dark light

DC Page

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 312 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The MIG's at Fairford 1993 #943549
    DC Page
    Participant

    DK, Thanks for the correct pilot names and update. I have corrected my post above.

    Here is a picture (not mine) of Beschastonov still in his seat after it has left the aircraft. The stabilization booms are deployed (They deploy before the seat has completely left the rails) and the initiation lanyard is trailing from the bottom of the seat. I would estimate that this photo was taken about 2 seconds before yours.
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=211769&stc=1&d=1359301921

    in reply to: The MIG's at Fairford 1993 #944098
    DC Page
    Participant

    twisterkev,

    Thanks for posting your footage, it’s amazing that 20 years later I’m still seeing new pictures and video of this event. I heard that the only injury was one of the Belgian C-130 crew who twisted or broke an ankle jumping off (sliding down the side) of the C-130 as ericmunk has mentioned.

    David Kavangh’s picture is a great capture and shows Alexander Beschastonov’s Zvezda K-36 ejection seat just after man/seat separation. It is upside down directly above the main fireball and you can see the drogue chute directly above the seat. Beschastonov would be just out of frame at the top left of this picture. Sergey Tresvyatsky’s MiG lost most of its left wing and rolled onto its back and he ejected straight down. If you put a stopwatch to the accident footage you’ll see that he initiated ejection about 3.1 seconds after impact. He got out first and saw Beschastonov’s MiG in a fireball. Beschastonov was in the middle of the fireball and couldn’t see his orientation so he pulled the loud handle because he knew he was low, rolling, and on fire, and things weren’t likely to get any better.

    I’ve got some great footage of Tresvyatsky on the ground with his helmet on his left arm and as soon as he steps out of his harness he reaches down to one of the pockets in the left leg of his flight suit and pulls out a cigarette and lights it up. (His hands weren’t even shaking!) Then he looked around like he was looking for Alexander.

    Several years ago I heard that one of the pilots involved in the Fairford accident had died in a crash while testing a Russian civilian aircraft. I’ve not been able to find any details regarding this. Does anyone know more?

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=211757&stc=1&d=1359262031

    in reply to: Jim Wallwork RIP WW2 Glider pilot #944215
    DC Page
    Participant

    Blue skies Mr. Wallwork.

    I wonder if one of the gliders in this picture is his? What an amazing feat.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Pegasus_Bridge_1944.jpg

    in reply to: Luftwaffe USAAF bomber rammers – April 1945 missions #1016717
    DC Page
    Participant

    The animated series “Dogfights” which aired on the History Channel in 2007 and 2008 can be found online and in Season 2 Episode 2 they interview German and American pilots and aircrew who were involved in some of the ramming incidents. Very interesting and very good animations that recreate some of those events.

    The title is Dogfights: The Luftwaffe’s Deadliest Mission – S02E02

    in reply to: Cockpit identification #1017007
    DC Page
    Participant

    That picture is the cockpit of Curtis C-46 “Maid in Japan” N54514, owned by Everts Air Cargo. I recognized the radio stack. It’s also a fairly modern upgrade and not at all like the Commando was in the field.

    For reference here is the KC-97 and as was mentioned, is much roomier, rounder, and more glass. The C-46 is very pointed compared to most of the larger flight decks.http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=208835&stc=1&d=1349696592

    in reply to: Is this a Blenheim Mk V? #1017023
    DC Page
    Participant

    Paul I think you were correct in your initial assessment. I believe it is a Blenheim. When I play with the levels in Photoshop the glass topped nose in front of the cockpit stands out and the tall turret in the rear is exactly where it should be on the Blenheim. The picture is so low res I can’t get much detail from it, but I can easily take a vintage black and white image and blur it down to look exactly like your image. I know you said you didn’t win the picture but is that the highest resolution you can provide? With just a little more resolution we should be able to see the antenna mast between the cockpit and the top turret. Also the engines on the Blenheim can appear more underslung in low light or dark images, and I think that is what is happening here. I don’t know anything about what units flew it when or where, but I don’t see anything visually that can disqualify this as being a Blenheim. With just a little more resolution it would be easy to say for sure.

    in reply to: Mystery B-17 accident at Grafton Underwood #1047361
    DC Page
    Participant

    I have listings for all 3 aircraft but they all show actions after their accidents at Grafton Underwood. That doesn’t seem likely from the description of the crash he witnessed. And 42-37789 is listed as a post-maintenance test flight with at least a surviving pilot. Probably not a full crew on board that one.

