dark light

Bager1968

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 3,360 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Carrier launch weight #2010183
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Predictable, but anyways:

    US puts F-35 STOVL variant on two-year probation
    http://www.janes.com/news/defence/air/jdw/jdw110110_1_n.shtml

    Presidential debt-reduction commission will propose canceling the short-takeoff-and-landing (STOVL) version of the F-35 fighter under development for the U.S. Marines.
    http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=5152759&c=AME&s=TOP

    First link… OLD NEWS, from 1 1/2 months ago, and well-discussed around here.

    Second link… OLDER NEWS, from 2 1/2 months ago… and NONE of that commission’s recommendations have made it anywhere except into the trash.

    in reply to: First production model F-35 flies, video here #2334462
    Bager1968
    Participant

    No, it can’t.

    It can’t do anything that it hasn’t been seen doing by every person who posts on the internet from a foreign country.

    We haven’t seen it carry LGBs and drop them, so obviously it can’t do that.

    We haven’t seen an F-35C actually performing an arrested landing or catapulted take-off either, so obviously it can’t do that, to the USN’s severe disappointment.

    in reply to: Miracle On The Hudson Plane Museum Bound #1104616
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Funny Peter they did say on the Documentary that if the ditch switch had been thrown the rear doors would not have submerged as the water coming in through the damage to the rear fuselage so she would have floated for hours on flat water as the ditch switch opens vents so flooding can be contained and spread over the whole fuselage underfloor.

    curlyboy

    The only thing allowing water to spread into the forward underfloor spaces would have done is to reduce the forward flotation, thus reducing the flotation of the whole aircraft, and likely making it sink faster…. the skin damage to the lower rear fuselage was far too extensive to prevent the flooding aft.

    Here is a pic which shows the skin damage… yes, the tail has been unbolted, but look lower.

    http://i.pbase.com/o6/74/859174/1/109719455.iNdN1Muj.image009.jpg

    http://i.pbase.com/o6/74/859174/1/109719455.iNdN1Muj.image009.jpg

    Here is the whole sequence. Note the intact skin on the underside of the forward section:

    http://www.pbase.com/sergeanttim/flight_1549_rolls_to_teterboro

    in reply to: The Spitfires down a Australian Mine Story gets a Reprise #1105370
    Bager1968
    Participant

    In February 1946 more than 550 planes from all over the world were stored at Oakey waiting to be scrapped, including 50 Mustangs, 240 Kittyhawks and 225 Spitfires.

    They were eventually bought by a Sydney scrap dealer who built a smelter on the site.

    Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/228717/Race-to-uncover-6m-Spitfire-hidden-in-crateRace-to-uncover-6m-Spitfire-hidden-in-crate#ixzz1F39sEp73

    …..

    His research has shown discrepancies between the number of planes disposed of and those that were on the base at the end of the war.

    Read more: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/228717/Race-to-uncover-6m-Spitfire-hidden-in-crateRace-to-uncover-6m-Spitfire-hidden-in-crate#ixzz1F3A3i2nZ

    Wasn’t 1946-50 the era when lots of aircraft “from various sources, some unknown”, including spitfires, were showing up in Israel?

    I would look through their records first.

    in reply to: Space Shuttle – Just a Suggestion #1106687
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Obviously all the Space Shuttles will end up in US museums, and rightly so, but what would it take to convince NASA to pop one on the back of their Boeing 747 transporter and fly her to the UK, or indeed how about a world tour? Just a suggestion!

    Considering the recent cuts in NASA’s budget, you’ll have to pay 100% of the costs… including salaries of the personnel involved, etc.

    in reply to: Carrier launch weight #2010887
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Carriers which do not have big catapults capable of giving a heavy airplane the end speed it needs can compensate by increasing ship’s speed to increase wind over deck. The catapult officer has a chart he uses to set catapult operating parameters for each airplane he launches based on airplane weight and WOD.

    The landing signals officer does the same for the arresting gear. It is set according to the airplane’s landing weight and landing speed.

    Up to the limit of the ship’s maximum speed, then there is not a d@mn thing more they can do, now is there?

    in reply to: How navies can more effectively combat Somali pirates #2010888
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Somalia is a Muslim country, and many of its more “active” populace are sympathetic to the more radical factions of Islam.

