dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,296 through 2,310 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: No Short and Harland Ltd #1175764
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Having gone back and looked at what I have on the British proposed/cancelled jet transports/airliners of the 1950s, I find the following statement:
    “Handley Page tried again in 1958 with the revised HP.111, this featured a new ‘widebody’ fuselage of circular section and was proposed to the RAF as a strategic transport and to BOAC as a 200 passenger medium range or 150 passenger transatlantic transport and civil freighter. In this form it was actually selected by the RAF but politics intervened and the Govt insisted the order went to the Short Belfast and HP never offered a large transport again.”.

    So you are absolutely correct, PNM1. My only question is… what was the planned cargo payload of the HP111? Could it have carried the floor weight/item size that the Belfast did?

    http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b336/Bager1968/Aircraft/Cargo-Transport/HP111.jpg

    in reply to: Chinese to build two 50-60,000 ton Carriers #2051652
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Hmmm… Japanese newspaper quoting unidentified “military and shipbuilding sources”.

    I’ll wait to see the formal confirmation from one of the concerned governments (China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, USA…) before believing it is actually proceeding.

    Yes, we have done lots of speculating, and there are definite indicators that this is the direction China is going… but the unnamed sources might well be mistaken as to the timing (and other details).

    in reply to: USMC AV-8B down #2051666
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Crap!!!

    in reply to: Avro Vulcan vs. Boeing B-47 Stratojet for RAAF 1959? #2449910
    Bager1968
    Participant

    V-Bombers vs B-47

    The “V” bombers were in a similar weight class as the B-47, but the Vulcan and Victor carried nearly the bomb-load of the B-52.

    Type: B-47E; Function: bomber; Year in service: 1951; Crew: 3; Engines: 6 * 3,266kg G.E. J47-GE-25
    Wing Span: 35.36m; Length: 33.48m; Height: 8.51m; Wing Area: 132.66m2
    Empty Weight: 36,630kg; Max.Weight: 89,893kg
    Speed: 975km/h; Ceiling: 12,350m; Range: 6,440km
    Armament: 2*g20mm, 9,072kg

    Type: Valiant B Mk.1; Function: bomber; Year: 1955; Crew: 5; Engines: 4 * 4,535kg R.R. Avon 201
    Wing Span: 34.85m; Length: 32.99m; Height: 9.80m; Wing Area: 219.43m2
    Empty Weight: 34,419kg; Max.Weight: 63,503kg
    Speed: 912km/h; Ceiling: 16,460m; Range: 7,420km
    Armament: 9,525kg

    Type: Victor B Mk.2; Function: bomber; Year: 1961; Crew: 5; Engines: 4 * 7,830kg R.R. Conway RCo.11
    Wing Span: 36.48m; Length: 35.03m; Height: 8.57m; Wing Area: 223.52m2
    Empty Weight: 41,277kg; Max.Weight: 105,687kg
    Speed: M0.95; Ceiling: 18,300m; Range: 3,700km (B Mk.1 2,400 km)
    Armament: 15,875kg

    Type: Vulcan B Mk.2; Function: bomber; Year: 1960; Crew: 5; Engines: 4 * 9,980kg B.S. Olympus 301
    Wing Span: 33.83m; Length: 32.15m; Height: Wing Area:
    Empty Weight: Max.Weight: 113,400kg
    Speed: 1,030km/h; Ceiling: 19,800m Range: 7,640km
    Armament: 21,454kg

    Type: B-52D; Function: bomber; Year: 1956; Crew: 6; Engines: 8 * P&W J57-P-29WA
    Wing Span: 56.39m; Length: 47.73m; Height: 14.72m; Wing Area: 371.60m2
    Empty Weight: 85,730kg; Max.Weight: 204,120kg
    Speed: Ceiling: Range: 11,860km
    Armament: 4*mg12.7mm, 108 bombs (500lb GP)[54,000 lb {24,545 kg}]

    Type: B-52H; Function: bomber; Year: 1960; Crew: 6; Engines: 8 * 75.6kN P&W TF-33-P-3
    Wing Span: 56.39m; Length: 49.05m; Height: 12.40m; Wing Area: 371.60m2
    Empty Weight: Max.Weight: +221,353kg
    Speed: 957km/h; Ceiling: 16,765m; Range: 16,093km
    Armament: 1*g20mm, 22,680kg (20*msl AGM-69 SRAM)

    The B-47 was directly comparable to Valiant B mk1. The low-level-optimized Valiant B mk2 first flew in 1953, and was canceled in 1955… given the mission’s start date of 1954, the best “medium-bomber” option for the RAAF was to order a batch of the Valiant B mk2… and demand the UK government allow Vickers to build them… as well as 12 V1000s… 4 in tanker config & 8 in transport config.

    in reply to: Avro Vulcan vs. Boeing B-47 Stratojet for RAAF 1959? #2454485
    Bager1968
    Participant

    V-Bombers vs B-47

    The “V” bombers were in a similar weight class as the B-47, but the Vulcan and Victor carried nearly the bomb-load of the B-52.

