Nothing in Korea?
Purely a RN/Commonwealth show?
The first of 703 production A-10s performed its initial flight in October 1975, #100 was delivered to the USAF in April 1978, and the last was delivered to the USAF in 1984.
Not bad at all.
http://www.vectorsite.net/ava10.html
“[Arthur Dent] learned to communicate with birds and discovered that their conversation was fantastically boring. It was all to do with wind speed, wingspans, power-to-weight ratios, and a fair bit about berries.”
— from LIFE, THE UNIVERSE, AND EVERYTHING by Douglas Adams
“Postponed a decision”, not cancelled. Yet.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice
:diablo:
The RAF has to be pleased. Through a fix price contract with Airbus all possible delays will be costly for Airbus. The British are used, that during their normal procurements, the price of military items will double. One of such examples maybe the F-35B and the related CVs in the future. 😉
DefenseNews: EADS May Freeze A400M Production for 7 Countries
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3734593&c=EUR&s=AIR
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE
BERLIN – Aerospace giant EADS has threatened to freeze production of its Airbus subsidiary’s flagship military airlifter if clients do not drop penalty clauses for late delivery, a German news report said Sept. 20.
Der Spiegel weekly, trailing its Sept. 22 publication, cited a letter sent by Louis Gallois, the French chief executive of both companies, to the governments of seven countries who have ordered the A400M plane.
In the letter, Gallois is quoted as saying the military carrier is “a heavy lossmaker” that is creating “considerable difficulties” at EADS, weighing down on the group’s financial performance.
The “anticipated profits” from 180 orders on Airbus’ books have already been “invested,” with Gallois adding in the letter that the present position could become “untenable” within months unless a deal is agreed that “keeps everyone happy.”
EADS wants clients to waive their contractual right to reductions in their bills due to late delivery, but Der Spiegel said Germany’s defense ministry would be “standing firm,” and Berlin is of the view that “financial concessions” should only be discussed upon receipt of the planes.
Business daily Financial Times Deutschland also reported this week that Gallois sent a letter pleading for “understanding” on the A400M.
Last week, Gallois said the plane’s first flight would take place “before the end of the year,” but the French press reported soon afterward that costs had risen astronomically and that the first flight was being put back to 2009.
Germany has ordered 60 A400Ms, making it the biggest customer.
Airbus has been struggling with four important delay announcements having been made since 2006 on delivery of its A380 superjumbo civil airliners.
Bolivia still has (as of one year ago) 16 fully-modernized (glass cockpit) T-33s in service… and not just as trainers, either.
No, they are the primary combat aircraft of the Bolivian Air Force.*
See this thread:
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=74944
*http://www.aeroflight.co.uk/waf/americas/bolivia/Bolivia-af_current_inventory.htm
Another “little” comparison:
My first flight was in a Air National Guard UH-1 in 1978 (I was 16). “Public Open House Day” flights for the public.
Next was also in High School, during a field trip to the US Army’s Dugway Proving Grounds in western Utah. Also a UH-1… this time Army. This was with the JROTC unit in my High School.
Then, in the fall of 1979, when I was 17 and starting my last year of High School, also with the JROTC unit. A weekend with the Army Reserve, firing 105mm howitzers.
No one told us we wouldn’t be driving out to the firing range at Dugway… they just drove out to a nearby exercise area where we fired a few blank rounds… then our transport showed up:
They hooked up the 105s, then we loaded into a couple without guns, and flew off!
My first fixed-wing flight was June 4, 1981… a B737 taking me to USMC boot camp in San Diego, Ca.
Just an aside to the title of this thread…
Brazil crossed off Typhoon, F-16, and Su-35 from its list for its new fighter, and is moving forward with further evaluations & negotiations with a “short-list” of F/A-18E/F, Rafale, and Gripen-N.
The Mirage 2000s are scheduled to be the first replaced… why on earth would they get more?
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D93I2U0G3.htm
The Associated Press October 1, 2008, 10:12PM ET
Brazil picks 3 finalists for fighter jet contract
By ALAN CLENDENNING
SAO PAULO, BrazilBrazil’s air force announced Wednesday that it will choose between American, French and Swedish fighter jets to revamp its fleet.
