dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: US/UK SSBN news #2009859
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I especially like how:
    1. building 4 new SSBNs with missile compartments jointly-developed with (and development mostly funded by) the USN, and
    2. buying missiles also jointly-developed with (and development mostly funded by) the USN

    is supposed to be so much more expensive than:
    1. building several new SSGNs with missile sections developed (and funded) solely by the UK, and
    2. developing and buying a new long-range nuclear-capable cruise missile developed (and funded) solely by the UK!

    Really? And yes, the Astutes cannot be reasonably modified to carry that new missile… as there is simply no way anything longer-ranged than a Tomahawk can fit in Astute’s launch tubes.

    I suppose you could cut them in half and insert a missile section, like the USN did with one incomplete Skipjack class SSN to create their first SSBN (all the others of the first group were laid down to the plans drawn up for the modification, with follow-ons built to a “clean-sheet” design)… but as that would cost nearly as much extra as simply building a new, longer Astute with the missile compartment added from the start, it is NOT a “reasonable” option.

    in reply to: Netherlands – another chance for Gripen? #2288343
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The motion to stop our commitments was one made by socialists (SP) alongside the social-democrats (PvdA). Those same social-democrats have been engaged in negotiations to form a new Cabinet with the Liberals who are in favour of the JSF program. It is rumoured that the negotiations have reached their final stage and that the commitments to the testphase as well as the JSF program will not be stopped nor adjusted. A final decision on the F-16 replacement will be made in 2015, although several officials have advised a decision to be made more speedily.

    Both the MoD as well as the RNLAF are still strongly supporting the F-35A over the Gripen NG.

    New developments:

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/139774/new-dutch-government-changes-fighter-plans.html

    Hmmm…

    The coalition agreement recognizes that the original plans regarding the replacement of the F-16 – i.e., buying the F-35 – are not feasible without adaptations or a re-setting of priorities within the overall defense budget.
    …..
    As part of its review of options, the coalition also has agreed to launch a detailed evaluation of the Operating and Support (O&S) costs of whatever fighter it selects to replace the F-35. This will be carried out by the Algemene Rekenkamer at the request of the Finance Ministry.

    Sounds like they have pretty well decided NOT to buy production F-35s, then.

    Participation in the F-35 test & development program to continue, but the operational procurement part is back to being an open competition.

    in reply to: Future UK MPA/ASW aircraft #2288358
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Jonesey,

    Wow an ASW Amphibian! I like the idea, however unrealistic it first appears.

    Bring back the Martin P6M SeaMaster!

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/P6M_SeaMaster.jpg/699px-P6M_SeaMaster.jpg

    in reply to: Future UK MPA/ASW aircraft #2288364
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Equally quiet diesel-electric and AIP submarines can and do go wherever they like. They are all not going to hide in their own coastal waters under home fighter cover as you appear to suggest.

    No they can go where they like within a very marked radius of action…otherwise they need surface logistics support. The SSK, despite the best efforts of builders all over the world, is little more than a mobile minefield and…if its staying discrete…not really all that mobile. You never caught a snorting diesel in your 40yrs?!. They have, in the main, a modest sensor envelope and no ability to run fast. SSK’s are dangerous in chokes and where a good CO can exploit local knowledge.

    Happy that I can agree with you on one point at least.

    So somehow between 1945 and now submarine tech has regressed?

    Because I seem to remember German SSKs being a significant threat to the US coastline… and even into the Gulf of Mexico… with virtually no surface logistics support! Much of what they needed was supplied by other subs, and even without any resupply they were able to sail from their bases on the south-western coast of France or in north-western Germany/Denmark to the mid-Atlantic, patrol for a while, and return.

    And then there were the Soviet Romeo-class subs that could make the mid-Atlantic on a round trip from the Kola peninsula.

    So modern non-nuclear-powered subs can’t do that? Wow, you learn something every day!

    in reply to: helicopter pilot losses in vietnam war #2288411
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I’ve seen an account by a flier who was aboard one of the carriers, as well as a good close-up of the famous movie shot of the UH-1s being dumped over the side.

