dark light

ALBERT ROSS

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 2,462 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dawlish Carnival #526860
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Rob, what happened to the AAC Historic Flight and the “Blue Eagles”? Maybe Airfix could use your shot to promote this set :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Alberta Aviation Museum…have you visited us? #1299260
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Hi Tom,

    I visited you in April 1993 when you were just gathering aircraft from two collections and were not yet open to the public. I wrote an article on your plans and collection that was published in Aeroplane Monthly magazine. I am absolutely amazed and full of admiration at what you have achieved since then. There has certainly been no dust settling over the past 14 years and I wholeheartedly recommend anyone in the Edmonton area to visit your excellent achievements.

    Adrian

    in reply to: Blackburn Beverleys in 1952. #1299262
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Interesting, thanks for posting those. Amazingly, XL149 was one of the last surviving Beverleys that was preserved in the RAF Finningley collection during the early ’80s, they finally got scrapped and the cockpit survives with the Newark Air Museum.

    That Concorde shot was taken at Fairford.

    in reply to: Taking pictures at Duxford #527110
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Left? I heard he was banned for not agreeing with a mod!

    Great shame!

    Yet again!! That’s a hell of a lot of posts to delete!!:eek:

    in reply to: Please help me get sharp photos!! #453411
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    No.

    Moggy, infinity should be used as a far value when working with hyperfocal distance.

    Exactly….and how often are aircraft actually far enough away to be at ‘infinity’?

    in reply to: XR537 G-NATY – Permit to Fly (merged) #1305587
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    We are looking at smokebox options.
    Most of the old RAFAT Gnats used part of the fuel compartment to store the diesel which used up a lot of fuel room. With the decommissioning of most of the old comms, there’s plenty of room in the body behind seat 2 to put a smoke generation system which will probably be the easier option and more effective option. Just a case of looking at who offers what.

    Might be worth contacting Kemble to see what smoke system is fitted to their ‘Yellowjack’ Gnat ‘XR991′(G-MOUR)?

    in reply to: Bristol 170 c/n 13160 #1308162
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    It might be timely to mention that a brand new book on the Bristol Freighter is about to be published by Air-Britain, to which I have supplied many photos. It should be ‘the Bristol Freighter bible’ and something to look out for! 😉

    in reply to: Dayglo Paint #1315467
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant
    in reply to: Air Atlantique Acquires Third Rapide! #1323290
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Will,

    Many thanks for that. Good to meet you at Old Warden last month and shame Rapide ‘GTM went sick! On Saturday, will the Rapide giving the flights be ‘IDL in its new military markings?

    in reply to: RIAT Arrivals #529804
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Thanks very much Paul (PMN) and others for your constructive and helpful comments and suggestions. Having been shooting Kodachrome slides for 40 years, I have only recently gone digital, so it is a whole new ballgame.
    If I had posted my pics on the ‘Tutorial’ pic and asked for comments/suggestions, I would have expected some, but I just posted unaltered pics very quickly on this thread,just to show a few arrivals, without even tweaking and adjusting colours etc. Some of those that posted negative or childish comments are those that like to put post their pics so they can receive praise for them (but that’s all they receive!) and they believe they are Gods gift to aviation photography! What these people don’t realise is that many readers know these people and their credibility and respect goes down with every posting! I would like to see their efforts before the digital revolution!! The exposure you made on the day was in the hands of the processing lab and you had no influence on it once you made that exposure. Photography in those days WAS skill and I am pleased a still have a vast collection of perfect Kodachrome slides that don’t need ‘sharpening’, ‘colour adjusting’, ‘cropping’, ‘photoshopping’ and overall changing the image as taken by me!!

    in reply to: Old Airshow Programmes #1243004
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    I regretfully have only kept IAT/RIAT and Farnborough show programmes over years, but would like to have any Biggin Hill Air Fair or RNAS Yeovilton show programmes between 1963-69 if anyone is disposing of these?

    in reply to: RIAT Arrivals #531008
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Well it’s not quite level :p

    Thanks Damien…and I was beginning to think you were adding constructive advice? The horizon’s level, though.:D If that’s all that’s wrong, then maybe I have redeemed myself. The rest taken on Wednesday are all the same quality.

    in reply to: RIAT Arrivals #531041
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Well, I only posted a few quick shots to start off a RIAT arrivals thread, but obviously it’s not worth posting any more after the debate it’s started. 😡 Others that post here spend time in Photoshop making their images just perfect,before uploading, which I could have done if I had more time. Enjoy the show at the weekend if you are going.

    in reply to: Yeovilton Photocall 6th July #531045
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Thank you Albert.

    Also some of us are limited in that we abide by the normal conventions of paying to see a show or an event rather than choosing to, in many cases, trespass onto adjoining land to save a bob or two.

    Regards,

    kev35

    You won’t let it rest, Kev, will you?:mad: Even while advising Rob about photography, you have to have a dig at those of us that were in the field!
    Well for your information, no one was ‘trespassing’ as you accused us! In fact Avon & Somerset police came into the field to tell us the farmer was quite happy for us to be there, providing no litter was left and his access gates were not blocked!
    Furthermore, if we are not ‘trespassing’, then it’s just a matter of choice.
    Those outside do not want to take into-sun shots for most of the day, nor do they consider £20 is good value to shoot aircraft in a static park that are already surrounded by fences with most having covers over them. The show is not run by the Royal Navy, but farmed out to a private agency that is more interested in making money for itself than looking after enthusiasts’ requirements. It has little to do with ‘ saving a few pounds’ or ‘supporting the event’, as the Photocall costs next to nothing and all the punters on the show day will easily cover the costs and more. It is about ‘value for money’.
    If they were really taking enthusiasts seriously, they would not put covers on the aircraft or put the the barriers up until afterwards, like they have done several years earlier.

    in reply to: Yeovilton Photocall 6th July #531343
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Which ones do you think are OOF, Kev?

    It’s worth pointing out, though, that because of the zoom limitation, flying ones are using near maximum zoom, so there is obviously some degredation because of that, if you try to zoom in post processing which may involve some heavy cropping, resulting in a loss of resolution. If they’re fast, they tend to be further away!

    Rob,

    They’re not OOF, but all the fixedwing aircraft are slightly blurred. I think this is caused by not having a high-enough shutter-speed. It’s difficult to have a compromise between ‘prop blur’ and pin-sharp photos, but in my book the latter has to have priority and with jets there’s no contest .;)

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 2,462 total)