    The Americans were traveling with their cargo bins full of Bibles to give out.

    There was a general concern that this might anger the “pirates” and lead to a tragedy like this.

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #4, Cachorro-quente! #2339082
    Bager1968
    Participant

    We would wrangle over their decision of course 🙂

    With various posters agonizing over “their” aircraft having lost, and expounding how those who made the decisions are complete idiots who know nothing about what they are doing, and how any teenage student could have made a better choice (picked their aircraft).

    Then will come the accusations of bribery and improper political pressure, etc.

    This will be whether Rafale, NG Gripen, or F/A-18E/F wins… the only difference will be which posters are throwing the temper tantrum.

    in reply to: Sea Gripen or Sea Typhoon? #2339121
    Bager1968
    Participant

    12 pilots… how many were in a RN Harrier squadron?

    http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/local/east-hampshire/speculation_mounting_over_carrier_fighter_jet_1_1255750

    Speculation mounting over carrier fighter jet

    Published on Thu Aug 19 10:51:41 BST 2010

    Royal Navy pilots have been sent to America to train on catapult-launched fighter jets – prompting speculation the cheaper aircraft will be bought for the new Portsmouth-based carriers.

    …..

    The MoD has confirmed a group of 12 Royal Navy pilots will undergo training with the US Marine Corps over the next eight years – including training on the catapult-launched F-18 fighter jets.

    …..

    Portsmouth South MP Mike Hancock, who sits on the Commons defence committee, said: ‘It’s been a long time since British ships had catapult launched fighters so pilots would need training if that’s the direction we’re heading. There are a lot of unanswered questions.

    in reply to: Rafales for Brasil #4, Cachorro-quente! #2339954
    Bager1968
    Participant

    For Taygibay:

    http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b336/Bager1968/other%20stuff/USSReliantinNewportNewsdrydock.jpg

    in reply to: Military Aviation News From Around The World – VII #2341433
    Bager1968
    Participant

    A little ironic that Ukraine would be upset about that. 😉

    Um… the shipyard that built both Varyag and the Russian Kuznetsov is in the Ukraine… so the place where the documents were stored was in the Ukraine. That’s why he was tried and sent to prison in the Ukraine… he violated Ukrainian law.

    The person is a Russian citizen, that’s all.

    in reply to: TORNADO DOWN #2341436
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Oh, I understand that.

    I just never saw the reasoning behind it… their egos are so small they need to claim someone else’s work as their own?

    in reply to: TORNADO DOWN #2341922
    Bager1968
    Participant

    I never remove copyrights… why should I?

    Similarly, I try to give credit to anyone whose information or posts I pass on… its only polite.

    in reply to: Carrier ops #1116295
    Bager1968
    Participant

    Victorious was re-engined in the 1950s with Foster-Wheeler boilers, one of the reasons for delays and cost increases as it was a late decision. Were these also 400psi?

    My material shows those as 440 psi, so a slight increase.

    in reply to: Carrier ops #1116301
    Bager1968
    Participant

    While the 150′ C11-2 was the shortest USN steam catapult, the RN had the BS4, which was shorter yet:

    BS4…..103ft…160ft…40,000lb@78kt…Mod Majestic, Hermes 1959
    …………………………..30,000lb@110kt

    BS4M…112ft…169ft…?……………………Melbourne 1971+

    BS4C …139ft…175ft…35,000lb@99kt…Centaur 1958

    The extra 9 feet in HMAS Melbourne’s stroke length was added in 1971 when she was fitted with a bridle catcher extension… the end of the piston assembly was relocated from the forward end of the flight deck into the “horn” of the bridle catcher.

    Note in the second pair of photos how close to the bow the catapult track ends.

    http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b336/Bager1968/Carriers/catapult%20and%20arresting%20gear%20systems/fabrication2.gif

    http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b336/Bager1968/Carriers/catapult%20and%20arresting%20gear%20systems/piecingtogether2.gif

    http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b336/Bager1968/Carriers/Canadian%20-%20Australian%20carriers/hmas_melbourne_nick_damato_2.jpg

    http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b336/Bager1968/Carriers/Canadian%20-%20Australian%20carriers/melbourne-flagship.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 3,360 total)