    They both confirm that almost all of the dumped aircraft (both helicopter & F-5A/A-37s) were VNAF birds, not USAF/USA/USN/USMC.

    Of course then you have the famous photo of the UH-1 hovering at the roof of the embassy in Cambodia with people climbing in and lined up on the stairs. The bird is painted white with no national markings… because it was CIA-owned.

    in reply to: Japanese "Tora ,Tora,Tora" replicas #989828
    Bager1968
    Participant

    A quick bit of “Googling” turned up this:

    http://www.mcasiwakuni.marines.mil/News/Photos.aspx?mgqs=2255991

    Obviously it has been painted since I read the article mentioned above.

    Yep… that’s the same aircraft and bunker!

    The aircraft is in the same paint scheme as when it arrived at the base, but the bunker has had the concrete apron added.

    When I was there the summer of 1984 there was grass there.

    Good news… I did find my photos… and there is a series in & around the bunker, as well as ones from all around the Zero… including a few close-ups!

    The bad news is that they are all “transparencies” (slides)… and therefore will have to be converted to digital before I can post them! If they were prints I could scan them in myself, but I’ll have to do these another way.

    Sorry about that, but I hadn’t thought about them for years.

    This is the cover of our “deployment book”:

    http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b336/Bager1968/other%20stuff/VMAAW-242logo.gif

    in reply to: My first real military aviation experience #990005
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I suppose you could say that my first military aviation experience was the ride the Army Reserves were giving in a UH-1H at an open house for the local reserve unit when I was a sophomore in high school, but as it was open to the general public I don’t really count that.

    To me it was my junior year in high school, when our HS Army JROTC unit was out for a “field weekend”, and in the middle of us running a navigation exercise we were bounced by a pair of Army AH-1s at ~200′ AGL. We were called back to the base (actually a local National Forest campground with a nice large meadow) just in time for a pair of CH-47 Chinooks and an OH-6 Cayuse to land in the meadow, with the Cobras hovering to “cover” the landing. The Cobras then landed and we got to talk to the crews and look over the aircraft with them.

    That was the spring of 1979… that fall we went out to the local Army reserve training area with the artillery unit (105mm howitzers) from Fort Douglas, Salt Lake City, Utah and learned how to set up and break down the guns to/from firing positions. We had expected to spend the whole weekend there, and watch some live-fire, but the Army had different plans.

    The next morning a batch of Chinooks appeared and landed, and we had to load everything inside… then they took off and hovered while the Reservists slinged up the guns! As I was the senior cadet present, they left me to “supervise” the loadings, so I was on the last Chinook to lift off… having watched them take the guns away.

    We flew about 80 miles to the west to the Dugway Proving Grounds, where we set up and fired the guns. They split us up among the gun crews, and during the firing, between all the gun crews, we cadets actually performed every job except setting the fuzes on the shells. Even that was actually covered… they were under orders not to let us set the fuze timers, but I was screwing the fuzes in the shells while the Tech Sgt set them right in front of me, and he explained everything he was doing… and showed me step-by-step.

    That evening the trucks showed up, and the next day we drove back to Fort Douglas, where the buses to take us back to our school were waiting.

    Here are two photos I took that day.

    We took both State and Regional championships my Senior year in Small-bore Rifle Indoor shooting (.22 cal) and in Exhibition Drill With Arms.

    And yes, those are real M1903A3 Springfield 30-06 rifles in the Drill Team photo, with the original wood stocks. We always prided ourselves on being able to throw and spin those throughout the whole routine, while many other teams used “drill weapons” (with plastic stocks & sheet-metal-over-wood barrels).

    The Drill Team photo has me in the front row on the viewer’s left, and I’m front row viewer’s right in the Rifle Team shot.

    in reply to: Japanese "Tora ,Tora,Tora" replicas #992025
    Bager1968
    Participant

    There were certainly replicas made in Japan… I have touched one!

