that similar local or israeli kit be fitted. the weapons would obviously be a mix of american and israeli only which is perfectly adequate. a simple clause would have raytheon integrate the astra aam later.
it is well understood that US deals do not involve much transfer of tech or flexibility in installing 3rd party gear, so I expect the deal to be split with another contender.
F16-block52-mki would be very cost effective choice compared to Rafale though the french plane has better raw performance and upg potential.
:diablo:
CNN has no clue what they are talking about. the F16 and F18 offers have been on table for sometime now. whats unclear – is APG79 on the table after export clearance ? the upcoming RFP will specify a AESA radar from the start as a essential req. there is Air Intl article with more details . Elta might team with mikoyan to offer el2052 on mig35.
tribal pathans have been known to shoot the whiskers off a single fly sleeping on a buffalo’s back at 21km range using their long barreled rifles.
dont worry, the last of this noble breed is still living in indian hands and will soldier on atleast until 2010.
what is the slowest speed of a Su27 ? the problem is similar to driving a car at X kmph through a hole which is 2x the car’s width. it gets more difficult as the X increases but racing drivers comfortably manage at 250kmph to maintain such “lane discipline”.
nobody is claiming to fly at 600kmph thru this hole. imo they will do this comfortably enough.
I believe the chase ac is never M2K, more like jaguar or Mig21.
can always be relied on for the “unofficial pix” 🙂