Guess it’s this one http://www.lerosactive.com/main/diving-tourism-leros/heinkel-111.html
Maybe this is of any help…
“The DH.53 Humming Bird, painted in its original colors at shown at the Lympne competition in 1923.”
http://fly.historicwings.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/HighFlight-Hummingbird6.jpg
Don’t know if this caption is reliable…
You can find the word Masseloid in this book: Manual on Document Reproduction and Selection on page 101
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fwO4UIJi6RgC&q=masseloid&dq=masseloid&hl=en&sa=X&ei=M-3MUvLMDMjNtQaP4ICwBg&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAA
Martin
I’ve thought to do it – you’ve done it! 😉
Haven’t read them, have both found with bookfinder dot com:
Fred Adkin “From the Ground Up. A History of R.A.F. Ground Crew”
Fred Adkin “Through the Hangar Doors RAF Ground Crew Since 1945”
Found it! Photo on here –
Guess the “Duran Duran” photo shows N150RC – you can find in the www other photos of the same plane chartered by “Aerosmith”, “Rod Stewart” and “The Police”
Martin
So am I right in saying there were different designs of these tanks? If you compare Scorpion’s picture above of XT661 (in which the tank seems to wrap around the wing) with the one of the Duran Duran tour plane –
http://www.theguardian.com/music/gallery/2013/dec/10/duranduran-photography#/?picture=424536164&index=5 in which they seem more flush to the top of the wing. Simple progression or a difference between military and civil standards?
Both types on civil used ac
Type I http://www.airliners.net/photo/Philippine-Airlines/Vickers-784D-Viscount/0134499/L/&sid=ab0d6bf23148ec871d8d6b5f3cf2717d
Type II http://www.aussieairliners.org/viscount-inter/dot%20canada/0128.018.html
I’m not sure how generic it was but certainly the NZ NAC Viscounts (type 807) still had the plumbing in place for the tanks to be fitted.
In the case of ZK-BRF both ends of the lines are blanked off but obviously ready to be connected. In the under wing skins one can see the attachments for the tanks blanked off with rubber plugs.
The lines ran from the wing bays aft of the outer engines into the flap bays where they terminated at the under wing skin (in the fwd of these bays they would have interconnected with other plumbing by way, I assume, by replacement of one piece of plumbing which passes through the fwd bay and which the end of the line to the flap bay terminates nearby).
hth
“Much correspondence has flowed regarding slipper tanks on Viscount aircraft recently. In our previous Newsletter the focus was on NZNAC – New Zealand National Airways Corporation having the fittings but in fact the Corporation’s V.807s never had the actual tanks fitted, even during the delivery flights, as indicated on ZK-BRF’s above photo.”
http://www.vickersviscount.net/newsletters/Newsletter1110.aspx
Here is a nice image of Viscount XT575
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nog59/7973674776/sizes/l/in/photostream/
PLUNA viscount CX-AQN had slipper tanks on her ferry flight to Uruguay 13th May 1958
[ATTACH=CONFIG]224220[/ATTACH]
(from a newspaper clip sent by Wilman Fuentes LAAHS Uruguay)
Martin
To confuse things even more, I-TITI was also on a Piper Comanche! (W/O in 1969) Viva Italia!
flyingant do you have an image of the Piper?
It’s a bit irritating – now I found a Hungarian website http://horac.freeweb.hu/talalat.php?GTA=t201
If you scroll down to HA-NAN, there is a Jancsó-Szegedy M-24, and the caption stated I-TITI and Milan!
edit: finally here is an image of MUEGVETEMY M. 24 I-TITI
http://www.museoscienza.org/dipartimenti/catalogo_collezioni/images/07556_dia.jpg
edit 2.: the registration no I-TITI is fictious! never appeared in the Italian Aviation Registry