    In mid-1984 my USMC A-6E squadron was deployed to MCAS Iwakuni, Japan. We went down to the Philippines for 6 weeks, and when we returned to Japan there was a Zero sitting in one of the hangars. I was able to walk all around and under it, and I am sure I took at least a couple of photos of it. It was definitely not a converted T-6.

    There was an old concrete single-plane shelter on the base, on the west side between the USMC and JMSDF halves of the base, that I explored. It is my understanding that the intention was to display the Zero-replica there on a permanent basis, as soon as they got more things ready for the display.

    I’ll look through my archives and see if I still have the photos.

    in reply to: General Discussion #284046
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The replica HMS Bounty has been sunk, crew taken out of life boats sadly twp other crew members are missing.

    Things can be rebuilt, things can be replaced but a life never can be.

    The body of Claudine Christian (42), supposedly a direct descendent of Fletcher Christian, was pulled from the water by the Coast Guard a couple of hours ago.

    The ship’s Captain is still missing.

    http://5newsonline.com/2012/10/29/claudine-christian-missing/

    in reply to: Hurricane Sandy #1880159
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The replica HMS Bounty has been sunk, crew taken out of life boats sadly twp other crew members are missing.

    Things can be rebuilt, things can be replaced but a life never can be.

    The body of Claudine Christian (42), supposedly a direct descendent of Fletcher Christian, was pulled from the water by the Coast Guard a couple of hours ago.

    The ship’s Captain is still missing.

    http://5newsonline.com/2012/10/29/claudine-christian-missing/

    in reply to: The first successful radar-guided interception #996735
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Bager1968, any reading you recommend on that first Beaufighter radar intercept ?

    Just the book in the link in the quote in my earlier post.

    I’ll repeat it.

    http://aircraft-photographs.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/Bomber-Bristol-Beaufighter-RAF-anti-shipping-fighter-36.htm

    in reply to: The first successful radar-guided interception #997896
    Bager1968
    Participant

    OK… as I said, I hadn’t looked at them.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2010161
    Bager1968
    Participant

    2:03-2:33, stern-stern refueling at anchor?

    Port too deep to fuel before undocking?

    3:25+, God, I miss that sight (and feel, and smell… the heave of the deck, the tang of the salt air, the wind over the deck, the hull cutting through the water)… VMA(AW)-121 aboard CV-61 USS Ranger 11/1985-12/1987.

    Sigh… nostalgia for the vanished days of our youth.

    in reply to: The first successful radar-guided interception #998025
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Well done.

    Anyone looked up the entry for U571?

    Moggy 😉

    I’ve never written an article from scratch… while I have never looked up that particular Wiki entry, I strongly suspect that it is so screwed up (due to the movie) that a total re-write would be needed.

    in reply to: The first successful radar-guided interception #998047
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Fixed the Wiki article.

    {edit: And the Wikibot undid my edit, because it found lots of entries on the ‘net supporting the Wiki entry. Unfortunately, all those are simply copies or quotes of the Wiki article… creating a false “circular logic” chain! I reported the problem, with the following:

    The entry is deceptive, in that it claims the F4U radar-guided interception was the first successful one… period.

    To the contrary, it was merely the first by a USN or USMC aircraft, as noted on page 199 of Ace!: A Marine Night-Fighter Pilot in World War II – By R. Bruce Porter, Eric Hammel http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=GQr5TXfSGd8C&lpg=PA199&ots=EKE0Dxv7gH&dq=major%20thomas%20hicks%20f4u&pg=PA199#v=onepage&q=major%20thomas%20hicks%20f4u&f=false

    The first successful radar-guided interception by any nation was achieved on the night of 19/20 November 1940, by F.Lt John Cunningham of No. 604 Squadron, flying a Bristol Beaufighter. http://aircraft-photographs.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/Bomber-Bristol-Beaufighter-RAF-anti-shipping-fighter-36.htm

    Please replace my correction, as your bot is wrong (it is likely relying on all the other internet sites that have quoted your incorrect entry as being proof that your entry is correct). Circular logic is never correct.

    Now that book only claims that that was the first successful Beaufighter radar-guided interception, but at least it is still proof that the 1943 was NOT “the first” ever.

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 3,360 total)