dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hitler's Secret Bomber #1158134
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Don’t-cha love the exaggerated hype these shows give such things?

    That glider-towed “testing” was just the first phase of flight testing… and they likely would have lost a few aircraft early on to one of the problem that caused the cancellation of the YB-49.

    Basically, the overall length was too short, and pitch changes could get out of control fairly easily. Towing it would have camouflaged that aspect.

    Additionally, it tended to “hunt” back and forth in yaw for extended periods after turns and in disturbed air… and the YB-49 had small vertical fins that provided some yaw control… the Horten had none. Towing would also hide this issue.

    in reply to: Lockheed after the war #1154406
    Bager1968
    Participant

    While the Lockheed plant was at Burbank airport then, there was more at the airport than just Lockheed… and I suspect those shots are of some of that “more”, as well as Lockheed.

    After all, 3 PV2 Neptunes in one place at that time indicates they just came off the assembly line, as might the Connies, but the P-51s indicate a USAF, USAFR, or ANG outfit.

    That Corsair looks awfully like a racing ship, and the lack of F-80/T-33/F-94 jet fighters indicates it isn’t Lockheed’s flightline.

    in reply to: Interesting training hulk. #1136059
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Wiki has a nice photo of a F9F-8T (redesignated TF-9J 1962) on USS Saratoga CV-60 sometime between 1957 & 1959.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e0/F9F-8T_on_USS_Saratoga_CVA-60.jpg/771px-F9F-8T_on_USS_Saratoga_CVA-60.jpg

    larger version:
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e0/F9F-8T_on_USS_Saratoga_CVA-60.jpg

    in reply to: Wild Weasels!! (2002 Thread!!) #1128084
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I’m curious too, couldn’t see the photos either :how (or maybe why) was this resurrected? Brian S.:confused:

    The “thread necromancer” responsible has exactly 2 posts in the 19 months since he joined this forum… one in August 2008 re-activating a 4-month dormant thread to list a book directly relevant to the thread discussion (books about Beaufighters)… and this one, re-animating a 7-year moribund thread to list a book relating to the thread subject…

    Seems to be a pattern… albeit a very sporadic & sparse one.

    in reply to: USS Midway Future Aircraft? #1125018
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Are they trying to get more?

    HUP, 2, 3, 4…

    I’ll get me coat

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/HUP_Patuxent_River_water_landing_NAN9-58.jpg

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c6/HUP_DD-701_1958.jpg

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/HUP-2_HU-1_USS_Los_Angeles_CA-135_NAN3-57.jpg

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/HUP3-01A.JPG

    in reply to: Boeing Stratocruiser Landing Attitude #1125021
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I liked the animated “Sovereign Airways” vids.

    in reply to: Invent the carrier's angled flight deck in 1940 #1121790
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Modifications to the US Essex class carriers (17 completed before V-J Day, and 7 after) for an angled deck were simple and easily done.

    Also note the Essex class had 2 x H-4 or H-6 hydraulic catapults. These were replaced in the post-war upgrades by either H-8 or C-11-1 (steam) catapults.

    Look at this drawing of CV-36 USS Antietam, the US prototype angled-deck carrier, and compare it to an un-modified Essex (CV-36 was a “second group” ship, with 2 quad 40mm mounts on the bow, therefore the bow was longer than the “first group” with the single bow quad 40mm mount in the second illustration).

    The CV-36 drawing keeps a line showing the old flight deck outline.

    http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b336/Bager1968/Carriers/USN%20Midway%20and%20Essex%20CV/USSAntietam1954.jpg

    http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b336/Bager1968/Carriers/USN%20Midway%20and%20Essex%20CV/essex_drawing.jpg

    in reply to: Corsair Pictures #1121794
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Interesting, Anna.

    I’m guessing that bird was one of the 95 Corsair Is?
    Or is it a non-RN bird “in drag”?

    All of the 510 Corsair IIs, 430 Corsair IIIs, & 977 Corsair IVs had the “clipped tips” as shown here:

    http://farm1.static.flickr.com/85/215408634_34896ad87f_o.jpg

    in reply to: Corsair Pictures #1119367
    Bager1968
    Participant

    In for a penny, in for a pound…

    Ling-Temco-Vought A-7E Corsair II:
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/A-7E_Corsair_II.JPEG/800px-A-7E_Corsair_II.JPEG

    in reply to: Corsair Pictures #1119392
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Two can play at that game!

    ‘Corsair’ (Noun) – Pirate, privateer, Buccaneer….

    ….I’ll get my coat…;) Brian S.

    You asked for it…
    Consolidated PB4Y-2 Privateer:
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b4/PB4Y-2_Privateer_in_flight.jpg

    Vought F6U Pirate:
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1a/F6U_NAN1-48.jpg

    in reply to: Nanchang CJ-6A crash in USA #1117095
    Bager1968
    Participant

    “WW2 aircraft”….

    Role: Trainer/Light attack
    Manufacturer: China Nanchang Aircraft Manufacturing Corporation
    First flight: August 27, 1958
    Introduced: 1960
    Status: Operational
    Primary user: Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force
    Number built: 2,000+

    A common, but erroneous, belief is that the CJ-6 is a Chinese version of the Yakovlev Yak-18A. Its predecessor, the Nanchang CJ-5, was a licence-built version of the Yak-18. However, advancements in pilot training brought a need for a new aircraft with improved performance and a tricycle landing gear. When the Soviet Union developed the Yak-18A, PLAAF engineers decided that its performance and design would not suit China’s needs.

    During late 1957 Aeronautical Engineers Bushi Cheng and Lin Jiahua began work in Shenyang on a trainer design that addressed the shortcomings of the Yak-18A. The design they delivered featured an aluminum semi-monocoque fuselage, flush-riveted throughout, and introduced a modified Clark airfoil wing design with pronounced dihedral in the outer sections. Wind tunnel testing validated the design, and in May 1958 the program was transferred to the Nanchang Aircraft Manufacturing factory where Chief Engineer Goa Zhenning initiated production of the CJ-6. The first flight of the CJ-6 was completed on August 27, 1958 by Lu Maofan and He Yinxi.

    in reply to: Heroism in the face of adversity. #1115729
    Bager1968
    Participant

    May 9th 1981 at Hill AFB, Utah when Captain David “Nick” Hauck from Mingo Jct, Ohio flying Thunderbird 6 crashed while attempting to land his ailing T-38 after an engine malfunctioned and caught fire.

    With black smoke bellowing from the exhaust and the aircraft losing altitude in a high nose-up angle of attack the safety officer on the ground radioed Capt Hauck; “You’re on fire, punch out” to which he responded; “Hang on… we have a bunch of people down there”, the aircraft continued to fight to stay airborne for about ½ a mile before hitting a large oak tree and a barn, then sliding across a field and flipping as it traversed an irrigation canal ultimately erupting into a fireball just a few hundred feet from the runways end.

    No one on the ground was injured even though the wreck occurred adjacent a roadway packed with onlookers.

    The road, Utah highway 193, crosses the flight path just outside the perimeter fence, approx 1/4 mile from the end of the runway. Police had cleared spectators from the roadside just a half hour earlier, but a number of vehicles had again stopped directly under the flight path. The T-38 likely would have impacted near or on those vehicles had Cpt. Hauk ejected late, and it would have dropped into a housing subdivision had he ejected immediately.

    He found the largest field in the area to put it down in.

    I was there that day… 25 days before I reported for transport to USMC boot camp.

    (Note, the Wiki article has a false entry for this accident, which is completely contrary to the USAF accident findings and the recordings of the Safety Officer – Tbird-6 exchange cited above.)

    in reply to: The vanishing F-94 Starfire. #1114019
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Or a 20-year-old spotty memory mixed with UFO “wanna-be-itis”.

    in reply to: Name the part #1114021
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I acquired it purely because it looks interesting (I like buttons!) – it’ll be even more interesting when I know what it is!

    many thanks,

    Timbo

    Ooo, what does this button do?

    😀

    in reply to: Skyraider #1111084
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Ah thanks Peter,i need a decent book on aircraft! (I have the Observer’s Book of aircraft coming soon which will help!)

    Far more info can be found here (detailed model-by-model descriptions & specifications, along with type service history and airframe number lists)… but no photos or drawings:

    http://home.att.net/~jbaugher4/newa1.html

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 3,360 total)