Couldnt you use the Tornado imaging system mentioned earlier?? 🙂
Well there’s certainly no harm in asking I suppose! 😉
Missing turret
If i recall correctly, they briefly showed the upper turret with both guns, but when lifting the rear fuselage the bottom was missing. Was that underside turret located ?
Yes the missing turret was found about half way between the tail and the rest of the aircraft in a tidal gutter. It was in poor condition and the guns had been removed. There was no surrounding airframe and no damage that could be attributed to propeller contact.
Thanks NW. Much else hiding in that marsh do you think?
P-51D, Mosquito – oh and just a Ju88 😀 – convincing English Nature to allow any other excavations is not going to be easy though 🙁 + you have to find them first!
Tail corrosion
Ah! While it is true that the tail seemed to have suffered less corrosion, I have to say this is only by a few degrees – it is still riddled with holes and could not even support its own weight – hence it HAD to be cut into two sections to lift – Well I suppose we could have spent a couple of days rigging a lifting scaffold frame – but we didnt have that luxury. At the time of impact, the tail actually landed almost on the high water mark – in fact various aerial surveys we studied appeared to show it having been moved by the waves – it would also have been one of the last sections to disappear into the mud and therefore would have had a couple more decades of fresh water washing over it in the form of rain I suppose. I think the big problem with the aircraft involved was that they were in unpainted natural metal finish when they crashed …..
Also remember the crash site is not that far from where a certain Vulcan has been quietly being reduced to corrosion products in only 20 years – and that was painted!
To be fair, the timescale of the auction prevented a prudent approach to Vulcan ownership for anyone unfamiliar with the airframe in question.
Call me cynical, But I suspect that the previous owner was counting on this factor 😡
It is interesting to note how the requirement to ‘create’ a structured story for the programme extrapolates known facts perhaps beyond what they can reasonably confirm.
The concluding theory, whilst of passing interest, was far from certain, and raised, by implication, issues of blame and responsibility which are maybe best left undisturbed.
Which aircraft hit which is of course impossible to tell & really serves no purpose – both pilots were very competent and experienced, but new to the type. The visibility problem had already been identified and delayed introduction of the A-26 – a new canopy had been designed but this only partially solved the problem (strange TT didnt use any of this – they had all our notes and research – which is what you saw them holding!) Some A-26s had been modified with a hand-built version of the new design canopy – including Zuber’s but this would have made little difference as there was still the blindspot below. Hubbard’s still had the original design, which was perhaps why he was accompanied by a crew chief?
We had discussed this in depth with TT before the project and warned against any apportioning of blame, but at the end of the day we had no control over the finished programme – no doubt one of the reasons so few groups get involved with such projects.
Recovery versus Memorial
Its good to see that the programme has generated some debate – everyone is entitled to their opinions. 🙂
In the eventuality of the aircraft structure being sound we had made contingency plans to finance a continued recovery as we knew from the start that TT would never accomplish this in 3 days! However the structure was as we honestly expected and the whole thing would have crumbled if disturbed. There were few smaller relics to remove as the systems had been stripped at the time of the crash – yet they left the guns & a turret!!! The engine was already detached and lying several feet in front of its bearers, so we had no qualms about lifting that – TT did seem keen to lift the nosewheel assembly out, but this would have destroyed the cockpit & we knew another one lay only 80 feet away.
Obviously all the guns had to be removed and the turret was again already seperated as was the gunners escape hatch + a few smaller parts, motors, panels etc. Yes the bulk of the aircraft was left intact and as I stated, now has a lagoon constructed over it for the birds which will be suitably named and eventually appear on the large scale maps of the area. I understand BAe overflew the site recently with a Tornado using some special imaging equipment and the shape of the aircraft can still be made out – making a sort of hi-tech memorial! We also considered a plaque at the edge of the marsh, but at the present we feel this would not last long 🙁 (for reasons I cannot go into at present).
Press involvement in Digs
I quite agree with your comments re press involvement – fortunately we have yet to make such a grim discovery that would close a dig down and we do try to control press access to our digs – I do have memories of a parachute caught on the JCB bucket before I could signal the driver to stop and a figure emerge from the hedgerow with cameras swinging about his neck as he ran and then tried to bribe the JCB driver to recreate the shot as we had got the thing down by the time he got there!!! He couldnt believe us – “but everyone wants to be in the papers!” Not like that we don’t!
