Grey Area
This thread is indeed about Cuba. US policy has been basically consistant from the first days of Castro’s dictatorship. When Castro dies the Cubans will become democrates in a matter of days and US policy will change. Not hard to understand.
As to supporting dictatorships, every major western power has supported dictators of one brand or another, at one time or another, for one reason or another. We all agree on that issue so why try and extend the issue elsewhere? (at least Chile is now democratic– not so Cuba).
Castro is a communist. He choose the wrong side during the cold war. He did his best to bring the cold war into the western hemisphere. I am quite content that he didn’t succeed.
Why are you so keen to pick a fight with U.S. members about Cuba? The U.S. regarded every communist regime as a target during the cold war and given the fact that communism is dead and billions are now better off, lets be happy. Lets be thankfull we don’t live in Cuba. We can go there on a holiday by choice. We get to exercise our choices everyday in ways Cubans do not.
Cubans who fled to the US are not fanatics
Snowman
Glad to see you agree about the namecalling. Referring to President Bush as a ‘Shrub (and worse) is quite common here. There have been many rather nonsensical rants on this forum but most have been directed at the US unfortunately. I do agree with most of your last post.
I notice that you reference the ”massive amount of goodwill’ toward the US after 9/11. You ask where did it go? Indeed I have heard this remark many times. It is a favourate comment of the idealists and the media types. Perhaps it went away because it was never all that massive in the first place? Perhaps it went away when it became clear that the U.S. wasn’t going to play the victim very long. In any event, rather than resign itself to living with the terrorism and treating 9/11 as as crime to be dealt with by the police, the U.S. elected to use the military. Perhaps that was the moment when the support waned because it illustrated U.S. millitary power could do what Europe can no longer do.
Regards
Sauron
John
Looks like the gang here would all vote for Castro if they could. To bad they don’t have elections in Cuba (even for the Cubans). Do you notice how they love dictatorships? From afar that is. :rolleyes:
Regards
sauron
News flash!
Due to the harsh new travel restrictions taken by the US , hundreds of thousands of former Cubans are fleeing Florida in leaky boats and seeking haven in the Casto’s Cuba. One man interviewed just before climbing into a tube raft said, “I would rather risk jail in Cuba than to live in my beachfront condo in Miami Beach one day longer under that dictator Bush!” 😉
Sauron
Looks like the same article posted three times to me. :confused:
Sauron
Very nice. Thanks
Sauron
Steve.
As I understand it they have had fuel line leaks, tail roter cracks, cracking windscreens and console brackets, airframe cracks and hoist issues. No doubt most of these issues will be solved but the CAF has expressed some disapointment.
Regards
Sauron
The right size for the ships, the right price, the right industrial needs, not to mention the fact that the Merlin has quality issues. It would hardly be the first time we operated more than one large type.
Sauron
It would appear that the major issues are because of the RR engines. :rolleyes:
Sauron
Politics did play a role starting in the late 80’s when a contract was let to replace all the SAR and Navy Sea Kings and Labs with the HE-101 which as Arthur said was cancelled by our Liberal government when it came to power. It cost the taxpayers $500 million so that the Liberals could play the hero.
Later, they did purchase 15 Merlins for SAR as was said. There have been a number of reliability/quality issues with it as we know.
It would appear that the deal for the H-92 is a good one so the government gets to save a little face.
As to which is better, the Merlin or the Superhawk? Time will tell but there is no reason to believe the H-92 will not give good service. As to Canada being a launch customer? Well, someone has to be first. The Merlin also had a first customer. If Sikorsky got the order because of the economic benefits to Canada then that’s fine with me.
Sauron
Sauron
Yes, the Su-25 would be far more effective against the defenceless tribes in the south. On the otherhand, the Mig would be better against a UN (NATO, EU?) intervention. 😮
Sauron
Dutchy
I have been away for some time and my reaction is the same as yours. The “old forum” as you put it was just fine. A forum is a meeting place as you suggest.
Sauron
Arthur
Funny stuff. A bit paranoid but funny. Got to go now a wash by sheet for tonights meeting. 😮
Sauron
Well, what ever the EU is, it’s a bureaucratic monstrosity. Talk about poor voter turnout. Maybe its understandable. Who cares about voting for an organization where no one is sure who is in charge about what. :confused:
Sauron
It is possible that the IAF aircraft will stop at Gander but Goose Bay would be more likely.
Sauron
Geforce
Europes military may not match that of the US in technical abilities but they are far from crap and are certainly capable of protecting peoples homes without violating UN rules of engagement I would hope. I agree they can’t eliminate ethnic hatred or disarm everyone.
I would prefer to leave Iraq out of this discussion but I agree that US problems there with providing public security are huge and not easily accomplished. A point never conceded by the critics who mutter constantly about “no plan”.
Surely it is valid to ask why there is no mandate to provide secuity in Kosovo ar least to the degree that forces are authorized to use the degree of force required to protect private homes from arsonists. A few years ago NATO was bombing serbs for doing the same thing. Sorry, to me this simply reinforces the notion that the UN cannot be relied upon.
Sauron