The short list includes Boeing Co.’s F-18 E/F Super Hornet, Dassault Aviation’s Rafale and Saab’s Gripen NG, the air force said in a statement.Brazil will buy 36 new planes to replace its current Dassault-made Mirage fighter jets, with the first deliveries set for 2014. The air force did not say when it will make a final choice or how much it plans to spend, but Brazil’s private Agencia Estado news service estimated it would pay about US$2.5 billion for the planes.
Each of the three finalists offers “engineering of the highest sophistication,” Defense Minister Nelson Jobim said, according to Agencia Estado.
Russia’s Sukhoi SU-35, the Eurofighter Typhoon and Lockheed Martin’s F-35 were eliminated from the candidate list, the air force said.Brazil is seeking to link its purchases of fighter jets and other defense upgrades to broader partnerships that will help the country develop its own state-of-the-art weapons industry, Strategic Affairs Minister Roberto Mangabeira Unger told The Associated Press earlier this month.
“We will not simply be buyers or clients, but partners,” he said. “Any arrangement into which we will enter must, in principle, contemplate a significant element of research and development in Brazil.”
France this year promised to provide Brazil with technology to build the Scorpene attack submarine, a conventional diesel-powered vessel that Brazilian officials hope to use to develop what would be Latin America’s first nuclear-propelled submarine.In the mid-1980s, Brazil had the largest defense industry in the developing world. It became the world’s eighth-largest arms exporter amid strong demand for its armored personnel carriers, reconnaissance and anti-aircraft vehicles, troop carriers and rocket launchers.
The industry went into a tailspin when the Cold War ended and demand for weapons declined. In 1990, Brazil’s two largest arms manufacturers, Engesa and Avibras, sought protection from creditors for debts of about US$200 million.
Well they found his plane and some of his effects, not over till they find him….!
Human remains found in the wreckage.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/FOSSETT_SEARCH?SITE=MITRA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Search for the missing second pilot has been suspended.
On the Brazilian contract, I found this on one news site:
“The stated initial requirement is for 36 aircraft, with the potential for up to 120 aircraft.”
Apparently they are indeed considering going to a one-type fleet… which is why the A2G-limited Typhoon got the axe.
With a 1-type fleet, they need a true multi-role aircraft with full A2A and A2G capabilities.
With a NATO-compatible weapons system in place, integrating all those weapons on the Su-35 would add considerable cost, and moving to Russian weapons even more, thus bye-bye Su-35.
Super Hornet is more capable in all areas than F-16anyblock, so adios Falcon.
With the Rafale, the Brazilians might be hoping to strike a deal for more ex-AdlA Mirage 2000s as well. For example, purchase twenty Rafales, and get enough for twenty to forty Mirage 2000s, i.e. enough to replace pretty much everything in service. It is one thing the French really have in their favour in the contest. With upgrades, a mix of Mirage 2000s (2000-9 upgrade perhaps?) and Rafales would be a pretty good match for the Venezuelan Flankers.
The stated initial requirement is for 36 aircraft, with the potential for up to 120 aircraft.
I really doubt they would go for more M-2000s, even upgraded ones, when they are looking at replacein them as well over time.
Just for people with short memory.
That were the promises:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita…f-35-specs.htm
That is the present situation despite some cutting measures already:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35_Lightning_IIThe Raptor was promised with 14,365 tons and is quoted now:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RL31673.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22_Raptor
First source…
Empty weight:
F-35A: 22,500-26,500 lb (9,980-12,045 kg)
F-35B: 23,500-30,000 lb (10,660-13,636 kg)
F-35C: 24,000-30,000 lb (10,885-13,636 kg)
second source…
Empty weight:
A: 29,036 lb, 13,170 kg +32% over lightest early estimate, +20.5% over average early estimate,
+9% over heaviest early estimate
B: 32,161 lb, 14,588 kg +37% over lightest early estimate, +22% over average early estimate,
+7% over heaviest early estimate
C: 32,070 lb, 14,547 kg +34% over lightest early estimate, +20.5% over average early estimate,
+7% over heaviest early estimate
And, just how many Raptors were to make up that 14,000+ TONS?
You’re right.
I should’a looked at my copy of the double Mamba entry from Jane’s… it says the props are spun completely independent of each other.
Just like the interweb to be wrong… :p