“Yeah they are just parts of the structure and despite what some people claim they are not 052C type radar panels.”
The Varyag was originally designed for phased-array radars, that is just the mounting base where they would have been if they had ever been installed.
Thanks…. I have always wondered what the end result would have been if this aircraft had been modified in the mid-1970s with a computer-controlled FBW system like what had been developed for the F-16.
Would there have been a successful VSTOL transport in service with the USMC by Desert Storm?
This aircraft was to have a cargo & troop load similar to the CH-46, CH-3/HH-3, and the MV-22 Osprey.
I really like the XC-142A in front of the Valkyrie…… 4 engine tilt-wing VSTOL prototype that did carrier landings & take-offs in the late 1960s.
I’ve got a so-so copy of that video…. was produced for the Blue Angels 40th anniversary.
The America was very worn out…. on her last deployment she suffered several major problems, including the control gear on one elevator letting loose and allowing it to drop to the hangar deck level in an uncontrolled manner, damaging an aircraft and injuring several crewmen.
She had not had a Service Life Extension Program modernization to give her that last 15 years of life, therefore she was right near the 35 year life that was planned when she was built. (Only the CVNs are designed for 50 years from the start)
The Kitty Hawk has had a SLEP, that is why she is still in good condition.
The problem with putting her up as a museum is that there are 3 other large CVs currently under preservation efforts: CV-59 Forrestal (the first “supercarrier”), CV-60 Saratoga (both on the east coast), and the CV-61 Ranger (on the west coast). In addition, the smaller CV 41 Midway is a museum on the west coast. Also preserved are the WW 2 veteran carriers CV-10 Yorktown (east coast), CV-11 Intrepid (east coast), CV-12 Hornet (west coast), and CV-16 Lexington (gulf coast).
Even a country as large and wealthy as the US can support only so many museum ships of the same type!
looking forward to them. 😉
Nice photos…. I deployed on the Ranger in the late 1980s, thus missing the F-8 Crusaders and the A-7 Corsair IIs, but have always liked them!
Good to see them remembered!
I looked as hard as I could, but couldn’t see the USMC A-7 from VMA-147. I really wanted to, as it would have been the only Corsair II operated by the USMC!
OK, I’m being sarcastic and should really stop, so I’ll apologize if my attempt at humor was offensive.
For further ID purposes, USMC aircraft all say “Marines” on their side….. if it says “Navy” then that is who owned it. USMC squadrons also have an “M” in their designator, as in my “funny” above.
The USMC decided not to buy any A-7s in order to spend the money on the AV-8A/C program. They only made a small buy of the Harrier I, and kept their remaining A-4s until the AV-8B Harrier II (active squadrons) and F/A-18A (reserve squadrons) replaced them.
Again, nice photos.
I’ve been interested in the history, politics, and development of the Bolivia-Peru-Chile-Gran Chaco area for some time. Thanks for this nice site.
The only problem is it has been 27 years since my high-school Spanish classes.
Is there a good way to get a translation? (I don’t count the Babelfish translating program as “good”.)
There is a flying Vampire based at Hinckley Field (formerly the Ogden Municipal Airport) in Ogden, Utah, USA. I don’t know the airframe numbers or owner, but have seen it many times.
Yes, HALO has nothing to do with cannisters or pods, it involves paratroops (usually, but not always, Special Forces) leaving the aircraft at several thousand feet (I don’t know the usual number) above ground level, but not opening the parachute until just enough altitude is left for the chute to slow them to a safe landing speed before touching down.
In most parachute landings, most of the descent with the chute open is done at the same speed, HALO simply removes all that slow, wind-affected gliding and converts the “flight” into more high-speed, controlled falling.
1. CAF, it is home-based here.
2. The main use for the Avenger in US service was as a combat aircraft, so to me that is the most historic use and representation.
3. How in the *^%#$#% do you consider it a “bogus” aircraft!!! There were many that were never converted to any other use that have been pulled fron the scrapyards to be restored.
4. I much prefer a flying aircraft to a static display….. which was it built to be and do?
5. I am not knocking static displays of non-airworthy airframes… much better than scrapping them!!
6. Nor am I opposing the preservation of a variant that saw much vital service in protecting the property and livelihood of Canada’s citizens…. as this is what BOTH versions did!
7. As a USMC veteran, dismissing the aircraft and it’s service as “just another all WW2 reconfigurated one with a turret” gives the impression that we boring you by remembering the service of all the “flying bogus military TBM” and all those who flew them into combat. Is your problem with how many are left (too many to be a Historic Aircraft?) or with commemorating the fact that they were designed and used in warfare?
Nice, but I’m very privileged to live in Grand Junction, Colorado USA (on the other side of the mountains from Denver…. right beside the Utah state line).
Our local airport is home to a fully restored (in WW 2 combat configuration, except the guns don’t work, darn it!!) TBM, which flies at airshows around the country. If I get up the money (~$150 I think…. I’ll find out if anyone wants me to), I can get a ride in the “back seat” (either the navigator’s spot in the middle of the greenhouse, or in the turret).
Much better than a fire-fighter conversion that is (am I right?) going to be a static display!
As a veteran USMC jet avionics tech, and historic aircraft lover, who normally desires preservation and restoration, and who is also a diver…. all I can say is that she is still doing the job she was made for….. training people!
There are many Marine archeaologists, historians, and similar people who used to be merely recreational divers, but received enlightenment on some “rotting piece of abandoned metal”!
Sitting on the bottom of a lake, creating interest in otherwise non-aviation aware bubbleheads, is much better than being ground up at the recyclers, or rotting in a field & covered in weeds.
“USAF storage is at Tucson (Davis Monthan), Mojave is full of airliners.”
Just a nit-pick here…. Mojave is a desert located in the south-eastern part of the State of California, with small parts extending into the southern-most part of the State of Nevada and the western part of the State of Arizona.
Davis-Monthan AFB is in the south-eastern part of the State of Arizona….. about 3 hundred miles from any part of the Mojave Desert.
This, to a Yank, is like referring to the Grampians as a Shire or County, not a mountain range, would be to a Scot.
Otherwise, yes, D-M AFB is home to many mothballed (flyable), stored, and waiting-to-be-scrapped Historic aircraft…. so many, that I sometimes get depressed at how hard it is to free any of them from the current owners (US gov., airlines, etc.), many of whom care nothing about their historic value, only about their scrap and parts value.