dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rip RAAF F111's #1083044
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Yep… that was the one delivered for ground training.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2317576
    Bager1968
    Participant

    S-70 = MH 60 ?

    S-70 = Sikorsky company designation for the Blackhawk/Seahawk helicopter

    MH/SH/UH-60 = US military designation for Blackhawk/Seahawk helicopter

    Most Blackhawk/Seahawk helicopters sold by Sikorsky directly to foreign customers carry the S-70 designation, while those sold via the US government Foreign Military Sales route carry the MH/SH/UH-60 designation.

    in reply to: The film Stratigic Air Command… #1083049
    Bager1968
    Participant

    One reply I had stated it was James Stewart’s least favourite movie & he didn’t even want it released on video.

    Well, it might have hit too close to home for him (remember, actor Jimmy Stewart was also B.Gen James M. Stewart, USAFRES(R).

    He enlisted in the USAAF in mid-1941 as a “civilian pilot”, and had to fight like h@ll to escape his training command assignment (finally going to Europe as a B-24 pilot in late 1943).

    He had remained in the USAF (Reserve) after the war, which is undoubtedly why that movie was so good… he made sure the details were right.

    However, unlike his character in SAC, he was not chosen to fly either B-36s or B-47s, but was mainly an administrative officer, despite his earlier combat bomber pilot service.

    in reply to: B-25…what do you think of the Art Work? #1083153
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Thanks for the question

    Tom

    Thanks for the info… my knowledge has increased.

    in reply to: Mystery canopy #1083186
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Bottom edge of that piece is curved, the one in the OP is not.

    in reply to: What to see and do in New York #1084281
    Bager1968
    Participant

    http://www.cradleofaviation.org/general_info/generalf.html

    The Cradle of Aviation Museum is an aerospace museum located in East Garden City, New York on Long Island to commemorate Long Island’s part in the history of aviation. It is located on land once part of Mitchel Air Force Base which, together with nearby Roosevelt Field and other airfields on the Hempstead Plains, was the site of many historic flights. In fact, so many seminal flights occurred in the area, that by the mid-1920s the cluster of airfields was already dubbed the “Cradle of Aviation”, the origin of the museum’s name

    Look at the aircraft on display (click on a time period, then look on the right side of the screen).

    If there are any there you just have to see…
    http://www.cradleofaviation.org/exhibits/index.html

    http://www.americanairpowermuseum.org/Website/Index.aspx

    The American Airpower Museum, is an aviation museum located on the former site of Republic Aviation at Republic Airport in East Farmingdale, New York. It maintains a collection of aviation artifacts and an array of aircraft spanning the many years of the aircraft factory’s history.

    The museum is one of relatively few worldwide that actually flies historic aircraft, in addition to its static display aircraft, vehicles, and other exhibits. It operates an original Republic P-47D fighter among others in its airworthy fleet.

    http://www.oldrhinebeck.org/

    The Old Rhinebeck Aerodrome is a museum of World War I aircraft and antique automobiles that is located in Red Hook, New York, USA.

    https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/operating/opdm/aviation/museums
    https://www.dot.ny.gov/divisions/operating/opdm/aviation/repository/museumsmapjun28.gif

    in reply to: B-25…what do you think of the Art Work? #1084294
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I see no sign of the tail guns.

    Were they removed on your aircraft when it was in that paint scheme?

    in reply to: Rip RAAF F111's #1084298
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Counting the aircraft listed on the ADF serials site, I get 45 total airframes delivered to the RAAF (including 1 non-flying airframe for training {63-9768; A1-93} and 1 for complete fatigue/corrosion teardown inspection {67-0106; A1-151}).

    As the last resulted in a pile of parts (the operative term being “complete teardown”), there would be 23 airframes remaining (45 – 1 reduced to components – 8 crashed – 6 already preserved – 7 to be preserved = 23)… exactly the number being buried.

    in reply to: RAN Selection of MH-60R #2029647
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Badger you salty old seadog, how you been mate?

    That reminds me; has Sikorsky offered the Battlehawk to any other customer or did they shelve the idea after Australia refused it in the first round?

    I don’t know about the BattleHawk, haven’t heard anything… although that very lack of hearing anything probably means no one was interested and the proposal was shelved.

    I’m doing OK… any chance of you steering me to a source of info on the Aussie army from the end of the Korean War until ~1975 or so?

    I’m looking for general equipment lists & numbers (tanks, APCs, heavy trucks, artillery, crew-served medium weapons & individual weapons), general troop numbers & unit organizations… the kind of info you need to work out what might have been done differently if priorities had changed or different “buy from/work with” policies had been in place.

    I don’t need exact info, just “~x of tank model XYZ were purchased between 195V and 196L to equip N armor companies” kind of thing.

    in reply to: RAN Selection of MH-60R #2029781
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Of course, if the Italians had convinced you guys that they could easily fit that gun (and improve the “H&H” capacity), both you & the Turks would have the same attack helo.

    in reply to: Largest aircraft on and off a carrier? #1021747
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The 727 part derives from USN studies in the early 1960s on the feasibility of using a supercarrier for emergency landing of a crippled airliner at sea.

    It was determined that the short-body models of 727 were the largest jet with any possibility of succeeding.

    in reply to: Largest aircraft on and off a carrier? #1029436
    Bager1968
    Participant

    The 727 part derives from USN studies in the early 1960s on the feasibility of using a supercarrier for emergency landing of a crippled airliner at sea.

    It was determined that the short-body models of 727 were the largest jet with any possibility of succeeding.

    in reply to: First sightings #1021751
    Bager1968
    Participant

    1966, summer.

    The summer I turned 5, standing in the yard of our house north-west of Reno, Nv., looking up at the white lines in the sky, and learning they were made by “big flying cars, carrying people to distant places (that explanation may have come earlier, I’m not sure..

    Definitely that summer, learning that those booms were made by military planes flying faster than sound.

    And again that year or later, visiting my mother’s brother in Denver, Colorado… he lived a few blocks from Stapelton International Airport (at that time Colorado’s largest airport). Watching the jets take off & land.

    in reply to: First sightings #1029441
    Bager1968
    Participant

    1966, summer.

    The summer I turned 5, standing in the yard of our house north-west of Reno, Nv., looking up at the white lines in the sky, and learning they were made by “big flying cars, carrying people to distant places (that explanation may have come earlier, I’m not sure..

    Definitely that summer, learning that those booms were made by military planes flying faster than sound.

    And again that year or later, visiting my mother’s brother in Denver, Colorado… he lived a few blocks from Stapelton International Airport (at that time Colorado’s largest airport). Watching the jets take off & land.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2030718
    Bager1968
    Participant

    How does a lump of metal catch fire?

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-15540534

    Not a “lump of metal”, but a fan… and fans have electric motors, and electric motors catch fire all the time!

    Fife Constabulary said no-one was injured in the fire, which was traced to an extractor fan.

    Since it was also described as “a piece of welding equipment “, said fan is a portable unit, and will have been brought in to ventilate the compartment during the welding.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 3,360 total)