dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,476 through 2,490 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ship Defense: M-2 .50cal vs GAU-19A .50 cal??? #2075820
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The early USN nickname for the Phalanx CIWS was “Ch%!st, It Won’t Shoot”.

    What good is the bestest, most awesome, neato, high-tech weapon if it won’t work when your life depends on it?

    in reply to: KC767, KC45 ….. Latest news! #2480110
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Ideally I guess would probably buy tankers with both systems on them.

    Which is exactly the spec for the tanker-replacement competition(s).

    Both the KC-767 & KC-45A are to be equipped with wing-mounted hoses and a centerline-mounted boom.

    in reply to: RAAF Hudson found in PNG #1216496
    Bager1968
    Participant

    This is a policy I never understood.

    US/Australia: bring them home

    UK: abandon in place

    in reply to: Wookies overhead #2480851
    Bager1968
    Participant

    “Wookies overhead”

    Really? Large, furry aliens flying above you?
    😮

    Don’t you mean “Wokkas”?
    😉

    in reply to: Hilarious Mistakes On Screen #1217450
    Bager1968
    Participant

    And just for the debate from 6 months ago…

    Blue Thunder: theater release date: May 13, 1983 (USA)

    Airwolf: pilot episode air date: January 22, 1984

    Donald P. Bellisario developed Airwolf (early working titles: Blackwolf, Lonewolf), from the loose concept of a third season ‘Magnum p.i.’ episode he’d previously written, titled ‘Two Birds Of A Feather’ – an unsold Pilot about a treasure-hunting, adventure-loving ace combat pilot named Sam Houston Hunter (William Lucking). Bellisario had come up with the concept after Lucking played a similar character in a couple of episodes of another Bellisario series, ‘Tales Of The Gold Monkey’ (1982-3). After the proposed new series wasn’t picked up, Bellisario took the bare bones of the concept, and eventually developed the premise into ‘Airwolf’.

    I was in the USMC (air wing) at the time of both these, and we all had many laughs about the “features” of them.

    in reply to: F-14 missile armament #2484697
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The two F-14 squadrons aboard USS Ranger CV-61 in 1986-87 most definitely carried Phoenix missiles for CAP.

    Normal load was 4 AIM-54 under the fuselage, 2 AIM-7 Sparrow (low) and two AIM-9 Sidewinder (high) on the wing-glove pylons. Add two drop tanks under the intakes, and that’s what I saw launching all the time.

    in reply to: That doesn't look right… #2486834
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The things they did to try to get a minimally useful range out of that thing.

    in reply to: Your aviation connection? #1224361
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Interested in planes as long as I can remember (first 5 years lived a few miles from Stead AFB, now the site of the Reno Air Races… then it was still an active USAF base), and knew what a “sonic boom” was, and how it was formed, before I could read.

    Avid modeler (warships as well as aircraft) from 8 or so.

    6/81-6/89 in USMC, fixing avionics on A-6E Intruders & F/A-18A Hornets (and consorting with KC-130R, A-4M, F-4S, & A-7E types… as well as a year aboard a USN carrier with F-14s, E-2s, S-3s, SH-3s, & a lone EA-3 Skywarrior).

    in reply to: "Boeing Wins Protest of Northrop Aerial-Tanker Award" #2488726
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Part of that “do over” will hurt Boeing as much as Airbus.

    Boeing is complaining about the USAF modifying its solicitation in a manner which kept Airbus from being disqualified… but that came after Boeing got a “re-write” on the solicitation (on a different point) which kept the KC-767 from being disqualified.

    If the originally solicited specifications, etc are used, BOTH proposals will be disqualified.

    in reply to: Horsa Gliders Into Homes #1228588
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Well, that’s a Horsa of a different color.
    😉

    in reply to: Has Anybody Heard Anything From Jules Horowitz #1230016
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Found him here:
    http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/eaw-european-air-war/ww2-b17-4370-2.html

    Last post 17 May 2008, so still active as of a month ago, but an unanswered question from the same date leaves room for worry.

    Perhaps a query could be made there?

    in reply to: Amazing pics of Pearl Harbour WWII #2076567
    Bager1968
    Participant

    You will find those two words “cowardice” and “sneak attack” in nearly every account or mention of the attack from noon (Hawaii time) Dec. 7, 1941 until the 1970s, so I really doubt that it is a modern phenomenon… we are just repeating the description in the history books, movies, that our parents/grandparents, etc used… and so on.

    I realize that it was a sound way of executing the less-than-brilliant plan, and required considerably courage by all involved, but the fact still remains that it was a “sneak attack”.

    The much ballyhood multi-part message that was delivered late by the Japanese Ambassador did NOT, in any way, constitute a “Declaration of War”.

    It said that Japan was breaking off negotiations… something that did not automatically mean a commencement of hostilities… either then or now.

    Even if it had been delivered before the attack started, there would still have been NO “State of War”, and the attack would still have been a peacetime attack.

    in reply to: USAF Chief of staff, SecAF forced out. #2494887
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Gen. Norton A. Schwartz has been appointed Air Force Chief of Staff. He comes from Mobility, being a former transport pilot, and has Special Ops background too. This is a huge slap down for the fighter mafia who ruled the USAF since its inception in 1947.

    Not true… but close.

    Schwartz is outgoing head of US Transportation Command and a long-time Special Operations Hercules pilot. He’ll be the first non-fighter pilot as CoS since Lew Allen (1978-1982).

    Allen was a technogeek extrordinare, working in nuclear weapons, space systems, and intelligence programs that were way outside the main Air Force mission of the era.

    Before Allen, the CoS job had been dominated by bomber pilots all the way back to LeMay*. After Allen, it’s 100% fighter jocks.

    *First CoS of the USAF after it gained independent status.

    in reply to: B-2 Crash footage on Guam! #2495656
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Direct link to the crash report. (PDF)
    http://www.acc.af.mil/media/archives/story.asp?id=123101589

    Water in the airflow sensors during ground calibration (maintenance forgot to turn on the sensor heaters) caused the flight computer to completely misread the aircraft attitude (the flight crew had turned on the heaters, and dried out the sensors).

    Moisture in the aircraft’s Port Transducer Units during air data calibration distorted the information in the bomber’s air data system, causing the flight control computers to calculate an inaccurate airspeed and a negative angle of attack upon takeoff. According to the report, this caused an, “uncommanded 30 degree nose-high pitch-up on takeoff, causing the aircraft to stall and its subsequent crash.”

    in reply to: US Military Aviation News #2497522
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I am surprised at their surprise… The USMC has long planned not to replace the EA-6B Prowlers, but to simply retire them when the entire USMC fighter force is F-35Bs.

    The F-35 has extensive EA capabilities built into its radar and EW systems, and will not need a separate jammer aircraft. The USN is building the EA-18G Growler more to protect the F/A-18E/F fleet than to help its F-35Cs.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,476 through 2,490 (of 3,360 total)