This is OT but… Has Gripen NG been completely dismissed in Greece?

If it has, is it because it will arrive too late (I think Saab claimed it could be ready by 2012), or because it is perceived to be too weak? Or lack of two engines? Interestingly it seems even US Navy has now decided that one engine is sufficient (F-35).

Gripen NG will have significantly increased range, increased thrust, 10 pylons, 6 tons payload, IRST, AESA, satellite comms, enhance MAW, etc, etc. It will be able to carry IRIS-T.

The biggest advantage however may be the price, not just for the plane but also upgrades and to operate.

For political reasons Rafale or EF may be to prefer, but if you are looking for a fighter than can take on F-16 I would think Gripen NG will be more than adequate? The low cost will allow you to buy more planes compared to both EF and Rafale.

L