    Type: B-47E; Function: bomber; Year in service: 1951; Crew: 3; Engines: 6 * 3,266kg G.E. J47-GE-25
    Wing Span: 35.36m; Length: 33.48m; Height: 8.51m; Wing Area: 132.66m2
    Empty Weight: 36,630kg; Max.Weight: 89,893kg
    Speed: 975km/h; Ceiling: 12,350m; Range: 6,440km
    Armament: 2*g20mm, 9,072kg

    Type: Valiant B Mk.1; Function: bomber; Year: 1955; Crew: 5; Engines: 4 * 4,535kg R.R. Avon 201
    Wing Span: 34.85m; Length: 32.99m; Height: 9.80m; Wing Area: 219.43m2
    Empty Weight: 34,419kg; Max.Weight: 63,503kg
    Speed: 912km/h; Ceiling: 16,460m; Range: 7,420km
    Armament: 9,525kg

    Type: Victor B Mk.2; Function: bomber; Year: 1961; Crew: 5; Engines: 4 * 7,830kg R.R. Conway RCo.11
    Wing Span: 36.48m; Length: 35.03m; Height: 8.57m; Wing Area: 223.52m2
    Empty Weight: 41,277kg; Max.Weight: 105,687kg
    Speed: M0.95; Ceiling: 18,300m; Range: 3,700km (B Mk.1 2,400 km)
    Armament: 15,875kg

    Type: Vulcan B Mk.2; Function: bomber; Year: 1960; Crew: 5; Engines: 4 * 9,980kg B.S. Olympus 301
    Wing Span: 33.83m; Length: 32.15m; Height: Wing Area:
    Empty Weight: Max.Weight: 113,400kg
    Speed: 1,030km/h; Ceiling: 19,800m Range: 7,640km
    Armament: 21,454kg

    Type: B-52D; Function: bomber; Year: 1956; Crew: 6; Engines: 8 * P&W J57-P-29WA
    Wing Span: 56.39m; Length: 47.73m; Height: 14.72m; Wing Area: 371.60m2
    Empty Weight: 85,730kg; Max.Weight: 204,120kg
    Speed: Ceiling: Range: 11,860km
    Armament: 4*mg12.7mm, 108 bombs (500lb GP)[54,000 lb {24,545 kg}]

    Type: B-52H; Function: bomber; Year: 1960; Crew: 6; Engines: 8 * 75.6kN P&W TF-33-P-3
    Wing Span: 56.39m; Length: 49.05m; Height: 12.40m; Wing Area: 371.60m2
    Empty Weight: Max.Weight: +221,353kg
    Speed: 957km/h; Ceiling: 16,765m; Range: 16,093km
    Armament: 1*g20mm, 22,680kg (20*msl AGM-69 SRAM)

    The B-47 was directly comparable to Valiant B mk1. The low-level-optimized Valiant B mk2 first flew in 1953, and was canceled in 1955… given the mission’s start date of 1954, the best “medium-bomber” option for the RAAF was to order a batch of the Valiant B mk2… and demand the UK government allow Vickers to build them… as well as 12 V1000s… 4 in tanker config & 8 in transport config.

    in reply to: F/A-18G Growler #2449916
    Bager1968
    Participant

    100 F-35A; 24 F/A-18F

    124 new aircraft.

    in reply to: F/A-18G Growler #2454489
    Bager1968
    Participant

    100 F-35A; 24 F/A-18F

    124 new aircraft.

    in reply to: No Short and Harland Ltd #1177088
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The contract to design & build the Belfast is given to Bristol, for one.

    in reply to: France confirms 3rd Mistral-class #2051720
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Or perhaps they don’t want the only large shipbuilding facility in the UK to become the only large shipbuilding facility in Ireland?

    Re-approachment/semi-unification talks seem to be on-going… and I really don’t think they will end with the Republic of Ireland re-joining the UK, now do you?

    in reply to: Twin boom cargo aircraft #1180030
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The Belfast had huge problems with drag due to its more conventional shape, after all.

    Until, halfway through the “production run” they fitted a reshaped tail fairing, which raised the cruising speed by 40 mph. This went on all 5 aircraft already built and the 5 still building.

    in reply to: Tornadoes Over Pakistan?? #2458206
    Bager1968
    Participant

    There are three primary versions of the Tornado;
    IDS (Interdictor/Strike) fighter-bomber,
    ADV (Air Defence Variant) interceptor, and
    ECR (Electronic Combat/ Reconnaissance) suppression of enemy air defences (SEAD) aircraft.

    Only Germany & Italy operate the ECR. The German aircraft were new-build, and have had their recon equipment removed, while the Italian were converted from IDS airframes, and never had the recon gear installed.

    Bager1968
    Participant

    I would think, that if you had read what you posted before posting it, that this part just might have raised questions??

    Pakistan shelters and helps supply the rebels, who are seeking to overthrow the Soviet-backed Communist Government in Kabul and expel more than 100,000 Soviet troops.

    I know my first thought was “Why didn’t the poster mention this was old news?

    in reply to: General Discussion #298919
    Bager1968
    Participant

    http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/publications/bulletins/december_2008/dh82a_tiger_moth__g_ahvv.cfm

    Real accident… emergency landing, debris in the carburettor caused loss of power on take-off.

    in reply to: Be careful when you land… #1888010
    Bager1968
    Participant

    http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/publications/bulletins/december_2008/dh82a_tiger_moth__g_ahvv.cfm

    Real accident… emergency landing, debris in the carburettor caused loss of power on take-off.

    in reply to: The RAF should be ashamed…….. #2052667
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The Greenies (dry and wet) like to sit back and hope for the spoils of the blue bust up…but they have not been afraid to join in the fun.

    Except that the word coming out is that the ARF (sorry, RAF 😉 ) is also going after ALL of the Army’s helicopters as well!

    The RAF motto seems to have become “If it flies, it is ours”.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,296 through 2,310 (of 3,360 total)