We do still give press the stories, though usually just after the dig – one of our priorities is recording memories whilst there are still witnesses to speak to and I have to confess the local press is a great way of finding such people. In our area many farms have consolidated and the villages are all executive barn conversions etc. meaning the people there when an aircraft came down have long since retired and can often no longer afford to live in the villages 🙁
We thought long & hard about TT involvement & one of the criteria we set ourselves was no chance of unwanted discoveries & even hopefully no ammunition – which was the case – though EOD still confiscated the guns 🙁
“Useless in an emergency?”
I used to have a couple of original crowbars – until I got an offer I could’nt refuse 😉 I have to say I feel they were more of a morale booster than serious escape tool – they were very light and made of hollow thin wall steel tube with solid ends, one of mine looked as though someone had tried to open a crate with it before thinking better of it. I think if I had been trapped the old one-piece escape axe would have been my preferred option!
Release of info
I was bound by a promise to the TT not to reveal too much – but am now willing to answer any questions – we have some 700+ photos & as I am still off work following my heart op I intend to use the time to get a decent page on our website ASAP.
I note on the other thread questions raised about getting involved with TV & have to confess it was a difficult decision – we have been approached several times & before this and turned most down – we have also been asked for stories by national papers & done the same – One of our main concerns was how any relatives may react and this project was done with the full consent of those we managed to trace.
Very good but…. after 72hrs digging they left it there ?
Yep! It was a “fossil” only the spars and u/c were still metal, the rest was crystalline corrosion products and concretion around where the metal had been. We would have ended up with a pile of bits – the only reason it looks to have held its shape is the applied duralumin “armour” sheets around the cockpit. Plus it was a shell – most of the avionics, fire control and instrumentation had been removed at the time of the crash
After a discussion, we used the machinery available to excavate the second aircraft the day after filming – we knew that it was already in bits and one set of u/c legs etc is all that most visitors to the museum would want to see – it also seemed disrespectful to break Hubbards plane up just for a truck load of relics – It now has a specially created lagoon for the wading birds on top of it – which seems more appropriate (IMO).
The second aircraft did indeed prove to be broken up but yielded many artefacts including the predicted u/c legs – complete nose wheel with tyre still in its wheel well with cockpit floor attached, the control column, a few instruments (most had also been removed at the time of the crash), both rudder pedals and an intact pilots seat etc.
Quick Reminder! 🙂
Just a quick reminder 😀 – The TT programme “Bombers in the Marsh” is due to be aired tomorrow, 16th January 2005 at 5.00pm. I can promise you it will be worth well worth watching (IMO!) Hope they cut the bit with me in it 😮
For a brief taster page on the project see: Time Team Article
Its a shame that as a genuine WW2 type the B25 has not been preserved by the likes of the Newark, Coventry and Sunderland museums when they were relativly plentyfull in the uk in the early 80’s and even now. But I guess thats due to the asking prices?
Have been following this thread with interest – being an associate member of the RAF Millom Museum – we are just starting to acquire airframes to add to the collection – the usual selection up to now, Vampire, Canberra & recently a Tornado cockpit, but a WW2 veteran seems an unobtainable goal. I had no idea that aircraft like this still existed in such a state in this country today – how does this happen? You mention the asking price as a stumbling block – can I ask what this is & who is selling it – is it really for sale or is this just heresay?
Those who have visited our museum will have seen the work done on some of our airframes both by members and the local prison workshops + of course our extensive exhibits of smaller artefacts and relic items which recieved such favorable comment in Flypast recently. However it is seems very difficult these days to take the next step and despite the enthusiasm and resources we have available it seems that the hardest task is simply finding out details of aircraft that are available. :confused:
….and it should have a cellulose nitrate covering called Rotoloid…. Anne
Cellulose Nitrate – As in Guncotton!!??!! 😮 Best not drop it then! 😉
Seriously though – Thanks Anne
Seafire blade confirmed
Thanks Anne – much appreciated – don’t worry I am not going to inundate you with queries – most of my other blades are still attached to props or engines & having dug them up I know what they are off :rolleyes: