dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Not Spitfires but buried U-Boat and whatever else? #941047
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Perhaps he had just the one spot in his yard to be patched.

    in reply to: Boeing KC-46 #2230772
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Which makes one wonder if the added money would have made a difference?

    in reply to: Not Spitfires but buried U-Boat and whatever else? #942651
    Bager1968
    Participant

    When you have the boat & equipment – and lots of time due to being unemployed – then lots of things become “profitable” that corporations could never view the same way.

    in reply to: Boeing KC-46 #2230987
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The boom still hasn’t been cleared for use yet – despite being several years after Airbus had contracted for the boom to be cleared.

    in reply to: Iran building mock-up Aircraft carrier #2031207
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Apparently:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]226589[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: What was the best post-WW II fighter ? #944450
    Bager1968
    Participant

    First, what do you mean by “post WW II fighter”?

    “Post WW II” can mean anything up to this year. I assume (a big gamble) that, from your list, you mean aircraft that were in service at the end of the war.

    In that case I would include the de Havilland Vampire.

    Second, there is no such thing as a “thrust to weight ratio” for propeller-driven aircraft, only for jet/rocket propelled aircraft.

    Third, that is impossible to quantify in one characteristic – some of the most successful fighters were slower, or had less acceleration, or a poorer climb rate, or roll rate, or dive speed, or turn rate than aircraft they were successful against.

    What was important was that they had SOME characteristics better than their opponents, and most critically that they had well-trained pilots who used well-develop tactics that emphasized the good points of their aircraft and minimized the good points of the enemy aircraft.

    in reply to: Boeing KC-46 #2231171
    Bager1968
    Participant

    True, but the A330MRTT are flying. Given that few of the existing customers even really use the boom it’s not a huge priority either.

    Tell that to the RAAF, who were planning to use the boom for their P-8As and other aircraft (F-35A, etc), but can’t because it doesn’t work yet.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2031265
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Actually, 1 1/2. The Russian-built half of the hull of the second has not yet left its builder for France.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -V #2031347
    Bager1968
    Participant

    France May Scrap Russian Warship Deal over Ukraine Crisis

    Two more Mistral for french navy?

    More like two for export elsewhere – Turkey perhaps, or maybe India?

    Bager1968
    Participant

    The United States Douglas O-46 (produced 1936-37) was an observation aircraft used by the United States Army Air Corps and the Philippine Army Air Corps. It used the Pratt & Whitney R-1535-7.

    At least 11 O-46s saw overseas duty; two were destroyed in the Japanese raid on Clark Field in the Philippines on 8 December 1941. The type was relegated to training and utility roles in late 1942.

    So an aircraft fleeing the Japanese invasion of the Philippines may well have reached Darwin.

    in reply to: B-17 with turboprop engine #948335
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Also, don’t forget the other turboprop B-17, a fire fighter outfitted with four Darts taken from an ex-United Air Lines Viscount.

    Here it is:

    in reply to: Why the Supermarine Scimitar was rarely mentioned? #950071
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The second photo is labeled as “Centaur class carrier” and “1958”.

    The only Centaur-class carrier to carry the huge 3-D radar “dustbin” was Hermes – which commissioned in 1959.
    The details of the island and the front of the angle deck do not match Hermes, but do match the modernized Illustrious class carrier Victorious.

    That photo, like the one above it, is of Victorious.
    In fact, I already had that exact photo (but larger), with the label “HMS Victorious 1959 with USN aircraft”.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2232712
    Bager1968
    Participant

    http://www.janes.com/article/35119/saab-to-offer-gripen-c-d-upgrades-pushes-exports

    However, with the Gripen C and Gripen E sharing little in terms of common structures and systems, the only items likely to be cross-decked will be the windscreen and canopy, the outer elevons, the ejection-seat, the internal gun and conveyor system, and some other ancillary equipment.

    The plan is that the SwAF will be left with 60 Gripen E and no Gripen C aircraft (the 15 Gripen Cs from the current inventory not included in the conversion contract will be retired) by the time the work is complete halfway through the next decade. In reality, the dearth of common parts means there will in fact still be 60 nearly complete Gripen Cs left at the end of the process, which should not require much refurbishment work to turn them into exportable aircraft.

    http://www.air-cosmos.com/defense/saab-veut-rendre-le-gripen-plus-furtif.html translation:

    We knew he had to carry more fuel, more weapons , while with a weapons system completely renovated. But the Gripen E , the latest evolution of the Swedish JAS39 single engine being developed by Saab in Sweden and Switzerland, should also be more stealthy. “We are contractually obligated to reduce radar signature equivalent of the device ,” said Björn Johansson today , chief engineer of the Gripen E program during a press conference held in Linköping in the stronghold the Swedish manufacturer .

    If the means used to achieve this goal have obviously not been exposed in detail, however, the engineer noted that this increased stealth would be achieved ” by a combination of structural changes and new materials .”

    New-build airframes incorporating structural changes and new materials, new radar and avionics, new engines.

    Sounds like a lot of R&D specific to Gripen-E, as well as a lot of build cost.

    in reply to: Naval deployment to Black Sea? #2031589
    Bager1968
    Participant

    But his statement was NOT “the largest exercise in the world”, but instead “the largest exercise for the Israeli air force“.

    As the IDF has more aircraft regularly involved in Anatolian Eagle than they ever had in Red Flag, the answer is clear as to which his statement covered.

    in reply to: RAF AWACS to monitor Ukraine Border #2233095
    Bager1968
    Participant

    They are. stop ******* lying. The two choices are : either leaving Ukraine and join Russia, or Return to 1992 constitution – in other words stray with Ukraine but have self-regulation like it was agreed but erroded by west Ukrainians throughout the years.

    No. The May 1992 constitution declared Crimea an independent republic.

    In 1994 Crimea nullified the May 1992 constitution, and over the next year created a new constitution in which it joined with the rest of Ukraine, with Crimea as a semi-autonomous region within the nation of Ukraine.

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 3,360 total)