    in reply to: 1st to land on ship WW1 #1049185
    DC Page
    Participant

    Here is a link from 2011 regarding Eugene Ely’s first landing aboard a ship and the 100th anniversary of naval aviation. Some interesting pictures.

    http://telstarlogistics.typepad.com/telstarlogistics/2011/01/the-100th-anniversary-of-marine-aviation.html

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1058670
    DC Page
    Participant

    It may not be the lowest, but it sure looks like fun.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDeIrdk7f4s&playnext=1&list=PL05A8634CAC28B5F2&

    in reply to: WW2 Info on Jap strike at Pearl Harbour #1066141
    DC Page
    Participant

    All 5 of the Japanese midget subs have been accounted for.

    Number #18 was located by the U.S. Navy over 50 years ago outside the harbor entrance and was returned to Japan where it is on display at a Naval Academy. It had been sunk by a depth charge and never fired its torpedoes.

    Number #19 ran aground and was captured in 1941 and was taken on a tour of the United States to raise money for war bonds. It is still on display in the U.S.

    Number #20 was attacked by the USS Ward and hit by her deck gun before the Japanese air attack started on the morning of December 7th. It was able to escape and sunk outside the harbor. It was found a decade ago.

    Number #22 made it into the harbor and fired both torpedoes but they are believed to have missed their intended targets. It was sunk in the harbor during the battle with its 2 crewmen. It was dug up and moved a few times but is still buried at Pearl with the crew.

    And just a few years ago the 5th and final missing sub was positively identified mixed in amongst other U.S. Navy wreckage outside of the harbor. The torpedo tubes were both empty and it is believed that this sub made it into the harbor and fired both torpedoes. It is thought that the sub then made it to a quiet part of the west loch and was scuttled by its crew. In 1944 that area of Pearl had a large fleet of LSTs that were being prepared for the invasion of the Marianas and somehow an explosion occurred that set off fuel and ammunition stores and sank several of the LSTs and killed and wounded hundreds of sailors. During the salvage operations to clear the loch they recovered the scuttled fifth midget sub and hauled it away and dumped it with the other wreckage from the LSTs, a few miles outside of Pearl. This disaster was classified until 1960 so the public didn’t know about it during the war and it was largely forgotten. The stern section of the sub was found about 20 years ago, and was probably severed from the rest of the sub by its scuttling charge. The remaining pieces were found more recently, and it still lies on the bottom a few miles from Pearl Harbor.

    in reply to: P51 old crow – has it moved to the uk? #1068890
    DC Page
    Participant

    Which “Old Crow” is at Shoreham? The silver P-51D or the green P-51B with the Malcolm hood? Or are there others painted as “Old Crow”?

    in reply to: Superjet down in Indonesia #540711
    DC Page
    Participant

    I’m not sure how significant the following pics will be, nevertheless they appear to show the Terrain Avoidance Warning System (TAWS) indicating a fault and switched off. They were taken several hours before the ill fated flight:

    That picture also shows left and right generators off because they are connected to ground power. Note the EXT PWR switch shows AVAL and ON. This is what you would expect to see when the jet is sitting on the tarmac. Most systems are powered down at this point. Normal.

    in reply to: 5th Air Force B-17E Armed Transport #1013484
    DC Page
    Participant

    The B-17 Flying Fortress Story by Freeman and Osborne shows this info:

    41-2408 Del Salt Lake SAD 8/1/41; ass 40BS/19BG; used in Gen MacArthur rescue attempt 25/3/42; ass 43RS/ Wheeler; sal 14/10/44

    41-2665 Del Minneapolis 7/3/42; ass 93BS/19BG Hawaii 14/5/42; tran 6SR Clark Fd, Philippines. LULU

    in reply to: C-FETB Touches down at Trenton, Ontario #1017837
    DC Page
    Participant

    Here’s a great picture from 1998 of C-FETB in the hangar at Quebec. Check out the snout on that bird! What engine/prop combination was that?

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Pratt-&-Whitney/Boeing-720-023B/0084108/L/

    in reply to: Fatal Hawker Hunter Crash in the US #1018511
    DC Page
    Participant

    That is the Hunter lost yesterday at Point Mugu. (N321AX)

    Here is an interesting clip of Mark Hanna demonstrating the Hunter.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGl7onm34Gg&feature=related

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 312 total)