dark light

ALBERT ROSS

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,276 through 1,290 (of 2,462 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Yeovilton Photo Call Day #483850
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    This has been a problem ever since the move to a September date – just not enough daylight left to do the job properly.

    We have complained about this before, charging to go into a photocall at 1700 in September is ridiculous! How about suggesting to them that it’s moved to May or June, so there is plenty of daylight and it doesn’t clash with RIAT or Farnborough? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Archangel Airshow – Tanagra #483914
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Any more? I heard there was a fantastic low beat-up by A-7s, F-4s, F-16s and Mirage 2000s? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Comet to fly ? #1382367
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Did someone ask for a flying Comet? How’s about two?

    From this thread a while back.

    More info in the thread.

    Ahh, De Havilland! I remember it well – 29th July 1992. I shared this trip with James and made Aircraft Illustrated’s front cover in October 1992 + article and more photos inside, if anyone has that issue.

    in reply to: Hunter XF382 #1389417
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    So, you first visited when you were three! There’s an enthusiast for you. :diablo:

    😉

    Exactly! It just shows this is a load of bolony! At North Weald there is a Saudi Strikemaster that FLIES in full Saudi livery and another with IWM at Duxford, BOTH with the Saudi flag on the tail! Please tell MAM as this is just ridiculous that it’s one rule for one and another for someone else. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 – The Rebuild Begins…… #1393964
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Well personally I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, I hope if/when it does take to the air your flying pigs will be happy to fly in formation with XH558, and that you have plenty of salt to hand to go with your edible hat 🙂

    Yes, quite agree! Don’t get me wrong, I would just love to see it flying in an all-white scheme, but the odds are just too great. Okay, they get it in the air….then what? Air shows can’t afford to have it and anyway, the plan is to fly it for one season(IF they can afford the fuel and insurance) and then ground it at Duxford. The whole idea is ludicrous! I would much rather the lottery money was sent to New Orleans!

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 – The Rebuild Begins…… #1393987
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Sorry these guys were/are prepared to appear on TV, and say that their project will be flyhing within 12 months, they seem to have cleared many hurdles to get this far, and were very convincing.

    So what makes you think that it won’t be gracing the skies this time next year, are you party to something the rest of us aren’t ? Or is it pure conjecture.

    Nope, I’m just party to all the hundreds of threads that say it won’t. I’m a realist and the odds are too great! They haven’t raised the balance in order to get the lottery money, the engineering skills are monumental, the fuel costs, the insurance costs. How many air shows are going to be able to afford it? Just read all the other threads by realists and make your own mind up! 😎

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 – The Rebuild Begins…… #1394018
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    So for what reason should I disbelieve them, after all it’s not April the first.

    It wasn’t April 1st when Herman Goering said “No enemy aircraft will ever fly over the Reich Territory”. Nor was it April 1st when ‘Comical Ali’ said “Iraq was winning the war in 1991”. Do you want more examples? 😀

    in reply to: Andover in Russian colours! #1394136
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    This was G-ARRV,the Andover prototype which was a conversion of the the Avro 748 prototype G-APZV.A sad end for a very historic airframe.When is a 748 going to be preseved in this country?

    Here she is!

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 – The Rebuild Begins…… #1394167
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Sorry to drag this out of the archive, but there were two chaps interviewed on our local TV station, a Sqd Ldr and a Dr, who reckon that XH558 will be in the air by this time next year and gracing the skies over St Aubin’s Bay, Jersey on September 14 2006. That’ll please the present Mrs EN830, it will be our 15th Wedding Anniversary and I’ve already told her that I am having the Red Sparrows brought over especially.

    :rolleyes: Ah, right!

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1394187
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    While this is an interesting thread with some very good low flying pix, I’m not too sure that aircraft that are actually landing really qualify. Similarly for aircraft that are taking off but have been “held down” by the pilot until the end of the runway.

    Anybody else feel this way?

    .

    Low is low! If an aircraft apparently only makes it on to the end of the runway, he is TOO LOW! Would you like to drive a double-decker bus along that road when that Phantom was landing? If a shot makes you gasp, it’s worth posting! 😮

    in reply to: XP688 lost in the depths(literally) of Lancashire #1394540
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Thanks for posting the pic of XP688 in much happier times Albert.

    I think the Macaws embelishments that adorned quite a few Manby JP4’s in the 60’s and 70’s was the best the RAF made of the tacky red / white /grey scheme.

    I,ve done a bit of research into the colour schemes that JP’s wore through their service life, consensus is that the original overall bare metal / silver was universally hated by the groundcrews, they apparently they had to rub the whole airframe down with a kind of Brasso to maintain the finish, on a regular basis!
    The second overall light aircraft grey was much more popular ,but the dayglo self adhesive strips were prone to severe fading in sunlight making the aircraft look very tatty very quickly.
    Hence the final red/white scheme which we were subjected to for decades, and which annoyingly still adorn a vast majority of JP’s.
    XS186 will be re-painted shortly , in her second service(1965 – 1968) scheme of light aircraft grey with (painted) dayglo and College of Air Warfare insignia…. sweet !
    Photo’s to follow.

    Lovely…you mean like this? The light grey was only applied between 1967-68 and not all JPs were finished like this, with most going from silver & dayglo into the red/white/grey scheme.

    in reply to: Hunter XF382 #1394572
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    What’s wrong with that? I read somewhere that the Saudi government only allowed the Lightnings to be displayed in museums with the guarantee that they weren’t repainted in Saudi colours, is this why?

    …so what colours is it in, then? :confused:

    in reply to: Hunter XF382 #1394727
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Yes i know there is 2 lightnings Les ! sorry i was refering to the F6 !! The T55 is in quite good shape and just needs light touching up and probably a clean by now !!!!

    …AND the Saudi flag painted on the tail!!! 😡

    in reply to: Handover/bac1-11 #1394737
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    Anyone else other than whom? Both operated by ETPS/QinetiQ from Boscombe Down.

    in reply to: XP688 lost in the depths(literally) of Lancashire #1396459
    ALBERT ROSS
    Participant

    This is very sad! In memorium to XP688, here is a photo I took of it when it was part of the College of Air Warfare “Macaws” aerobatic team at Abingdon in September 1971. I would have loved to have saved this machine and put it on a pole in my front garden painted in these markings! :rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 1,276 through 1,290 (of 2,462 total)